INDIC
BANNED
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 18,512
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
No, because unlike Europeans and a few other people outside of Europe you have actually nothing to do with them other than adopting their language. Nothing more. As I told you then genetic tests do not lie. You can show that up your ***. It's as ridiculous as claiming that Nigerians cluster with Europeans based on them speaking an Indo-European LANGUAGE or similar Bengalis/Indians/Sri Lankan's.
Yet all ME people cluster especially Semitic people. Even if we assume that they spoke a totally different language they would still cluster with each other.
Just like Dravidian speakers in India cluster with non-Dravidian speakers. You know why? Because both are native to India and of local origin.
Unlike you I am partial European and know much more about genetics than most users here.
Almost all Indians have 40-70% of Indo-European ancestry and rest of the Dravidian ancestry, so by your logic Indians are qualified to claim the Roman Empire as their own, since you claimed Babylon and Sumer belonged to Saudis Arabs based on Semitic Nationalism
![OMG HAHA :omghaha: :omghaha:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/15042.gif)
![OMG HAHA :omghaha: :omghaha:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/15042.gif)
![OMG HAHA :omghaha: :omghaha:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/15042.gif)