What's new

Ancient Man and His First Civilizations.Proving Aryan Invasion Theory is a myth and severe lie

Status
Not open for further replies.
........ only the Pelasgians lost their language when the greeks ruled them. So now are we back to "aryans" invaded and ruled us ? :lol:

As I said count me out of such numb brained discussions.
 
There are hundred of castes/tribes in South Asia, for this study they chose 74.

Except Jews , all others are SC/ST or OBC and deserve for reservation here.Perhaps their mission is to find out ancient root.
 
The rest of India meaning everyone in India who is not sold on socialism and class/caste warfare that are your pet theories. I see no evidence of any attempt at restoring cultural or social hegemony from the Brahmins. If anything it is the Brahmins and upper castes who went rogue and became Communists and Marxists who held monopolies in academia in India until now. I see Hindutva advocates as belonging to all castes and from all walks of life.

I am very much a Dalit and I do not see myself as different from the Brahmins. It has never factored in any of my interpersonal relationships or life in anyway.

If the entire Sangh Parivar is not an attempt at restoring cultural or social hegemony of the Brahmins, what else is it?

That is not affected by the fact that the same Brahmins, and other upper castes, also 'went rogue' in your terminology and became Communists and Marxists; nor does it alter the fact that that they held power within the hegemony of the Congress party as well.

Your seeing Hindutva advocates as belonging to all castes does not particularly affect reality. The reality is that the head of the RSS has to be a Brahmin; the reality is that their political front the BJP has always been given a leader by the RSS; whatever caste he belongs to, whether he or she is a Kalyan Singh, or an Uma Bharti or a Narendra Modi is merely the tactical decision of the RSS.

You are to be congratulated; you are among the few Uncle Toms that the Dalits have, albeit a female one.

........ only the Pelasgians lost their language when the greeks ruled them. So now are we back to "aryans" invaded and ruled us ? :lol:

As I said count me out of such numb brained discussions.

It was not lost as late as Herodotus. The Greeks had a smaller territory and many more incursions than did India, if you had bothered to look beyond Wikipedia.

It is surprising how often you count yourself out of such numb-brained discussions, only to interject whenever you feel you might score a cheap point. Welcome back whenever you want.
 
@Joe Shearer .I already told you , albinos is used to mock white people in that article.It used in a sarcastic manner.
But I gave you a link about a study.That is from Russia&India report..It is correct.
I know some parts in this article is wrong .But some others correct like that link.

There was no mocking, no sarcasm, if the illustrations are any guide. It was just a singularly ill-chosen example. No point trying to bring it to life.
 
I think it is his inability to come to terms with the knowledge that he based his hatred of Brahmins on false hypothesis all his life.

Does this mean I too will get to discriminate and harass people just like my forefathers? :partay:
 
oh please mr.shearer,go talk to numbskulls.

What else am I doing?

u can come to my village and ask the dalits,who are better brahmins/OBCs?

we are not silly tams like those from the northern/westenr part.

Oh, so now we need to distinguish ourselves from 'those' Tams. Back to the myth of "Real Scots would never...."

Surprising; I thought you confined yourself to hate mail and never condescended to deal in facts. Of course, now I see why; very wise never to have done so in the past.

so please and regarding political power,we still have it but not openly,

please go ask the dalits on TN,who actually oppress them and seriously,we dont hide behind communist masks to save ourselves,our honour does that.u wont get it as a confused pseudo.

Yes, right, the grey eminence behind Jayalalitha's throne. What else? I am truly impressed by your display of political savvy.
 
Does this mean I too will get to discriminate and harass people just like my forefathers? :partay:
According to those dopes, yes. If the Parivar comes to power. Welcome to the wonderful world of Manu.
 
According to those dopes, yes. If the Parivar comes to power. Welcome to the wonderful world of Manu.

I'm not sure Hindutva is the same as Brahmanical subjugation though. The Political sphere hasn't been able to influence the cultural sphere in any great measure especially in the rural areas of our Nation.

Even today, my folks back in our little hamlet in the Western Ghats are pretty orthodox, and that means refusal to touch members of a certain caste or have food in the same room with them. 50 years of Congress rule hasn't changed this, and there are no indications that BJP rule will bolster such sick practices.
 
Difference between South Indian brahmins and rest of South Indians exists genetically even if its small. But phenotype or looks wise one can't distinguish if at all. Here is autosomal genetic data of different South Indian castes.

Tamil Brahmin:
South Indian: 47%
Baloch: 38%
Caucasian: 6%
NE Euro: 4%

Tamil Dalit:
South Indian: 73%
Baloch: 22%
Caucasian: 1%
NE Euro: 0%

Tamil Scheduled Caste:
South Indian: 59%
Baloch: 32%
Caucasian: 3%
NE Euro: 0%

Tamil Sri Lankan:
South Indian: 58%
Baloch: 33%
Caucasian: 3%
NE Euro: 0%

Tamil Nadar:
South Indian: 57%
Baloch: 31%
Caucasian: 2%
NE Euro: 0%

Now Karala.

kerala

South Indian: 47%
Baloch: 33%
Caucasian: 7%
NE Euro: 2%

kerala-brahmin
South Indian: 43%
Baloch: 39%
Caucasian: 4%
NE Euro: 6%

kerala-christian
South Indian: 48%
Baloch: 34%
Caucasian: 7%
NE Euro: 2%

kerala-muslim
South Indian: 52%
Baloch: 31%
Caucasian: 3%
NE Euro: 2%

kerala-nair
South Indian: 48%
Baloch: 37%
Caucasian: 4%
NE Euro: 3%


source is Harappa Ancestry Project | Genetics and South Asia
 
If the entire Sangh Parivar is not an attempt at restoring cultural or social hegemony of the Brahmins, what else is it?
That is not affected by the fact that the same Brahmins, and other upper castes, also 'went rogue' in your terminology and became Communists and Marxists; nor does it alter the fact that that they held power within the hegemony of the Congress party as well.
Your seeing Hindutva advocates as belonging to all castes does not particularly affect reality. The reality is that the head of the RSS has to be a Brahmin; the reality is that their political front the BJP has always been given a leader by the RSS; whatever caste he belongs to, whether he or she is a Kalyan Singh, or an Uma Bharti or a Narendra Modi is merely the tactical decision of the RSS.
You are to be congratulated; you are among the few Uncle Toms that the Dalits have, albeit a female one.

That is hogwash. RSS does not believe in caste and they never speak in terms of caste. Only misled and motivated people like you do. Modi belongs to a lower caste and he has the backing of the Sangh Parivar as the PM candidate for the party most likely to win the elections. Whether tactical or strategic this has far reaching implications for Indian society, something all your secular parties have never been able to do.


As Brahmins and upper castes were dominating all spheres of life all along under the guise of Communists and Marxists, then it is more of the same really, nothing to worry.

As far as me being female Uncle Tom goes, that is a laugh really. I have had the blessing to be free of all persecution complexes.
 
What else am I doing?



Oh, so now we need to distinguish ourselves from 'those' Tams. Back to the myth of "Real Scots would never...."

Surprising; I thought you confined yourself to hate mail and never condescended to deal in facts. Of course, now I see why; very wise never to have done so in the past.


Yes, right, the grey eminence behind Jayalalitha's throne. What else? I am truly impressed by your display of political savvy.

you assume too much mr.shearer,u want to talk about facts we can but it is impossible for u to come clean from the deep gutter called marxism.

we are not the same as those tams,it is like whatever myth u want to assume,

we belong to the state of travancore and not thanjavur or mysore.
 
Does this mean I too will get to discriminate and harass people just like my forefathers? :partay:

Most likely you will get a kick on your behind if you attempt that :D If your forefathers did what you say they did, then please hand over all your property to the lower caste in your villages, else stop feigning remorse.
 
That is hogwash. RSS does not believe in caste and they never speak in terms of caste. Only misled and motivated people like you do. Modi belongs to a lower caste and he has the backing of the Sangh Parivar as the PM candidate for the party most likely to win the elections. Whether tactical or strategic this has far reaching implications for Indian society, something all your secular parties have never been able to do.


As Brahmins and upper castes were dominating all spheres of life all along under the guise of Communists and Marxists, then it is more of the same really, nothing to worry.

As far as me being female Uncle Tom goes, that is a laugh really. I have had the blessing to be free of all persecution complexes.

yeah it is very difficult to do this job,sitting and eating taxpayer and contributing zero,

even a very corrupt bueraucrat is harmless compared to these poisonous creatures.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom