Avalanche traps 10 Indian army soldiers in Siachen

[Tipu7]

Your generals dint leave us with any choice.one of us had to lose siachen forever ,so we decided let that be Pakistan.

Hence proved that India was aggressor in Siachin.................??? Or not?

 

[VCheng]

Hence proved that India was aggressor in Siachin.................??? Or not?

Legally speaking, India's claim to Siachen is actually more robust than Pakistan's, if one goes back to the primary sources. However, that validity has not been tested.

 

[EAK]

I guess the weak history teaching in Pak is to be blamed here....

nope swami jee it's actually your monastic order which is upside down..

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Hence proved that India was aggressor in Siachin.................??? Or not?

Lollzzz like we ever denied that. What world are you in man? . You thought you'll trigger a secession of our state. We retaliated by actually occupying your territory. Though there might be some truth in Pak wanting to increase it's presence in SIachen as indicated by planned purchases of equipment, we wanted to keep you out for good.

 

[Tipu7]

However, that validity has not been tested.

ANd to justify this validity you have the right to charge your forces into the region which can ignite another deep dispute in region?

 

[VCheng]

ANd to justify this validity you have the right to charge your forces into the region which can ignite another deep dispute in region?

The Indian action was carried out only after determining that there was a sufficiently sound legal basis for doing so. That is why the international community has not done anything in Siachen, as opposed to the Pakistani action in Kargil which was reversed.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

ANd to justify this validity you have the right to charge your forces into the region which can ignite another deep dispute in region?

Instead of asking these questions here, you should ask your generals why they brought these things upon your country.

 

[Tipu7]

Instead of asking these questions here, you should ask your generals why they brought these things upon your country.

Will you plz keep your opinion limited to yourself for a while?

The Indian action was carried out only after determining that there was a sufficiently sound legal basis for doing so. That is why the international community has not done anything in Siachen, as opposed to the Pakistani action in Kargil which was reversed.

Retaliation to Khalistan movement??

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Was this military agression and occupation similar to what you tried to achieve in Kashmir, but failed?

India's illegal intervention in Junagadh was prior to the Tribal lashkar entering J&K, and unlike J&K, there was absolutely no ambiguity over the accession of Junagadh to Pakistan, with official Indian communiques to Pakistan recognizing the fact that accession had occurred, while protesting the same.

 

[chhota bheem]

Hence proved that India was aggressor in Siachin.................??? Or not?

Dude if your army knows we are to occpy a post in advance will your army try to take the post first or not,if PA takes the post will you call PA the agressor.

We only reacted.

 

[Tipu7]

We only reacted.

To what???
To some self generated threat that PA is going to do that............???
Using this logic............ Indian army was aggressor in 71 too...........

 

[Dash]

Actually no. Siachen was retaliation for ISI fanning the flames of Khalistan. Congrats, your agency lost you territory.....again.

You had to say it here a temptation I resisted....

 

[my2cents]

Pakistan is ready to declare both Siachin and Kargil as military free zone....... but it's India who is as usual not acting wisely.......
As long as this childish attitude of India remain, soldiers will keep dying...... not by enemy, but by nature......


You will be lucky even if you find their bodies........
Avalanche in Siachin are worse thing you can imagine......

You guys do proxy wars, occupy heights when we vacate, behead our soldiers and you expect us to trust you. Hell NO!

 

[Dash]

ANd to justify this validity you have the right to charge your forces into the region which can ignite another deep dispute in region?

The charge was ignited by one tactical and one strategic reason by yourself.
tactical - Use it as a bargaining chip for your support to militant activities.
strategic - Keep an eye on the Chinese movement of forces on Akhai Chin.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Actually no. Siachen was retaliation for ISI fanning the flames of Khalistan. Congrats, your agency lost you territory.....again.

The list of absurd excuses to justify unprovoked military aggression continues ...