What's new

Spreading LGBT To The Muslim World

What progress did the Communists bring? Who told you Communism is progress?

And if progress means less clothing then pigs and chimps are more progressive than you?

Why are you mullah types always ding-dong'ing between burqa and bikini ? For an actual idea about Communism please read my signature which depicts part of the goal that Communism desires.

It wasn't Zia, Afghan wants to live under the Shariah rule that is how their society functions , its their Democratic right to rule themselves under Shariah law :whistle:

Depends on what Sharia means. Please read this thread of mine from 2015 about how a Islamic wedding is really a socio-economic contract that can be broken if things go bad in the marriage. This is part of the real Sharia. This is against the traditional weddings in other religions where typically the wife has to be an ideal woman and tolerate an abusive marriage.

You want to turn the most conservative Muslim society, Afghans, into Atheist stalwarts, lol.

There is no reason a communist needs to be atheist. You will not find this sentiment even in my signature and that recent thread of mine about an new economic system.
 
Why are you mullah types always ding-dong'ing between burqa and bikini ? For an actual idea about Communism please read my signature which depicts part of the goal that Communism desires.
Aren't you the one always parading around that photo of Afghan women in short skirts as a symbol of "progress"?

Communism is a failure; it led to cannibalism and utter degeneration and humiliation of those nations who adopted this Godless ideology.

Liberalism is also a failure; destroying entire ecosystems and societies; complete and utter degeneration.

"Have you seen the one who takes as his god his own desire? Then would you be responsible for him?"(25:43). "Or do you think that most of them hear or reason? They are not except like livestock. Rather, they are [even] more astray in [their] way." (25:44)



Sorry, keep your filthy progress to yourself. I'd rather live like a "caveman" if that's what it means to be a practicing Muslim who only submits to his Creator and not to man-made ideologies :angel:
 
Last edited:
Sorry, keep your filthy progress to yourself. I'd rather live like a "caveman" if that's what it means to be a practicing Muslim who only submits to his Creator and not to man-made ideologies :angel:

Read this recent thread of mine about my idea of a new progressive economic system. You can leave your comments in that thread.
 
A few things;
We do not believe this to be normal.
It can never be tolerated by the deen, no one ever has and there is no allowance for it in Quran and Sunnah, it's actually outright condemnation.
We will not allow people to 'normalise' this in the minds of children, that includes the rest of the lettered groups i.e. LGBTQIA.
We will not discriminate, use violence against those who have such inclinations, rather we will talk to them or try to help them.
What they do privately is between them and Allah, they will be answerable.
Yes Gay people can be very nice folks, I've met lots.
 
Last edited:
A few things;
We do not believe this to be normal.
It can never be tolerated by the deen, no one ever has and there is no allowance for it in Quran and Sunnah, it's actually outright condemnation.
We will not allow people to 'normalise' this in the minds of children, that includes the rest of the lettered groups i.e. LGBTQIA.
We will not discriminate, use violence against those who have such inclinations, rather we will talk to them or try to help them.
What they do privately is between them and Allah, they will be answerable.
Yes Gay people can be very nice folks, I've met lots.
Being gay or lesbian is a mental disease. As with other diseases the question should not be permission or punishment, but to find and provide a cure.
 
Why are you mullah types always ding-dong'ing between burqa and bikini ? For an actual idea about Communism please read my signature which depicts part of the goal that Communism desires.

Lets try to stay away from labels, shall we?

What Communism aspires to be, and in what form we witnessed in Afghanistan are two totally different things. Can a genuine state like you mentioned even exist, I don't think so. Maybe small co-operatives, but never a nation state. The flaw of Communism is that after removal of the upper class and industrialists, the party leadership becomes the new movers of the society. Changing hats will not solve basic problems in the society.

Depends on what Sharia means. Please read this thread of mine from 2015 about how a Islamic wedding is really a socio-economic contract that can be broken if things go bad in the marriage. This is part of the real Sharia. This is against the traditional weddings in other religions where typically the wife has to be an ideal woman and tolerate an abusive marriage.

How can you remove the concept of faith, teachings of Islam, and ideal behaviors of both spouses from the Islamic marriage? For Muslims, marriage is such an important part of our faith and life, it cannot be relegated to merely a socio-economic contract. Allah swt is the third party in the marriage between two people, the marriage must be in accordance with the Islamic tradition.

There is no reason a communist needs to be atheist. You will not find this sentiment even in my signature and that recent thread of mine about an new economic system.

Islam already has a governing system, which has been developed by taking into account the sunnah, fiqh, and ijma'. Why do we need to adopt an alien system to our religious society?

We saw what the Russians did in Afghanistan, I think Pakistan and Afghanistan are the most immune to the type of change which you would like to bring.

India is much more receptive to Communism as Nehru was always moving in this direction. Plus a major part of Indians are irreligious, which take religion as just cultural markers, thus they swing Socialist anyway.
 
Being gay or lesbian is a mental disease. As with other diseases the question should not be permission or punishment, but to find and provide a cure.

Interesting point. However doesn't, in Islam, God punish these people? Would he punish them if they had no choice in their actions?
 
Interesting point. However doesn't, in Islam, God punish these people? Would he punish them if they had no choice in their actions?
Let me tell you an example: God forbid if you contact a deadly disease say Covid-19. Now you have 2 options, either you follow the guidelines such as avoid contact, maintain social distancing and seek treatment or you can feel proud that you have Covid and start spreading this disease by meeting with people and sneezing on their faces. Now tell me what will the society and govt will do to you in the 2nd case.

In above example, it was not your fault that you contacted this disease. Similarly it is not anyone's fault that he/she developed sexual affection for same gender. Punishment is for those who fulfill those desires and don't seek treatment.

There is nothing like no choice. Everyone has a choice unless he/she is completely insane. If someone can distinguish between good and rotten food, then for sure he has a choice in other matters as well.
 
Depends on what Shariah means. Please read this thread of mine from 2015 about how a Islamic wedding is really a socio-economic contract that can be broken if things go bad in the marriage. This is against the traditional weddings in other weddings where typically the wife has to tolerate an abusive marriage. This is the real Shariah, not another system of prayer.

Afghans have all the right rule themselves with their own version of Shariah .. Just like everyone else does what wrong ?
 
Aren't you the one always parading around that photo of Afghan women in short skirts as a symbol of "progress"?

Communism is a failure; it led to cannibalism and utter degeneration and humiliation of those nations who adopted this Godless ideology.

Liberalism is also a failure; destroying entire ecosystems and societies; complete and utter degeneration.

"Have you seen the one who takes as his god his own desire? Then would you be responsible for him?"(25:43). "Or do you think that most of them hear or reason? They are not except like livestock. Rather, they are [even] more astray in [their] way." (25:44)



Sorry, keep your filthy progress to yourself. I'd rather live like a "caveman" if that's what it means to be a practicing Muslim who only submits to his Creator and not to man-made ideologies :angel:

B-b-b-b-b-b-but muh communismsmsmszzzzz! :P

Nice to see you around buddy. Hope all is going well.
 
Aren't you the one always parading around that photo of Afghan women in short skirts as a symbol of "progress"?
Additionally, the Soviets killed off a million Afghans in that process of introducing short skirts. Three million were forced to flee their homes. Communists employed scorched earth tactics with no regard for human life (unsurprisingly).

Killing their own puppet presidents(along with their entire families) inside presidential palace because they were too slow to shove that progress down the throats of their people. Replacing them with more radical ones.

They call themselves progressive but the type of progress that they brought in Central Asian Khanates of Bukhara, Kokand and Khiva is also infront of everyone to see. They brought about the world's worst ecological disaster in the Transoxania region. Their legacy of turning people into machines, brutal suppression of political opposition and economic blunders can be experienced by anyone who travels in those republics.

Another thing to note is that Afghanistan is a resource rich country. Huge deposits of Lithium, iron ore etc. No wonder it got invaded twice within a short span of time (now Chinese firms have most mining contracts).
 
They already erected Ranjit Singh Kana's statue in Lahore. He was the person who had used Badshahi mosque as a stable and was hanging people in front of Wazir Khan mosque. Muslim leader Syed Ahmad Shaheed fought against Sikh rule and sacrificed his life in the process. Shamelessly, a sitting minister boasted about "Punjabi supremacy" when he announced his plans to build Ranjit Singh's statue.
Syad Ahmad Barelvi rose in prominence because of Pashtuns. Once he became powerful he then made the mistake of trying to force Pashtuns to marry their daughters and sisters to his needy Hindustani followers which they refused to do, that was the reason for his downfall. As for Ranjit Singh using Badshahi mosque as a horse stable, that is a myth
 
Islam already has a governing system, which has been developed by taking into account the sunnah, fiqh, and ijma'. Why do we need to adopt an alien system to our religious society?

The mot-clé here is "alien", that should be enough to close the debate for non-reformists. The problem between us and communists boils down to our adherence to different sets of moralities, which is more serious than a simple disagreement in fiqh which we have between us ergo Conservative Islam and communism are two ideas which are bound to be in incessant conflict
 

Back
Top Bottom