JawadKKhan
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2014
- Messages
- 313
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Exactly, they are poorly equipped. Imagine the FC & checkposts in Balochistan and KP even didn't had automatic machine guns till mid-2000s.. They have improved but still need much better.What do these outposts even look like? If an outpost can't defend being outnumbered 5:1, then there's no point in there being an outpost anyway because it will be torched by militants. Every fort should be built to a specific standard by being well protected and having more firepower than militants (mortars, artillery, machine gun posts, etc). They have to be connected with other posts too. I can bet you that the outpost in question was weak and easy to attack, just like we've seen in all the other videos.
The green toyoya hiluxes in these areas need to be replaced with Humvee or better protected vehicles.
Nah bro this argument is not valid - please read this....i assure you posts like these are no where close to any village... only people you find in areas like these are militants or their facilitators who provide food, shelter and water to the runners
View attachment 811455
I agree. my point was against the scenario of US in AFG is different then Pak in so many ways. Also, my point is if checkposts are heavily protected and better armed then it will be even more effective then having surveillance drones. You can have drones but first things first.