graphican:
OK, as far as I understand:
1. there were 2 lines of control with a bufferzone in between - that's why the border is unmarked and disputed in the first place.
2. both sides patroled in the bufferzone previously with mutual understanding that none should build sth INSIDE the buffer zone - this was the statue quo
3. since 2008, India has buiilt an airbase about 200 meters in its side right next to the bufferzone - low IQ as it was the Chinese watched it with an amusement but did nothing since it, at least on paper, didn't affect the staue quo even though Indians were preparing to itch forward.
4. India, just like a thief, saw there was no reaction from China therefore started recently to have built permanent stuctures like bunkers etc INSIDE the buffer zone to protect its nearby airbase, thinking that CHina must be too busy with Japan and earthquake recues at the moment thus couldn't care less to this side. -- So now India started to steal lands in a sneaky and cunning (in fact low IQ) fashion as India usually does things!
More importantly, this act destroyed the statue quo.
5. when China was forced to react by erecting temp tents inside buffer zone to protest, BOTH Indian army AND Indian media stated massive daily lying campaign crying foe to the world that "CHina invaded India xxkm... or intruding xxxkm deep inside innocent india, etc. " taking the Bufferzone as sort of "de-facto Indian soil".
6. The lying Indian army then moved in comically
pretending being a victim of "Chinese Invasion", to have "flag meeting" with China demanding Chinese retreat, and proposing to Indian gov a military option ... - a "1962 v2.0" is underway.
7. After watching the lying Indian media, low IQ Indian mass and internet warriors, of course, got excited and started to protest burning Chinese flags, etc, forcing Indian gov to act.
8. Indian gov kept silent in the beginning because it knew the fabricated low iq lie but has no guts to tell the Indian mass.
9. the West also knew India was lying soon after the "inccident" thus kept silent, except 1 or 2 blog entries in the Economist or Dailymail to bash China a bit taking advantage of anything...as always.
10. Keeping bigger strategic pic (BRICS, etc) in mind, China, as usual, reacted with measured but firm steps demanding India to demantle the bunkers and return to the previous Statue quo, knowing that China has overall strategic advantage in DBO area either way.
11. Now the Chinese mass started to know truth and critise Chinese gov for being not tough enough and demanding dismember "India" as a fictional idea once for all, teaching low IQ AND lying Indians a lesson that will last for the rest of their natural lives.
So it could be more precise here and there, but basically this is the entire story.
