What's new

Ahead of India visit: Terrorist ‘safe havens’ in Pakistan unacceptable, says Obama

.
First of all, please don't start your message with smilies because it looks bad and adds no weight whatsoever to the argument.

Secondly, only an ignorant fool would compare terrorist/traitor Mukti Bahini with Afghan freedom fighters who fought to expel invading Russians from their lands. Mukti Bahini was an Indian-sponsored terrorist organization, composed of traitors of Pakistan, who fought a civil war against its own civilian/military establishment.

Thirdly, East-West Pakistan conflict was brief, following cession from Pakistan, no civil war was fought within Bangladesh unlike Afghanistan, where warlords began to fight with each other after Russian withdrawal. During all this time, Pakistan has been hosting no less than 3 million thankless Afghans, who practically destroyed the very social fabric of Pakistani society. Given the circumstances, Pakistan had no choice but to do whatever possible to bring peace in Afghanistan so the Afghan refugees could be sent back. Indira also state-sponsored Mukti Bahini terrorism in East Pakistan in the pretext of refugee crisis so don't try to play holier than thou.
only Pakistanis say mukti bahini is a terrorist organization and some even regard dalai lama a terrorist.
 
. . . .
Respects for the President, afterall he has to visit their country, such diplomatic statements were expected, and it doesn't matter to us anyway.
 
.
Respects for the President, afterall he has to visit their country, such diplomatic statements were expected, and it doesn't matter to us anyway.
Of course there is no truth in whatever the world has been accusing Pakistan of.

If it mattered to those who have a common feeling of 'doesn't matter to us anyways', and seeing this group prevalent, Pakistan would have been a different place.
 
. .
First of all, please don't start your message with smilies because it looks bad and adds no weight whatsoever to the argument.

Secondly, only an ignorant fool would compare terrorist/traitor Mukti Bahini with Afghan freedom fighters who fought to expel invading Russians from their lands. Mukti Bahini was an Indian-sponsored terrorist organization, composed of traitors of Pakistan, who fought a civil war against its own civilian/military establishment.

Thirdly, East-West Pakistan conflict was brief, following cession from Pakistan, no civil war was fought within Bangladesh unlike Afghanistan, where warlords began to fight with each other after Russian withdrawal. During all this time, Pakistan has been hosting no less than 3 million thankless Afghans, who practically destroyed the very social fabric of Pakistani society. Given the circumstances, Pakistan had no choice but to do whatever possible to bring peace in Afghanistan so the Afghan refugees could be sent back. Indira also state-sponsored Mukti Bahini terrorism in East Pakistan in the pretext of refugee crisis so don't try to play holier than thou.

But there is a difference. Both Mukti Bahini and Afghan Mujahids succeeded in evicting the occupying forces. But that's where the similarity ends. After India's goal was achieved and Pakistani forces were evicted from Bangladesh, India did not try to make Bangladesh a client state. Pakistan did exactly the opposite and started militarily backing one of the faction in Afghanistan which resulted in the civil war in Afghanistan. And it was just a matter of time when that war spilled over into Pakistan. Whoever thought that they could create a national civil war in Afghanistan and keep Pakistan shielded from it were smoking the top variety of an infamous afghan product. :)

PS: Is ending with a smily ok with you

It was just an election stunt.
Yeah!! Osama was never in Pakistan :rofl:
 
. .
India did not try to make Bangladesh a client state.
Correct, and that is why the Indian -sponsored traitor Bangla Bandhoo with his entire family was killed like a dog by none other than the same Bengalis for whom he supposedly won the independence. You my friend need to educate yourself with the history, until than you can keep playing with the smilies hoping that somebody would take your fantasies seriously.
 
.
Correct, and that is why the Indian -sponsored traitor Bangla Bandhoo with his entire family was killed like a dog by none other than the same Bengalis for whom he supposedly won the independence. You my friend need to educate yourself with the history, until than you can keep playing with the smilies hoping that somebody would take your fantasies seriously.
Dude, scattered incidents can only allow you to hide behind sarcasms. Not discuss realities. But then, discussing realities is a concept that is completely alien to most Pakistani members here any way..
 
.
Look at this Obama traitor! He seems to have forgotten that without Pakistan, the US could never have defeated Russia. Without Pakistan, the US would never have become the super power. And I just found out that without Pakistan, Obama could have never won the second term!

After fighting every war of Amreeka, specially the ones which Pakistan had nothing to do with; is this what Pakistan get? hain? If this is not cheating then what is? hain?

Obviously I condomn it.
 
.
Look at this Obama traitor! He seems to have forgotten that without Pakistan, the US could never have defeated Russia. Without Pakistan, the US would never have become the super power. And I just found out that without Pakistan, Obama could have never won the second term!

After fighting every war of Amreeka, specially the ones which Pakistan had nothing to do with; is this what Pakistan get? hain? If this is not cheating then what is? hain?

Obviously I condomn it.
Are you rehearsing for your stand up comedy skit that you'll perform for obama?
 
.
First of all, please don't start your message with smilies because it looks bad and adds no weight whatsoever to the argument.

Secondly, only an ignorant fool would compare terrorist/traitor Mukti Bahini with Afghan freedom fighters who fought to expel invading Russians from their lands. Mukti Bahini was an Indian-sponsored terrorist organization, composed of traitors of Pakistan, who fought a civil war against its own civilian/military establishment.

Thirdly, East-West Pakistan conflict was brief, following cession from Pakistan, no civil war was fought within Bangladesh unlike Afghanistan, where warlords began to fight with each other after Russian withdrawal. During all this time, Pakistan has been hosting no less than 3 million thankless Afghans, who practically destroyed the very social fabric of Pakistani society. Given the circumstances, Pakistan had no choice but to do whatever possible to bring peace in Afghanistan so the Afghan refugees could be sent back. Indira also state-sponsored Mukti Bahini terrorism in East Pakistan in the pretext of refugee crisis so don't try to play holier than thou.
Your ex PM called the Bangladeshis children of pigs openly. I don't know what your sect/creed/caste is but I Guess you'd have created a mukti bahini of your own under the circumstances. Proof below
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom