As long as those guyz aren't blowing themselves up I don't think I will take them seriously.
No they don't blow up themselves rather they kill Those who go to Churches High caste temple and those who eat beaf
and Father of a Nation
And Your PM happens to be member of very same Fanatic Org.
As if it was stamped by the PM of India himself.
Ofcourse approved by Butcher of Gujrat he is member of RSS and we all know who control Indian politics
How Hindu Nationalists Took Over India
The movement seeks to advance the aims of a minority, but relies upon a much broader constituency for its support.
By Nandini Deo
May 31, 2016
The last Indian general election concluded on May 12, 2014. Initial predictions were for the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) – the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led coalition – to capture 220 out of 545 seats. In fact, the BJP alone won 282, while the NDA coalition combined won 336. The scale of the BJP’s victory – and certainly the possibility that the party could win an absolute majority on its own – was not predicted or anticipated by even the most seasoned observers of Indian politics. Almost two years later a number of questions persist: How do we explain the surprising results of the election? What does the election indicate about the broader Hindu nationalist movement and its success? And how has the party (and the movement) used its time in office thus far?
It is worth noting that because of India’s first-past-the-post electoral system, the BJP won 51.7 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha despite winning only 31 percent of the popular vote. Thus, one should not exaggerate the extent of this victory in terms of it signifying some sweeping political consensus. Many accounts of the election and its aftermath have suggested that the public broadly embraced the Hindu nationalist movement. It is more accurate to say that almost a third of the electorate selected the BJP’s campaign platform over the alternatives.
The BJP is the political party of the Hindu nationalist movement, which consists of about three dozen organizations that are united by a commitment to an ideology of
Hindutva. This ideology is based on the assertion that India is the homeland of Hindus (broadly defined to also include Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs). As the Hindu homeland, the state should serve as a champion of Hindus and their interests. The ideology papers over the many differences among Hindus, especially of caste and language, while emphasizing the separation between most Indians and their Muslim and Christian compatriots. These ideas are based on a fabricated historical narrative and poor sociology, but their aim is not to accurately describe India as much as to create new facts on the ground.
http://thediplomat.com/2016/06/how-hindu-nationalists-took-over-india/
Narendra Modi’s India, where the Hindus are holier than thou
World View: Hindu nationalists have long made it clear that those of other faiths are in the land of Krishna only on sufferance
The Independent Online
With the landslide election of Narendra Modi nearly two years ago, the Hindu spirit found full political expression for the first time, with a sannyasin, no less, a Hindu renunciate, in command. Getty
You may not have heard of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. Neither had I. They sound like exactly the sort of American busybodies you don’t need coming around, asking impertinent questions and compiling arrogant reports: post-colonialists masquerading as Mary Poppins, with a Band Aid for all the world’s problems.
So I sympathise with the Indian government of Narendra Modi when it announced that it was declining to issue this organisation with visas. True, the Commission has tramped around several other countries that can hardly have been eager to roll out the welcome mat: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China, Vietnam, Burma. More fool those countries, all of which have plenty to be ashamed of.
India, by contrast, has only reasons for pride. With the landslide election of Narendra Modi nearly two years ago, the Hindu spirit found full political expression for the first time, with a sannyasin, no less, a Hindu renunciate, in command.
READ MORE
Indian police 'tell raped women to stay silent to protect their honour
Finally, after the centuries of foreign domination followed by the socialists and appeasers of the Congress party, this sage of nations could chart its true destiny: rediscovering the course of the long-buried Saraswati river, rebuilding the temple of Ayodhya, birthplace of the god-king Rama – and ensuring that the nation’s economy, like that of Modi-ji’s home state of Gujarat, gallops ahead.
It is of course a fact that India is not entirely populated by Hindus, but as Hindu nationalists have long made it clear, those of other faiths need to understand that they are in the land of Krishna only on sufferance. If they inflame Hindus’ feelings, there is often little that the Union government, far away in New Delhi, can do about it.
This was the case, for example, with Mohammad Akhlaq Saifi, a 56-year-old Muslim resident of Dadri village in Uttar Pradesh: when rumours spread that he and his family had celebrated the festival of Eid by eating the meat of a murdered cow, the local people became enraged and took their revenge on him. This followed the discovery of meat in his refrigerator which they assumed to be that of the cow in question.
The local people were quite wrong to stone Mr Akhlaq to death. It is also unfortunate that the meat in his fridge proved to be goat. But those family members who survive him, instead of bleating to the media about lynch mobs, might be better advised to become vegetarians.
Given India’s vast distances, what can government be expected to do about such events? That applies equally to Professor Kalburgi of Karnataka state, shot to death in his home in 2014 by unknown assailants. No one should suffer such an end. Equally, no one should be as rash as Dr Kalburgi had been, describing the worship of images of Krishna, Shiva etc, as “meaningless ritual”, going so far as to say they could be urinated on. He must have been well aware of the risks. His attackers have yet to be found.
India, as the Indian Embassy in Washington puts it, “is a vibrant pluralistic society founded on strong democratic principles”. But that does not mean people are exempt from using their common sense.
It stands to reason that Hindus should feel more at home in India than Muslims or Christians, who would be well advised to move to Pakistan or Europe. Once there, nothing would prevent them applying for a visa to pay a sentimental return visit.
Given India’s vast distances, what can government be expected to do about lynch mobs
If you're planning to post more such offtopics then tag me in an appropriate thread.
Face saving??
