What's new

Avalanche traps 10 Indian army soldiers in Siachen

It's not a question of India's 'business'. India has no say in this. I want to understand your thinking. Assume nothing happened and that we're in 1970. - who's your PM Man? Do you accept that Mujib is the legitimately elected PM of Pakistan?
Assuming free and fair elections, allow parliament to function, build coalitions as they see fit and elect a Prime Minister.
You seen the size of Junagarh? The damn 'kingom' was the size of Banglore or maybe Yelahanka to Bangalore Airport. And you excpect that we keep this little hole open on our side? An average person can wake up in Junagarh, take a dump across the strat in Pakistan and read his newspaper after crossing back. Yeah, that's gonna work.
Size is irrelevant, it's the principle of the matter - the UK continues to hold onto the Falkland Islands half a world away on another continent, for example.
 
.
Of course:

1. Indian government deliberations on blockading and stoking unrest in Junagadh and her principalities as a prelude to a military invasion and annexation occurred after the official accession of Junagadh to Pakistan. The blockades and stoking/support of unrest/terrorism inside Junagadh preceded the Tribal lashkar in J&K.

2. J&K had not acceded to either State at the time of the Tribal invasion, unlike Junagadh which had acceded to Pakistan

Dont you see, how lacking in character, your leader were here.

On one hand, they wanted Kashmir, on the principle of it being Muslim majority and professed two nation theory.

On the other hand they accepted accession of Junagadh, despite it being a 90 % a hindu majority state , surrounded on all sides by India.

You wanted to provoke India, create confusion and tensions between the two countries, well you got it!!


We are glad Sardar Patel stepped in, taught you guys a lesson for such duplicity.

Not only foiled your plans in Kashmir but didn't let you get away such treachery in Junagadh either.
 
.
Please bring war upon us the inferior hindus

Don not forget what your MD and Doval etc have been talking in front of world regarding the way they brought war and will, to us... Doesn't an answer lies within?

There is always reaction to any action but patients are advised here though we are not war mongering like our neighbors are but we will respond as befitting after all we are enemies, aren't we?
 
.
How fascinating!

Part of the highly complex plastic surgery techniques developed by Ancient Hindus no doubt - if they were transplanting elephant heads onto humans, adding a second face would be a piece of cake I imagine

Technically India admitted involvement in terrorism in Pakistan with IK Gujral's 'deactivation of ops' - you can't deactivate something that isn't active, and while 'deactivating terrorist support inside Pakistan' could be talked about openly because it brought international and regional political dividends, a subsequent reactivation would, for obvious reasons, not be mentioned.
LOL.

Do what you wish to. :)
 
.
Meh, such casualties are inevitable In a terrain like Siachen.
 
.
Don not forget what your MD and Doval etc have been talking in front of world regarding the way they brought war and will, to us... Doesn't an answer lies within?

There is always reaction to any action but patients are advised here though we are not war mongering like our neighbors are but we will respond as befitting after all we are enemies, aren't we?
True....we are enemies .don't expect

And about war mongering......... do you remember Kargil and there after confession of musharraf on both terrsiom and kar??
Technically India admitted involvement in terrorism in Pakistan with IK Gujral's 'deactivation of ops' - you can't deactivate something that isn't active, and while 'deactivating terrorist support inside Pakistan' could be talked about openly because it brought international and regional political dividends, a subsequent reactivation would, for obvious reasons, not be mentioned.
Technically musharraf admitted pakistani involvement in terrorism in india ....so what is your point ?

Do you expect us getting bleed with your thousand cut ..........without even feeling pain agony for usrself?

Nah we will do what is in our interest........
 
.
False - the Indian military mounted several overt and covert expeditions to Saichen and protested the demarcation of the LoC on Pakistani and international maps, and therefore created the tensions and escalation prior to occupying the glacier without provocation.

India created the atmosphere of distrust and hostility and then used the very atmosphere it created to justify unprovoked military aggression - Junagadh, Hyederabad, Siachen, East Pakistan, LTTE in Sri Lanka - India's history is replete with examples of unprovoked hostile military aggression against other States.
To what???
To some self generated threat that PA is going to do that............???
Using this logic............ Indian army was aggressor in 71 too...........
Self generated threat ??? Atleast believe your army personal and what they where doing shopping in London.
 
.
True....we are enemies .don't expect

Exactly, the busy past of ours has taught us many lessons so at last we are seeing things clearly.

And about war mongering......... do you remember Kargil and there after confession of musharraf on both terrsiom and kar??

Your defence acquisitions, hues and cries with every happening in your own land against Pakistan are far more prominent to become aware of mongering. In case of India, Mushy replied as what i said above, the befitting reply for intrusion from India and that will be our strategy forever.
 
.
LOL.. indian logic.. and by the way last time i checked you were the one giving counter arguments swami jee.:azn:

See like i already said... when you don't have the answer you people go off topic and troll... yes i countered his statement which is valid, what was his reply ??? nothing but troll just like you,,, don't act like over smart
 
. .
Your defence acquisitions,
so you are saying we won't buy or make anything because pak wants so ?.......good logic
hues and cries with every happening in your own land against Pakistan are far more prominent to become aware of mongering
Do we blame pak for maoist or NE problem ? ........Give response if you can would like to hear your
opinion

And any terrorism that have links to pak (read islamic terrorism) will blamed on pak because that is what your intelligence is doing.......and so we will .....with appropriate response being given
 
.
so you are saying we won't buy or make anything because pak wants so ?.......good logic

We always wanted the peace yet was taken as an advantage.

Do we blame pak for maoist or NE problem ? ........Give response if you can would like to hear your
opinion

Those are not yet grown enough and even if brought to Int'l attention will end up like Kashmir conflict but on other hand whatever happened there which may attract Int'l attention, India never miss a chance to blame Pakistan since 47 Kashmir till today.

And any terrorism that have links to pak (read islamic terrorism) will blamed on pak because that is what your intelligence is doing.......and so we will .....with appropriate response being given

There is no such Islamic Terrorism thing but an ideology being deluded by obsessed with Islam into the weak minds. Though the BLAME word itself defines the authenticity of case whether to be genuine or not proved one. The meaning of response would have been defined as well as India must have considered the case of kashmir Freedom Fighters.
 
.
Dont you see, how lacking in character, your leader were here.

On one hand, they wanted Kashmir, on the principle of it being Muslim majority and professed two nation theory.

On the other hand they accepted accession of Junagadh, despite it being a 90 % a hindu majority state , surrounded on all sides by India.

You wanted to provoke India, create confusion and tensions between the two countries, well you got it!!

What it shows is how 'lacking in character' the Indian leadership at the time was, given how archived records of the time show Indian government deliberations on blockading and sowing unrest in Junagadh prior to a military invasion and occupation, far in advance of the Tribal Lashkar's incursion into Kashmir.

LOL.

Do what you wish to. :)
Of course, your attempts at obfuscation and outright intellectual dishonesty merely allow for the arguments against Indian duplicity to stand unchallenged.
 
.
We always wanted the peace yet was taken as an advantage.
You wanted peace ....but become vassal state of super power for their games of death and still continue to do so
you wanted peace .....but wanted to have strategic depth and released reign of terror in afghanistan
you wanted peace .....but released reign of terror in kashmir and provok india
you wanted peace .....but got involved in arab wars and unnecessary hostility with Israel
you wanted peace .....but want on to become thekedar of Islam

Peace is just a figure of expression for pakistan.....it does not mean anything to pakistan

Those are not yet grown enough and even if brought to Int'l attention will end up like Kashmir conflict but on other hand whatever happened there which may attract Int'l attention, India never miss a chance to blame Pakistan since 47 Kashmir till today.
This statement only proof of your zero knowledge of maoist and NE insurgency

There is no such Islamic Terrorism thing but an ideology being deluded by obsessed with Islam into the weak minds. Though the BLAME word itself defines the authenticity of case whether to be genuine or not proved one.
forget about india ...tell that to paris attack , 9/11 attack or in urghier
The meaning of response would have been defined as well as India must have considered the case of kashmir Freedom Fighters.
You do understand that Kashmir FF are now considered as islamic militant by many countries ...........
why do you think there is no interest in Kashmir dispute anymore or by anyone,including muslim countries? ...
Forget world even your country is not that much proactive if you have observed
 
.
See like i already said... when you don't have the answer you people go off topic and troll... yes i countered his statement which is valid, what was his reply ??? nothing but troll just like you,,, don't act like over smart

My point concluded..
well about your so called :pleasantry: valid argument .. go through this thread again..slow this time..you'll get your answers..now stop B.shi**ng and stop quoting me..:wave:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom