You have convinced me that my roots are Central Asian( or what was it). Congrats.
Enough said.
There is obviously some serious problem; either with my telling the tale, or with your hearing and comprehension.
Why should your roots be anything other than Indian, when the Indian genetic composition has not been disturbed since approximately 40,000 years ago?
Why is it so difficult to get on board that a language came into south Asia, and did very well, promoted assiduously by an interested set of people promoting it as a linchpin of society, and promoting also a religious system and a social order? A set of people too small in numbers to affect the genetics, but able to prevail because of complete, unrelenting focus?
If your name had been something else, I might have agreed cordially that you might be central Asian, and turned back to my own interests. If you seriously want to find out, you can get your blood analysed and you can determine what your ancestors were. People in the US with little else to do and more money than they need tend to do this, to amuse themselves.
You have convinced me that my roots are Central Asian( or what was it). Congrats.
Enough said.
It's not that my mind is closed. I have gone through the works of both Max Muller(for eg) and contemporary researchers.
Check this -
“We have conclusively proved that there never existed any Aryans or Dravidians in the Indian sub continent. The Aryan-Dravidian classification was nothing but a misinformation campaign carried out by people with vested interests,” Prof Lalji Singh, vice-chancellor, Banaras Hindu University, told DNA.
The findings of a three-year research by a team of scientists, including Prof Singh and others from various countries, has been published by American Journal of Human Genetics in its issue dated December 9.
“The study effectively puts to rest the argument that south Indians are Dravidians and were driven to the peninsula by Aryans who invaded North India,” said Prof Singh, a molecular biologist and former chief of Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad.
According to Dr Gyaneshwer Chaubey, Estonian Biocentre, Tartu, Estonia, who was another Indian member of the team, the leaders of Dravidian political parties may have to find another answer for their raison d'être. “We have proved that people all over India have common genetic traits and origin. All Indians have the same DNA structure. No foreign genes or DNA has entered the Indian mainstream in the last 60,000 years,” Dr Chaubey said.
Dr Chaubey had proved in 2009 itself that the Aryan invasion theory is bunkum. “That was based on low resolution genetic markers. This time we have used autosomes, which means all major 23 chromosomes, for our studies. The decoding of human genome and other advances in this area help us in unraveling the ancestry in 60,000 years,” he explained.
According to Prof Singh, Dr Chaubey, and Dr Kumarasamy Thangaraj, another member of the team, the findings disprove the caste theory prevailing in India. Interestingly, the team found that instead of Aryan invasion, it was Indians who moved from the subcontinent to Europe. “That’s the reason behind the findings of the same genetic traits in Eurasiain regions,” said Dr Thangaraj, senior scientist, CCMB.
“Africans came to India through Central Asia during 80,000 to 60,000 BCE and they moved to Europe sometime around 30,000 BCE. The Indian Vedic literature and the epics are all silent about the Aryan-Dravidian conflict,” said Dr S Kalyanaraman
Source - New research debunks Aryan invasion theory | Latest News & Updates at DNAIndia.com
Get this point please(if you can) - I am not trying to convince you that the AIT is BS. You can hold on to your hypothesis. I, on the other hand, trust modern genetics, ethnic experts more than the evangelical pastors of the 19th century.
I have to conclude, from the evidence on hand, that you are extremely stupid, as well as being extremely closed-minded.
Several posts back, in fact, in more than one post, I have stated in painful detail that Aryan and Dravidian are NOT racial characteristics, that they refer to language families.
What part of this did you not understand?
And how many repetitions does it take to get you to understand that nobody in his or her right mind holds on to the belief that a horde of marauders swept over the mountain passes in horse-drawn chariots and swooped down on the cities of the plains to plunder them, to extirpate their population, to enslave those who survived, and have an orgy of beef-steak and soma around roaring bonfires?
Come back when you have a piece of humour to equal your earlier efforts, that you are now convinced that you come from Omsk or that you are now convinced you come from central Asia. At least that schoolboy humour is better than this dense incomprehension.