Attacks against Iranian history, culture, nations by foreigners and insiders

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

This topic is made to identify the sources who attack Iranian history, culture and nations, in its pure sense and meaning. So it excludes for example propaganda or attacks against islam, judaism, christianity. Todays attack against Iranian identity is unfortunately not only done by outsiders, but also by insiders and it's a kind of "kine/lajbazi" against Iranian symbols, meaning Deep Hatred.

Revisionism, changing history against Iran will also be reported.

To start the topic I'll post some example of these attacks.

Keep it civilized, trolling by some should not be the reason to cancel this topic/project, because then the troll will become the winner, just banning or warning them is enough.

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Hassan Abbasi insulting founding father of Iran Cyrus the great, calling him puppets of zionists:

A political strategist and conspiracy theorist, Abbasi is known for delivering ardent and virulent speeches.

 

[BATMAN]

This is the exactly the stuff, which mulla has been feeding to Iranians, from past half century.

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Nasser purpirar ناصر پورپیرار‎‎; born Nasser Banakonandeh Persian: ناصر بناکننده‎‎; (b. 1940 or 1941 in Tehran – d. 27 August 2015 in Tehran) was a famous Iranian writer and revisionist historian. He was known for his controversial theories questioning the academically recognized historiography of Iran from Achaemenids to the beginning of the Safavid period.

Among his bizare writings is that Salman Al-Farsi (Salman the persian), Mazdak, Mani, Zoroaster, Babak, Abu Moslem, were invented by modern Jewish historians.

Further he wrote that that the Achaemenid dynasty was a group of ancient barbarian Slavic invaders that ended with Darius the Great after they returned to their homeland in the Eurasian steppes. The rest of the Achaemenid, Parthian, Sassanid, Tahirid, Ghaznavid, Seljuqid and Samanid dynasties according to Pourpirar were fabricated by historians of mostly Jewish background as part of a Jewish conspiracy.

Because he attacks Iranian identity, history, @mohsen considers this revisionist ex-soviet puppet (member of tudeh party) to be credible person.

This is the exactly the stuff, which mulla has been feeding to Iranians, from past half century.

What do you mean?..

 

[mohsen]

Now that you like it.
fabricating historic sites by Zionists during Rezah shah:

mentioning the unfavorable part of history is called attacking Iranian history!

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Ayatollah khomeini insulting king Khosrow I (Anushiruwan the just) of sassanid dynasty.

Khosrow's reign had a major impact on Islamic culture and political life. Many of his policies and reforms were brought into the Islamic nation in their transformation from a decentralized confederation into an imperial empire. There are a considerable number of Islamic works that were inspired by the reign of Khosrow I, for example the Kitab al-Taj of Jahiz.

During Khosrow's ambitious reign, art and science flourished in Persia and the Sasanian Empire reached its peak of glory and prosperity. His rule was preceded by his father's and succeeded by Hormizd IV. Khosrow Anushiruwan is one of the most popular emperors in Iranian culture and literature and, outside of Iran, his name became, like that of Caesar in the history of Rome, a designation of the Sasanian kings.

 

[Full Moon]

Focus on your today. It is just better than the non-sense of what happened hundreds or thousands of years ago. Leaving nationalistic arrogance aside, starting from the early 1970s (with the oil boom of October 1973), you can mark the golden era of Iran (in comparison to all of its past even during Koroush time). Again, we are leaving nationalistic arrogance aside here, and talking about "human development". In ancient times, you get big states with pretty maps. But you don't get the same level of human development. What I mean by human development is: much better economic means, mass education, hygiene, plumbing, electricity, modern dentistry, running water, high-tech medicine, sewage services, vaccines, mass entertainment, state enforced law and order, mass communication, higher life expectancy (by far)...etc.

 

[EgyptianAmerican]

This topic is made to identify the sources who attack Iranian history, culture and nations, in its pure sense and meaning. So it excludes for example propaganda or attacks against islam, judaism, christianity. Todays attack against Iranian identity is unfortunately not only done by outsiders, but also by insiders and it's a kind of "kine/lajbazi" against Iranian symbols, meaning Deep Hatred.

Revisionism, changing history against Iran will also be reported.

To start the topic I'll post some example of these attacks.

Please list me, I am an Anti-Iranian and hate all of your history

 

[mohsen]

fabricating the Cyrus کوروش as a prophet!

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Pan-turkist elements infiltrating sport stadions, chanting slogans such as death to persians, arabian gulf etc, feeling empowered since there is no Iranian nationalism.

 

[EgyptianAmerican]

Pan-turkist elements infiltrating sport stadions, chanting slogans such as death to persians, arabian gulf etc, feeling empowered since there is no Iranian nationalism.

Is this in Iran?

 

[arashkamangir]

Pointless and harmful thread in my opinion. One has to look at current and maybe immediate past for reference to develop a brighter future.

There are far more critical challenges ahead that does not recognize boundary, ethnicity or culture. The environmental degradation and climate change are causing havoc in our plain sight in and around our country. As an example, lack of farming jobs due to degradation in farmable land has pushed many to cities, reduced employment opportunity and in some cases where the living conditions are worse people have joined extreme groups to get paid... You can see example of that all over our region. Where does any of this have anything to do with history of the region? Which part of this topic would help address this?

My point is, we ought to work toward collaboration with all the people in the region to solve major challenges ahead of us, because one way or another, as climate effects degrade living conditions, we would be fighting over resources and at that point it wouldn't be along our national border or ethnicity or culture but between neighbors and friends. In that regard, let's change our mind to a collaborative mindset and pursue interdependence.


References:
http://www.natureworldnews.com/arti...ica-soon-uninhabitable-due-climate-change.htm

https://intpolicydigest.org/2016/10/29/climate-change-driving-conflict-middle-east/

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.pbs...ributor-to-the-syrian-conflict-climate-change

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Please list me, I am an Anti-Iranian and hate all of your history

Egyptians are not arabs, arabism was imposed upon them by Nasser, with its failed devestating arab nationalist ideology Nasserism which made whole coalitions lose wars against Israel. I've no problem with Egyptians.

In 1931, following a visit to Egypt, Syrian Arab nationalist Sati' al-Husri remarked that "[Egyptians] did not possess an Arab nationalist sentiment; did not accept that Egypt was a part of the Arab lands, and would not acknowledge that the Egyptian people were part of the Arab nation."[32] The later 1930s would become a formative period for Arab nationalism in Egypt, in large part due to efforts by Syrian, Palestinian and Lebanese intellectuals.[33]

Historically, Egyptians have considered themselves as distinct from 'Arabs' and even at present rarely do they make that identification in casual contexts; il-'arab [the Arabs] as used by Egyptians refers mainly to the inhabitants of the Gulf states... Egypt has been both a leader of pan-Arabism and a site of intense resentment towards that ideology. Egyptians had to be made, often forcefully, into "Arabs" [during the Nasser era] because they did not historically identify themselves as such. Egypt was self-consciously a nation not only before pan-Arabism but also before becoming a colony of the British Empire. Its territorial continuity since ancient times, its unique history as exemplified in its pharaonic past and later on its Coptic language and culture, had already made Egypt into a nation for centuries. Egyptians saw themselves, their history, culture and language as specifically Egyptian and not "Arab."[43]

Egyptians' attachment to pan-Arabism was particularly questioned after the Six-Day War. Nasser had overplayed his hand in trying to form a pan-Arab hegemony under himself. Thousands of Egyptians had lost their lives, and the country became disillusioned with Arab politics.[12] The Camp David Accords between Egypt and Israel in 1978 further fractured the Arabic-speaking countries. Nasser's successor Anwar Sadat, both through public policy and his peace initiative with Israel, revived an uncontested Egyptian orientation, unequivocally asserting that only Egypt and Egyptians were his responsibility. The terms "Arab", "Arabism," and "Arab unity" became conspicuously absent.[13]

 

[haman10]

Pointless and harmful thread in my opinion.

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Pointless and harmful thread in my opinion. One has to look at current and maybe immediate past for reference to develop a brighter future.

There are far more critical challenges ahead that does not recognize boundary, ethnicity or culture. The environmental degradation and climate change are causing havoc in our plain sight in and around our country.

Bro, that's your opinion which I respect. And I agree we have problems on different fronts, one of them indeed enviromental problems. I welcome you to open a topic about Iranian environment and I'll also contribute to that topic. But lets be constructive, each of us have own respobsiblity toward different goals for improving our country, be it cultural, environmental, industrial etc. If some of our friends don't like this topic, then please contribute to other topics. Thanks.

Is this in Iran?

yes