Now people are going to be blame me for having such a negative view of my home country, but I am telling the truth,
However you're not "telling the truth" you're just making statements and wild accusations based on a lack of understanding mostly fuelled by propaganda.
Maybe it is time to abandon our status as the "Islamic" "Republic" of Pakistan, and return to our secular roots which were planned by the fathers of the nation. Pakistan was created because Jinnah and co were afraid that in a Hindu dominated Country, there would always be episodes of violence and disagreement between the two chief religions, as Muslims of India had grown to become an almost different culture.
What secular roots?
The
objective resolution was adopted on March 1st 1949 (2 years after Pakistan regained its independence a mere 7 months following the death of Jinnah) to let the world and everyone who resided in Pakistan after its independence know that it was a nation that was to be structured on the principles of Islam. This resolution was promulgated by our first Prime Minister
Liaquat Ali Khan who worked alongside Jinnah and knew better than anyone what he and the other "founding fathers" wanted considering he is deemed one of them.
Jinnah himself stated that Pakistan must be based on the principles of "Islamic Socialism not other -isms" (i.e. not secularism) during his March 26, 1948 speech in Chittagong:
Furthermore, Jinnah himself stated on his April 18, 1948 (4 months before he died) address to the students of Edwards College in Peshawar:
“I am happy to see better things here. What more can one really expect than to see that this mighty land has now been brought under a rule, which is Islamic, Muslim rule, as a sovereign independent State.”
During his speech at the Darbar in Sibi, Balochistan on February 14, 1948 Jinnah stated:
“ . . . I have one underlying principle in mind, the principle of Muslim democracy. It is my belief that our salvation lies in following the golden rules of conduct set for us by our great law giver, the Prophet of Islam. Let us lay the foundation of our democracy on the basis of truly Islamic ideals and principles. Our Almighty has taught us that 'our decisions in the affairs of the State shall be guided by discussions and consultations'."
If possible pick up the book "Secular Jinnah & Pakistan: What The Nation Doesn't Know" by Saleena Karim. She makes it clear that Jinnah was totally committed to a Pakistan governed by the Quran and Sunnah and dispels the lie that he wanted a secularist state.
When you're referring to the " founding fathers" of the nation who are you talking about? The name Pakistan was formulated by
Chaudhary Rehmat Ali, the creation of Pakistan had been pushed by men like
Sir Syed Khan and
Allama Iqbal since at least 1906 all of whom are Islamic nationalists and/or seeking the independence of our nation that would operate in accordance with the Quran and Sunnah.
This wasn't something that happened overnight or even in 1940 the fact is Pakistan was achieving its independence regardless of what anyone said/wanted particularly the Hindu (the very same people that partnered with the British, French, Dutch and Portuguese to bring down the Mughal Empire). I've discussed this before on other posts but
Pakistan has never been a part of "India" our history and civilization are completely different from that of India's many of whose people have been perpetuating lies alongside colonialists for over a century which I've discussed in detail on a number of posts including the following:
Hurriyat leader meets Pakistan envoy after talks called off | Page 4
What Pakistan needs is a complete overhaul of the government and to some extent the military leadership and to place good, nationalist Muslims in charge who run the nation in accordance with the Quran and Sunnah.
they don't have time for a family of murdered Ahmaids, Shias, Chrisitans, Hindus, etc. But of course it is all Mossad's, RAW's and CIA's fault, because they have so much time and resources to waste on us.
A lot of the blame does fall on various foreign intelligence agencies considering their history is replete with destabilizing other countries and anyone who would deny this is living a lie.
You already had two incidences where American spies (ex. R. Davis and J. Coxx) were caught running around the country and in the case of Davis the US government outright lied about his credentials and reason for being in Pakistan.
In the case of RAW both American and Indian sources confirm that India trained, armed and even embedded their troops within the Mukhti Bahini terrorist organization that went around slaughtering Bengali's and particularly Bihari's within Bangladesh before and during the '71 war.
So please excuse us for being aggressive and hostile towards them.
Can a mature, mentally healthy human being actually believe such far fetched stories? Is this the result of one or two generations of cousin-cousin breeding?
"far fetched stories"?
At one time the idea of secret prisons littered around the world operated by US intelligence where people who were kidnapped and then tortured or large scale spy programs which included illegal wiretaps was thought to be a work of fiction only present in spy novels until they were exposed.
BBC NEWS | Americas | Bush admits to CIA secret prisons
BBC News - Edward Snowden: Leaks that exposed US spy programme
Just a quick side note first cousins getting married and producing offspring increases the risk of deformities by 1.7-2.8% above the general population risk so I doubt that most of your detractors, assuming they even fall into this category, have had their mental capacity affected in any way.
http://www.sbgm.org.br/artigos/artigo_aconselhamento.pdf
Also considering the prevalence of cousins getting married in Japan (as high as 5.9-14.7% in the 60s) is something like 4 times higher than the US and the former consistently ranks higher on international testing should be indicative of that. In fact Japan's former PM Kan Naoto is married to his first cousin.
It is rather ironic you mention UAE, KSA and Qatar, who are infamous for using SLAVE labor from Nepal, India and our beloved Pakistan.
People choosing to travel and work in Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar isn't slavery.
Saudi Arabia (like virtually all of Europe, Canada or the US) have not even signed the UN's "International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families" and their laws along with their practices are very well known so those who venture there know what they're getting into
There may be a few people kept against their will in Saudi Arabia and there definitely will be workers who are abused but the same holds true in the US and Canada. Obviously rampant physical abuse of employees is something all countries should crack down on but in the end the people who work there went of their own free will and knew the conditions
