Arabs invasion of India - Long Story Short

[Jaanbaz]

Feel good week.

 

[vegav]

Buddy Muhammad Bin Qasim invaded under Ummayad Caliphate, the invasion was cuz of strategic and trade reasons, plus the local population had turned against Sindhi ruler Raja Dahir, the notorious king who married his own sisters, they found it a brilliant opportunity, Ummayad empire was huge on one end it had sindh and multan, on the other it had Lisbon in Portugal, as far as the plunder is concerned this has always happened throughout human history, in europe, in africa or in asia, the victorious always did plunder the wealth of defeated army, Nadir Shah u r referring to also defeated and killed Ottoman Caliphate's Grand Vazir Osman Topal Pasha and then plundered Dehli, however the invasions under Rashidun Caliphate were different, that is the first 4 caliphs and companions of Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W), when Sassanids were defeated and Pakistan's baluchistan was captured, even the people of Sassanid empire and Byzantine empire rejoiced when under Caliph Umar (R) their lands were liberated, cuz their reign wasnt guided by lust for materialism rather spiritualism, after those 4 caliphs (around 30 years after death of Prophet (S.A.W) arab nationalism and materialistic kingdoms (just like any other kingdom) like ummayads started

please dont quote the soft **** called chachnama to which bin qasim probably jacked off.

Raja Dhir lost because the buddhists conspired against him and plotted his downfall.MBQ just took advantage.

That is very unfortunate part of our History that after the Centralized reign of Gupta,the subcontinent devided into small feudal principalities who fought between each other ,a good opportunity for invaders

Even Prithviraj was just a Feudal lord

Prithviraj was the Maharana of Ajmer,the king of the rajputs and hence Bharat too.

 

[Bornubus]

please dont quote the soft **** called chachnama to which bin qasim probably jacked off.

Raja Dhir lost because the buddhists conspired against him and plotted his downfall.MBQ just took advantage.



Prithviraj was the Maharana of Ajmer,the king of the rajputs and hence Bharat too.

Not all Rajupts but Chauhan Clan.

 

[vegav]

but he was the boss of all the rajputs only,the bravest/strongest and the most ambitious.

 

[Saif al-Arab]

Arabs never got beyond Sindh. Arabs are notorious losers who rarely won wars. It was the non-Arab muslims who kept Islam flag flying.

Muhammed Ghaznavi was a Turk not Arab. The Seljuks were a central Asian nomadic tribe that was Islamised and later became Ghazis. The Mameluks were the "slave" turks. Babur was a Chagtai Turk who also claimed lineage from Genghiz Khan ( which is doubtful, lineage from Genghiz was considered a mater of pride for Central asian warlords).

An Indian of all people badmouthing Arab military history which is unprecedented outside of Western military history (the few main Western powers moreover). Hilarious.

List of largest empires - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rashidun Caliphate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (11th largest empire in world history and the 3 biggest Muslim empire/Muslim empire originating in what is today majority Muslim lands)

Abbasid Caliphate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (9th largest empire in world history and the 2 biggest Muslim empire/Muslim empire originating in what is today majority Muslim lands)

Umayyad Caliphate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (5th biggest empire in world history and THE biggest Muslim empire/Muslim empire originating in what is today majority Muslim lands)

Let alone countless of kingdoms, sultanates, imamates, sheikdoms, emirates etc. on 3 continents (Asia, Europe and Africa).

All above originating from what is now KSA and Arabia.

The current legacy of all this is this landmass and people below;

Nobody outside of Westerners are anywhere near the imperial and military history of Arabs historically based on conquest and number of empires etc. Just plain and simple facts as I demonstrated.

Try barking higher next time while trolling.

India was simply not interesting enough and the Umayyad Caliphate already was engaged in several battles on 3 continents at the same time while managing and ENORMOUS landmass and population. Relations with India were mostly limited to trade along the Arabian Sea. In fact the first mosques outside of the Arab world were built in Western and Southern India by Arab merchants and sailors.

Come back when you have anything similar to show which you have not and will never have.

Anyway I see that you are banned.

 

[vegav]

what good is this empire with no fertile land/rivers and until oil/gas happened in the 20th century just a wortheless desert.

 

[Indian Patriot]

An Indian of all people badmouthing Arab military history which is unprecedented outside of Western military history

How does Indian military success or failure change pathetic arab military history?

You shout and forge an Arab alliance against Houthis in Yemen. What happened? All air strikes came to nothing, the Houthis kept advancing and now you are forced to the negotiation table.

 

[Nav]

Arabs never got beyond Sindh. Arabs are notorious losers who rarely won wars. It was the non-Arab muslims who kept Islam flag flying.

Muhammed Ghaznavi was a Turk not Arab. The Seljuks were a central Asian nomadic tribe that was Islamised and later became Ghazis. The Mameluks were the "slave" turks. Babur was a Chagtai Turk who also claimed lineage from Genghiz Khan ( which is doubtful, lineage from Genghiz was considered a mater of pride for Central asian warlords).

So by the time when Arabs defeated roman and Persian empires who was helping them in these scenarios?

 

[Indian Patriot]

So by the time when Arabs defeated roman and Persian empires who was helping them in these scenarios?

The arabs did not destroy Rome. It was the Huns. And the Roman empire technically ended with the fall of the Byzantine empire when they lost Constantinople.

 

[Nav]

The arabs did not destroy Rome. It was the Huns. And the Roman empire technically ended with the fall of the Byzantine empire when they lost Constantinople.

After Huns it was divided into eastern and western parts . And Constantinople was conquered by sultan Muhammad fateh. But before all this Arabs defeated them in Arabian peninsula and Africa.

 

[Indian Patriot]

After Huns it was divided into eastern and western parts . And Constantinople was conquered by sultan Muhammad fateh. But before all this Arabs defeated them in Arabian peninsula and Africa.

Rome did not end with the pillage of Huns. And the Hun invasion was a long continuous process which lasted decades.
The roman empire was reduced considerably but Byzantium was officially Roman Empire.

It is highly doubtful if arabs ever faced Romans much less defeat them. But even if that is assumed to be true then it is sad that the last time the arabs faced victory in battle the romans were still around. LOL!!