INDIC
BANNED
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 18,512
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@al-Hasani Getting inspiration from your hypothetical Semitic Nationalism, I am thinking of claiming Achaemenid Empire based on our common Indo-Iranian origin or Julius Caeser based on our common Indo-European origin.![]()
You Indians do not cluster with neither Europeans and not even Iranians so you have nothing to claim. You should rather claim the made-up race that you invented yesterday called the "Indian" race.![]()
You are repeating the same thing over and over again. I'm using voice assist for this discussion, by the way.
Read the freaking links man.
If Babylon can belong to Saudi Arabs according to your logic, by that logic even Indians can even claim Roman Empire based on a common Indo-European origin.BTW our Indian race is older than your Arabs identity.
![]()
Proto-Indo-Europeans - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaYou Indians (Bengalis, Sri Lankan's etc. included) do not cluster with neither Europeans and not even Iranians so you have nothing to claim. Don't confuse some vague linguistic families with actual genetics. You should rather claim the made-up race that you invented yesterday called the "Indian" race.
Also who is claiming anything in this thread?
A 2013 conference of the American Society of Human Genetics with more than 10 scientists participating concluded that there was "no indication of Khazar genetic ancestry among Ashkenazi Jews".[125]
Don't make up lies "Indian" or whatever ethnic group you belong to. You are completely clueless about this field as I proved yesterday. Nobody claimed that. Saudi Arabian is less than 85 years old. Saudi Arabians are just Arabs and Semites. I provided historical references, genetics tests, linguistic tests etc. You were the one making outrageous claims. I was talking about Semitic cultures and people. Long before any nation states were known.
There is still nothing called a Indian race. Google shows nothing. Nor is that even known. Older? I doubt that any ethic group in India is older than any NATIVE Middle Eastern people. In fact Indian was not even populated by humans when humans already lived in the ME.
You still don't get it do you? You Indians are native to the Indian Subcontinent. You have no genetic affinity with Europeans.
Try not to act too much as a clown. Just for once.
Proto-Indo-Europeans - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
dude when we compare your country's history/achievements with India ....
since Saudi arabians have a richer history than India.Since when do language groups equal genetics Azeri?
@INDIC
There is noting called an Indo-European people. It's a linguistic group. Don't tell me that Portugeuse people cluster with Bengalis or Indians
But all Semitic people do because they are all from the ME. Very simple. Genetics don't lie.
Nigerians also speak English.![]()
Since when do language groups equal genetics Azeri?
@INDIC
There is noting called an Indo-European people. It's a linguistic group. Don't tell me that Portugeuse people cluster with Bengalis or Indians.Sorry to burst your bobble but they do NOT.
But all Semitic people do because they are all from the ME. Very simple. Genetics don't lie. Not only paternal lineages but overall genetics.
Besides ME peopel cluster much more with nearby Europeans for historical reasons and due to geographic proximity.
Nigerians also speak English.![]()
There are things that I can't discuss, but know this that there is a reason for trying to disprove him study.
Mostly religious reasons.
since Saudi arabians have a richer history than India.
dude do humanity a favour and read sth.![]()
Semitic is just an anthropological term just like Indo-European/Indo-Iranian or Tibeto-Burmese people.
Here is our great Indo-European nationalism just like your hypothetical Semitic nationalism.
![]()
Yes, do you know about this.
Kurgan hypothesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We too can have a Indo-European Nationalism just like your hypothetical semitic Nationalism.![]()
They call arabs anti Semitic its like the only Semitic group in the world is the jews infact the jews who are anti Semitic the arabs have more Semitic blood than the European jewsSince when do language groups equal genetics Azeri?
@INDIC
There is noting called an Indo-European people. It's a linguistic group. Don't tell me that Portugeuse people cluster with Bengalis or Indians.Sorry to burst your bobble but they do NOT.
But all Semitic people do because they are all from the ME. Very simple. Genetics don't lie. Not only paternal lineages but overall genetics.
Besides ME people cluster much more with nearby Europeans for historical reasons and due to geographic proximity. REGARDLESS of linguistic groups which have nothing to do with ancestry most of the time.
Nigerians also speak English.![]()