mustafa erkan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2015
- Messages
- 633
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
AKSUNGUR and AKINCI are big uavs and their radar signatures are more than tb2 and anka. How can be the new concept?
My opinion sending tb2 ,anka and anka+ in front of akinci within the range of its bvr missiles to air coverege against enemy jets.
Anka+ May be the first one flying at high altitude and be the first one attacking to enemy SAMs.
Then tb2s and anka hits the important soft targets.
Aksungur and akinci hit hard targets.
May be akinci may use in different configurations like A2A and EW to support other uavs attacks.
F 16s and awacs support Uavs from the back side and dont take risks.
One important thing these uavs have enough range to attack targets like Lna in Libya and turn back to Turkey. It gives ability to attack long range targets in range of satellite communication with minimum risks.
My opinion sending tb2 ,anka and anka+ in front of akinci within the range of its bvr missiles to air coverege against enemy jets.
Anka+ May be the first one flying at high altitude and be the first one attacking to enemy SAMs.
Then tb2s and anka hits the important soft targets.
Aksungur and akinci hit hard targets.
May be akinci may use in different configurations like A2A and EW to support other uavs attacks.
F 16s and awacs support Uavs from the back side and dont take risks.
One important thing these uavs have enough range to attack targets like Lna in Libya and turn back to Turkey. It gives ability to attack long range targets in range of satellite communication with minimum risks.