ABM for Pakistan...!

[BHarwana]

First thing first why Pakistan needs ABM?

Pakistan is going for SAM rather than ABM. For ABM Pakistan is developing Ababeel as deterrence.

 

[Ultima Thule]

First thing first why Pakistan needs ABM?

Pakistan is going for SAM rather than ABM. For ABM Pakistan is developing Ababeel as deterrence.

So how we will defend our self from the threats of Indian BMs and i agree with you that we need a long range SAms as well @BHarwana

 

[BHarwana]

So how we will defend our self from the threats of Indian BMs and i agree with you that we need a long range SAms as well @BHarwana

By deterrence it is as simple as that induct ababeel if they launch BM fire one back. MAD policy is the best defence. Look at Russia they went for more effective missiles rather than ABM. A nation with ABM will always be on the receiving end of the nukes.

 

[pzfz]

ABMs are ineffective, currently. Concentrate on offensive firepower.

 

[Ultima Thule]

By deterrence it is as simple as that induct ababeel if they launch BM fire one back. MAD policy is the best defence. Look at Russia they went for more effective missiles rather than ABM. A nation with ABM will always be on the receiving end of the nukes.

No whole MAD concept is to we have stronger Defense than enemy from the BM, If you have no Shield against enemy BMs than you're not able to retaliate and parish @BHarwana

 

[BHarwana]

No whole MAD concept is to we have stronger Defense than enemy from the BM, If you have no Shield against enemy BMs than you're not able to retaliate and parish @BHarwana

Nope when you have solid fuel missile systems with mirv warheads it is a dream of other that they can avoid a nuclear strike. The recent failure of ABM in Saudi Yemen is a big lesson for every one the only true surety is MAD.

 

[Ultima Thule]

The recent failure of ABM in Saudi Yemen is a big lesson for every one the only true surety is MAD.

no you talking about PAC-2 which is basically a SAMs had bad hit ratio against BM, but PAC-3 and its upgrade PAC-3 MSE, THAAD, S-400 is nearly 100 % hit rate against MRBM @BHarwana

 

[The Accountant]

no you talking about PAC-2 which is basically a SAMs had bad hit ratio against BM, but PAC-3 and its upgrade PAC-3 MSE, THAAD, S-400 is nearly 100 % hit rate against MRBM @BHarwana

Not even close to 100% in battle conditions ... In battle condition adversary use the weakest spot of your defences whereas in test scenario ideal conditions are provided ... ABM are suitable only in a given situation ... There is a reason US is installing ballistic missle batteries in Korea and Europe so that ideal conditions can be met but in case of Pakistan achieving ideal conditions are really difficult as response time is few minutes ...

 

[Ultima Thule]

Not even close to 100% in battle conditions ... In battle condition adversary use the weakest spot of your defences whereas in test scenario ideal conditions are provided ... ABM are suitable only in a given situation ... There is a reason US is installing ballistic missle batteries in Korea and Europe so that ideal conditions can be met but in case of Pakistan achieving ideal conditions are really difficult as response time is few minutes ...

They have layered ABM for every kind of BM targets ICBM to SRBM, in India Pakistan scenario radars are working 24/7 so if we have BM attack from India we do a push big red button to launch ABM interceptor to intercept enemy BM @The Accountant

 

[The Accountant]

They have layered ABM for every kind of BM targets ICBM to SRBM, in India Pakistan scenario radars are working 24/7 so if we have BM attack from India we do a push big red button to launch ABM interceptor to intercept enemy BM @The Accountant

not possible, it will take time for radars to analyze the ballistic missile, its trajectory and other factors and to suggest a suitable interceptor ... It is really difficult even seconds are important

 

[Ultima Thule]

not possible, it will take time for radars to analyze the ballistic missile, its trajectory and other factors and to suggest a suitable interceptor ... It is really difficult even seconds are important

Within seconds those works will be done through radars @undertakerwwefan

 

[The Accountant]

Within seconds those works will be done through radars @undertakerwwefan

Not really ... Radars can accurately predict the trajectory at ballistic phase ... How can radar predict the rising phase ... They dont know when missile fuel will end and from there only predictable ballistic trajectory starts ..
Befire that the guess work could be wrong upto several 100 kms

 

[Ultima Thule]

Not really ... Radars can accurately predict the trajectory at ballistic phase ... How can radar predict the rising phase ... They dont know when missile fuel will end and from there only predictable ballistic trajectory starts ..
Befire that the guess work could be wrong upto several 100 kms

It doesn't matter when the enemy's BM fuel will end, if Indian BM fires through central/west India we will detect to our long range radar in boost phase YLC-2, and US AESA @The Accountant

 

[Chimgathar]

ABM is out of our league, however Russian Pantsir-S1 can be good option for defense against cruise missiles, provided Russia sells us the system.

 

[The Accountant]

ABM is out of our league, however Russian Pantsir-S1 can be good option for defense against cruise missiles, provided Russia sells us the system.

Defensive systems are not issue ... Real issue is integration with command and control system as it will require sharing source code ...