I am assuming you are not a blind bhagat and using logic to say what you are saying...with that getting into debate with you..please don't disappoint on that front...rest all if fine...
Giving subsidy is not the eventual solution but is a temporary provision. I praise their intent which is what I like about them and which is not something I have found in others including Modi. And I am willing to give them that time...
That is what everyone is challenging...subsidy is not the solution as you also agree so shouldn't we talk about intent when they show/talk about their plans on how they are going to keep the promise without subsidy...shouldn't that be our parameter for measuring the intent??
Also may i ask what actions/intent you were expecting from Modi that he hasn't shown so far??..I appreciate your point about giving time to AAP however then let's do it both ways(don't criticize/don't praise unless some real action is performed)..
This may have been going on but not to this extent. You have an Parliamentarian who calls for death of people who convert, speaks of mass reproduction, other calls people "Haramzaade", Love Jihad etc. All this was limited to non-state actors during UPA term but right now, even the law makers are coming out with these kind statements,
Now i will give you benefit of doubt here..however my request please don't make comments unless and until you have done enough research on this subject...Since ages these so called law-makers have been doing appeasement politics...they have divided us on the basis of caste/creed/religion and what not...heck..these law-makers have created riots killing hundreds and thousands of people and you are complaining about some comments which as per are a new phenomenon??
It is just AAP has a very small lifespan in politics that you may be finding them some god send people however people like Somnath Bharti have used very un-parliamentary language during his 49 days stint at office...So once again - things are blown out of proportion...Mind it i am not supporting these languages, be it any party...All i am saying is that just because BJP is in power hence anything related with Hindu orthodox mentality is shown as some pre-planned RSS agenda out there to ruin our social fabrics is absolute nonsense...
Earlier people weren't forced to convert(at least in modern India) but is happening now.... So yes, things have definitely changed for worse...
This is equivalent to saying earlier rapes(or Gang Rapes) were not happening...Bro..this is pure BS....as said earlier..conversions were on...heaps and heaps of hindus have been converted by luring them with money...have u ever heard Parliament getting stuck for that?? let's not have securalism going in one direction...b/w just for records i am a Sikh....
We live in a democratic country and all citizens have the freedom of expression. All the statements you mentioned are their personal statements and is not the party's official stand.
Anything that is anti-national and that too coming from very senior people can't be brushed aside like this...Just imagine Sonia Gandhi/Advani or heck even Modi saying something like that...Can that be attributed to some personal comments?? For example - see what happened to Advani when he praised Zinnah and called him secular..
And before you jump to conclude that look even BJP law makers have the same rights so why just corner them, let me remind you that these statements are controversial but do not intend to cause harm or hate towards other section of people which is not the case with the statements of BJP members....
Now this is not calling spade a spade...Anything on Kashmir for that matter is a serious subject given the sensitivity about it...and such statements simply helps those separatist pigs carry on with their agenda which harms our national interests!!...Anyhow my point here is not to post-marten what was said and what not..but to say...individuals comments can't be attributed to entire party's official stand...this should be true for all parties and not just AAP...also think...out of 320 odd MP's if couple have spoken something(which has been denounced by the party and even the PM) should we hold the entire lot accountable for it?? of-course political parties and to some extent Media will want us to do that however shouldn't we be applying our own mind??
Educated people also have diverse opinions, just because one doesn't agree to other's POV, doesn't mean that spade is not being called a spade...
Who is saying that diverse opinions can't be there...however praising subsidy and attributing it to intent is what i am challenging...you supporting AAP on corruption plank or Lokpal or any other point is something that i will have no objection to...
When I say that Modi cares only for his industrial friends and ignores the poor, I am calling spade a spade which you may not agree. So my friend everyone have their own POV's.
Please enlighten me about those actions of Modi where you believe he is helping his so called industrial friends and is against poor...POV's is fine however i am sure you would agree that POV's should be based upon some solid facts...right??
you think AAP came into power based on just subsidy promises? If subsidy was the only selling point then Congress would have not lost the election so badly as they did roll out many such programs before elections...
where did i claim that?? No Party comes to power on one point..however can we say that Electricity/Water promise is not one of the most important reason for AAP cashing in on all the non-bjp votes belonging to so called other parties(which enjoys larger chunk of poor and minorities) apart from their own vote bank??
I agree with that but did that happen in the last 67 years? No I don't think so, So what could be the reason for that?
Exactly..why?? bcoz subsidy is one way to lure poors...and this is one class that vote like anything...Stupid Middle class hardly used to vote...and when you subsidize you are left with that much little funds to develop economic growth magnet..i.e. infra....corruption stops subsidy from reaching the poor...so in the end neither we get development nor are able to help poors....
Now just a question...check the amount that is required for subsidizing electricity/water alone..and then do maths...now imagine all that money used by AAP(which is so far clean on corruption front) for infra development in Delhi...think how much jobs and economic activity will that trigger...this is true my friend...there are no free lunches...
Sangh Parivar and their foot soldiers won't be proud of him as he would probably be an obstacle for them from fulfilling their goal.... And let me also tell you that there are many people who Indians can be proud of....
how on this earth he will stop Sangh Pariwar from fulfilling their agenda...and b/w what is their agenda....anyhow i am just worrying the plight of non-hindus in more than half of India as these states are run by their stooges...BJP
Majority of states now ruled by BJP or its allies : India, News - India Today
Dude please give some respect to the social fabrics of this country...we have a very long history of tolerance...nobody can damage that thing...!! Let's not become mouthpiece of some propaganda...RSS roots in this country are even before Kejriwal's Dad was born...if in all this time period they have not managed to fulfill their so called agenda then they never will...
