Great Sachin
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,931
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
Chinese govt is quite conservative, or very polite I see.
Like what I said earlier, in reality it would take about a decade just to familiarise with re-entry tech that India doesn’t have.
…let alone a decade more, if not decades or ever, to have tech ready for miniaturation of nuke warhead which India has’t either.
Then only after those, you meet the real challenge: advanced materials science that could make the nuke warhead intact during re-entry. Only USA, China, Russia have this tech so far. I believe both UK and France are buying that from the states.
…
To say Agni V is an equivalent to China´s DF-4 of 1970s is an insult to the latter:
DF-4 is in fact streets ahead of Agni V even though categorily they belong to the same generation.
DF-4 were in service, secretly tested countless times, proved, and improved, with proper nuke warhead, and quite mature re-entry tech during late 70s, early 80s. None of those Agni V has.
DF-4´s accuray is staggering 10X better than Agni V´s!
If DF-4 is F-16 Block50, then Agni V is LCA Tejas on paper.
Agni V, I suspect, will eventually become another infamous Indian white elephant, just like Tejas, Aryan tank, etc.
I will tell you basic difference China missile based on liquid fuel and India Agni 5 is having solid fuel more advance.....
As long as it hits your capital I dont care anything