Want to contradict on TWO points:
1. Transparency on funds - It can't be said with 100% surety that they have 100% transparency in funding, they just say that they are completely transparent.
Not on funds, on earnings of politicians. Here in Germany politicians have started to openly show their earnings on their websites or make them available to the public. When you can see how much money they earn and from which sides they get money, it's why harder to bribe them or to buy political power for your own cause. And isn't corruption the main reason why AAM / AAP were born?
The more you force politicians, government officiers and employees to be transparent, the more you can reduce the corruption in India.
2. Direct Democracy - It is the biggest JOKE for a country like India with 120 crore people.
That's why I said on state level! It's good to deal with local issues and partialy on national levels too (energy, infrastructure for example), but not for defence, or foreign policy of course. Other countries have shown that it can work, so why shouldn't it in India? In fact, this is the perfect time for India and direct democracy, becaus the Indian voter is young and politically active. When you want to include the public, you have to include them and not only wait till they are as old as the politicians.
Just say for eg. let's say that the Govt. want to decide on the price of LPG cylinders, they ask directly to the people & ofcourse even the richest person will say that they should be priced as low as it can be (much better - FREE), but than where is ECONOMICS in all this???
Wrong, because if they are free or very cheap, not rich have even more benefits than the poor. Look at AAPs promise about the free water now. Sounds good, but makes no sense unless you also take to account how mach a family requires. A family with 3 people will have way more of 700l free water than a family of 5 and at the end the smaller family must pay less, because the 700l covers more of their requirement. Same goes for LPG, a poorer family often includes more people, which means they require more LPG. So it's not the prize of LPG that is the problem, but their consumption. A rich family with just 1 kid, that also cook even less than in the past doesn't consume much LPG. So reducing the price is an even bigger advantage for them again.
or will ask to emotional people on streets???
Or will turn crazy and simply attack Pakistan, because their voters would require such a move, isn't that what the BJP is likely to do? So they are not perfect either, just like the Congress has it's problems too and you shouldn't judge AAP as a whole just because of these recent issues.
I still hope that they will calm down a bit, try to get rid of useless people in their party (the law minister should be the first one) and learn what governance means. If they then find a way to combine the responsibility with their ideas as much as possible, they can have a positive effect on India. Be it directly with their work, or indirectly because they force other parties to change.
