Anyways, whatever resistance was there has been crushed by local Kashmiris only.
Dont quote Pakistan here, We have not oprssed them in any way.
We dont have AFSPAS
The links states otherwise:
Murder in Uniform – Kashmir’s infamous “fake encounter” | Tribune International (Australia)
Another atrocity in Kashmir - The Hindu
MediaJotIndian Army Shows Extreme Atrocities in Kashmir
Keep your B.S lies such as resistance was crushed by Local Kashmiris to yourself
1. The Government of Pakistan should undertake to use its best endeavours:
(a) To secure the withdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals not normally resident therein who have entered the State for the purpose of fighting, and to prevent any intrusion into the State of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the State;
2. The Government of India should:
(a) When it is established to the satisfaction of the Commission set up in accordance with the Council's resolution 39 (1948) that the tribesmen are withdrawing and that arrangements for the cessation of the fighting have become effective, put into operation in consultation with the Commission a plan for with-drawing their own forces from Jammu and Kashmir and reducing them progressively to the minimum strength required for the support of the civil power in the maintenance of law and order;
Hi,
Typical selective reading to suits one needs, A disgusting display of Biased view
However, both India and Pakistan failed to arrive at a truce agreement due to differences over interpretation of the procedure for and the extent of demilitarisation. One sticking point was whether the Azad Kashmiri army was to be disbanded during the truce stage or at the plebiscite stage.
In November 1948, although both the Indian and Pakistani governments agreed to hold the plebiscite, the failure of Pakistan to withdraw its troops from Kashmir was a violation of the agreed conditions for holding it and the process stalled.
[33] Furthermore, the Indian Government distanced itself from its previous commitment to hold a plebiscite. India then proposed that Pakistan withdraw all its troops first, calling it a precondition for a plebiscite. Pakistan rejected the proposal on the grounds that the Kashmiris would be unable to vote freely in the presence of the Indian army and in the light of the friendship between Sheikh Abdullah and Indian Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. However, Pakistan proposed simultaneous withdrawal of all troops followed by a plebiscite under international aegis, which India rejected. As a result, Pakistani forces did not unilaterally withdraw
