desiman
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2009
- Messages
- 3,957
- Reaction score
- 0
you must have been paid 75 cents for all this research, great work !!!!
Agni V Discussions
- Thread starter Indian Tiger
- Start date
you must have been paid 75 cents for all this research, great work !!!!
Gessler
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,579
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Thanks brother! Are you really from US?
We seem to be getting a lot of US support here. First USAHawk785 and now Ulysses (that is, if you're american
)Hahaha...these sorta crazy articles by CCTV and its band of crazy "experts" are kept ready-made for
chinese trollers to come and pick up, put them on forums and chest-thump their way to deploration...hahaha!!
Speeder 2
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2010
- Messages
- 2,391
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
This Agni 5 is for 8-year-olds.
1. 5000km is classified as long-distance missile, not intercontinental which is >8000km.
The reentry warhead technology is very different from 5000km to >8000km.
The latter is much much more sophiticated, which are only possessed by US/Rusia/China/France.
India? Sorry, wait till the next life.
2. DRDO´s Indian definition of "accuracy": 1000KM x 600KM
So called Agni `accurately hit the target`....
it's like saying I accurately threw a stone into the target, which has size of a lake 50 yards in front me.
With 1000x600KM, you try to shoot Shanghai and will end up anywhere between the East China sea and Guan,
probabaly half a way to Haiwii.
If you try to aim at beijing, it would end up ranging from North Japan to Seberia...
In comparison, accuracy of China´s DF4 of 1970s was 100X70 km for the first test.
3. 50 tons weight? 6X the Aryan tank? Man, that´s primitive.
So it´s not mobile wahtsoever as DRDO bull$shitted.
4. When DRDO recovers the warhead in the next days, let me know.
I beleive they can´t recover it. It means that its accuracy equals even worse probably = bullcrap.
5. Only after its recovery, show the photo of recovered Agni 5 warhead please?
It can´t. Why? Because it´ll show that it´s been burned into crap during re-entry.
India doesn´t have advanced wind tunnel technologies to test a re-entry warhead
to prevent its melting long before it finishes re-entry.
BTW, only US, Rusia and China have material technology to produce anti-reentry melting
nuke warheads. Not even France and the UK have it. India? Keep dreaming.
6. miniature of nuke warhead:
India even does not have a nuclear warhead small enough to put on the missile.
To miniature the existing one tookk decaded for US-RUS-CHN-FRN.
It would take Indian decades, if ever, provided neither the French nor Rus sell their tech secretly to India.
7. 100kg warhead = primitive 1st generation nuclear tech of 1950s-60s.
In conclusion:
Agni 5 is far less sophiticated than China´s DF4 in warhead and definitly in both accuracy and reentry techologies.
And DF4 was from 1970s...
Yeah, self-boasting so-called `india´s entry into elite club`? elite club of what?
It´s a joke.
1. 5000km is classified as long-distance missile, not intercontinental which is >8000km.
The reentry warhead technology is very different from 5000km to >8000km.
The latter is much much more sophiticated, which are only possessed by US/Rusia/China/France.
India? Sorry, wait till the next life.
2. DRDO´s Indian definition of "accuracy": 1000KM x 600KM
So called Agni `accurately hit the target`....
it's like saying I accurately threw a stone into the target, which has size of a lake 50 yards in front me.
With 1000x600KM, you try to shoot Shanghai and will end up anywhere between the East China sea and Guan,
probabaly half a way to Haiwii.
If you try to aim at beijing, it would end up ranging from North Japan to Seberia...
In comparison, accuracy of China´s DF4 of 1970s was 100X70 km for the first test.
3. 50 tons weight? 6X the Aryan tank? Man, that´s primitive.
So it´s not mobile wahtsoever as DRDO bull$shitted.
4. When DRDO recovers the warhead in the next days, let me know.
I beleive they can´t recover it. It means that its accuracy equals even worse probably = bullcrap.
5. Only after its recovery, show the photo of recovered Agni 5 warhead please?
It can´t. Why? Because it´ll show that it´s been burned into crap during re-entry.
India doesn´t have advanced wind tunnel technologies to test a re-entry warhead
to prevent its melting long before it finishes re-entry.
BTW, only US, Rusia and China have material technology to produce anti-reentry melting
nuke warheads. Not even France and the UK have it. India? Keep dreaming.
6. miniature of nuke warhead:
India even does not have a nuclear warhead small enough to put on the missile.
To miniature the existing one tookk decaded for US-RUS-CHN-FRN.
It would take Indian decades, if ever, provided neither the French nor Rus sell their tech secretly to India.
7. 100kg warhead = primitive 1st generation nuclear tech of 1950s-60s.
In conclusion:
Agni 5 is far less sophiticated than China´s DF4 in warhead and definitly in both accuracy and reentry techologies.
And DF4 was from 1970s...
Yeah, self-boasting so-called `india´s entry into elite club`? elite club of what?
It´s a joke.
This Agni 5 is for 8-year-olds.
1. 5000km is classified as long-distance missile, not intercontinental which is >8000km.
The reentry warhead technology is very different from 5000km to >8000km.
The latter is much much more sophiticated, which are only possessed by US/Rusia/China/France.
India? Sorry, wait till the next life.
2. DRDO´s Indian definition of "accuracy": 1000KM x 600KM
So called Agni `accurately hit the target`....
it's like saying I accurately threw a stone into the target, which has size of a lake 50 yards in front me.
With 1000x600KM, you try to shoot Shanghai and will end up anywhere between the East China sea and Guan,
probabaly half a way to Haiwii.
If you try to aim at beijing, it would end up ranging from North Japan to Seberia...
In comparison, accuracy of China´s DF4 of 1970s was 100X70 km for the first test.
3. 50 tons weight? 6X the Aryan tank? Man, that´s primitive.
So it´s not mobile wahtsoever as DRDO bull$shitted.
4. When DRDO recovers the warhead in the next days, let me know.
I beleive they can´t recover it. It means that its accuracy equals even worse probably = bullcrap.
5. Only after its recovery, show the photo of recovered Agni 5 warhead please?
It can´t. Why? Because it´ll show that it´s been burned into crap during re-entry.
India doesn´t have advanced wind tunnel technologies to test a re-entry warhead
to prevent its melting long before it finishes re-entry.
BTW, only US, Rusia and China have material technology to produce anti-reentry melting
nuke warheads. Not even France and the UK have it. India? Keep dreaming.
6. miniature of nuke warhead:
India even does not have a nuclear warhead small enough to put on the missile.
To miniature the existing one tookk decaded for US-RUS-CHN-FRN.
It would take Indian decades, if ever, provided neither the French nor Rus sell their tech secretly to India.
7. 100kg warhead = primitive 1st generation nuclear tech of 1950s-60s.
In conclusion:
Agni 5 is far less sophiticated than China´s DF4 in warhead and definitly in both accuracy and reentry techologies.
And DF4 was from 1970s...
Yeah, self-boasting so-called `india´s entry into elite club`? elite club of what?
It´s a joke.
GR!FF!N
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2012
- Messages
- 8,706
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
This Agni 5 is for 8-year-olds.
1. 5000km is classified as long-distance missile, not intercontinental which is >8000km.
The reentry warhead technology is very different from 5000km to >8000km.
The latter is much much more sophiticated, which are only possessed by US/Rusia/China/France.
India? Sorry, wait till the next life.
2. DRDO´s Indian definition of "accuracy": 1000KM x 600KM
So called Agni `accurately hit the target`....
it's like saying I accurately threw a stone into the target, which has size of a lake 50 yards in front me.
With 1000x600KM, you try to shoot Shanghai and will end up anywhere between the East China sea and Guan,
probabaly half a way to Haiwii.
If you try to aim at beijing, it would end up ranging from North Japan to Seberia...
In comparison, accuracy of China´s DF4 of 1970s was 100X70 km for the first test.
3. 50 tons weight? 6X the Aryan tank? Man, that´s primitive.
So it´s not mobile wahtsoever as DRDO bull$shitted.
4. When DRDO recovers the warhead in the next days, let me know.
I beleive they can´t recover it. It means that its accuracy equals even worse probably = bullcrap.
5. Only after its recovery, show the photo of recovered Agni 5 warhead please?
It can´t. Why? Because it´ll show that it´s been burned into crap during re-entry.
India doesn´t have advanced wind tunnel technologies to test a re-entry warhead
to prevent its melting long before it finishes re-entry.
BTW, only US, Rusia and China have material technology to produce anti-reentry melting
nuke warheads. Not even France and the UK have it. India? Keep dreaming.
6. miniature of nuke warhead:
India even does not have a nuclear warhead small enough to put on the missile.
To miniature the existing one tookk decaded for US-RUS-CHN-FRN.
It would take Indian decades, if ever, provided neither the French nor Rus sell their tech secretly to India.
7. 100kg warhead = primitive 1st generation nuclear tech of 1950s-60s.
In conclusion:
Agni 5 is far less sophiticated than China´s DF4 in warhead and definitly in both accuracy and reentry techologies.
And DF4 was from 1970s...
Yeah, self-boasting so-called `india´s entry into elite club`? elite club of what?
It´s a joke.
amen...but you should get a life....and check your data... 100 kg warhead????
by the way...india has miniaturised warhead...
by the way..you should read more how you got design of tactical nuke..its all here
kalkitv - Thermonuclear Nukes. Hydrogen Bomb- Miniature W-88 Hydrogen Bomb (1050) Kalki Gaur
faithfulguy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 13,651
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Congrats to India for a successful missile test. I haven't been in here for a while and lack of maturity by trolls on both side should not overshadow this accomplishment. But it is in this forum.
Water Car Engineer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2010
- Messages
- 13,313
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Difference is Agni V is three staged. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Agni V's range is longer than told.
And can that missile's payload be sent to space and back to the target?
Alchemy
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2011
- Messages
- 1,108
- Reaction score
- 0
Thanks SpiritHS , We wish that Vietnam too would have successful missile program to counter the bullying ways of any country !
We can help you with our Brahmos missiles too which is up for export to friendly countries
anathema
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2009
- Messages
- 1,348
- Reaction score
- -1
What kind of stupid, copy paste logic is that ?
Its like saying firing a bullet is a bigger derivative of sending a arrow out a bow ..which in turn is a bigger derivative of Hurling a stone at someone....!! According to your logic all are same....
You are going nowhere with the nonsense that you just wrote. Please stop that demonstrating your absolutely superior non existent thoughts...
Alchemy
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2011
- Messages
- 1,108
- Reaction score
- 0
Speeder 2
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2010
- Messages
- 2,391
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Experts believe that Agni 5 ´s success probability is about 60%.
So objectively speaking, what has this Agni 5 launch proves?
This Agni 5 launch proves:
That with 60% sheer luck of not expoiting in mid air, India has
managed to make use of Russian rocket tech(for civilian satellites) to
launch a large pile of bruned up iron crap ( its hypothetical `warhead`,
at least on paper like india´s first `nuclear`sub without nuclear reactor, has surely
been vaporised during re-entry) into a right direction say towards north (by luck -- not
guranteed next time), 5000km away anywhere within the area of 1000km X 600km, say
in an area among Russia, Mongolia, China, Korea, Japan, Philippines...it´s anyone´s guess.
I, for one, welcome India into Elite Club of...
...Bull$hit...
So objectively speaking, what has this Agni 5 launch proves?
This Agni 5 launch proves:
That with 60% sheer luck of not expoiting in mid air, India has
managed to make use of Russian rocket tech(for civilian satellites) to
launch a large pile of bruned up iron crap ( its hypothetical `warhead`,
at least on paper like india´s first `nuclear`sub without nuclear reactor, has surely
been vaporised during re-entry) into a right direction say towards north (by luck -- not
guranteed next time), 5000km away anywhere within the area of 1000km X 600km, say
in an area among Russia, Mongolia, China, Korea, Japan, Philippines...it´s anyone´s guess.
I, for one, welcome India into Elite Club of...
...Bull$hit...
SinoChallenger
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2011
- Messages
- 3,523
- Reaction score
- 0
The Chinese government already responded to india's bragging claims:Experts believe that Agni 5 ´s success probability is about 60%.
So objectively speaking, what has this Agni 5 launch proves?
This Agni 5 launch proves:
That with 60% sheer luck of not expoiting in mid air, India has
managed to make use of Russian rocket tech(for civilian satellites) to
launch a large pile of bruned up iron crap ( its hypothetical `warhead`,
at least on paper like india´s first `nuclear`sub without nuclear reactor, has surely
been vaporised during re-entry) into a right direction say towards north (by luck -- not
guranteed next time), 5000km away anywhere within the area of 1000km X 600km, say
in an area among Russia, Mongolia, China, Korea, Japan, Philippines...it´s anyone´s guess.
I, for one, welcome India into Elite Club of...
...Bull$hit...
1. Agni-V is terribly inaccurate. indians have yet to master any re-entry related technology.
2. Agni-V is heavy, immobile and not survivable.
3. Agni-V will not be in service for quite a few years.
Besides, look at Iran. Iran has better ballistic missiles than india and Iran doesn't pretend it is a global superpower. China's DF-4 is equivalent to the Agni-V but back in the 70's and 80's when we developed this, we didn't consider ourselves a global superpower either.
Bottom line: india managed to manufacture a rocket that can go to first stage separation without blowing up...... but, as usual, they are exaggering themselves to such a degree they are a joke again. Looks like another 1962 spanking is in order to put them in their place!
