What's new

Raw Going to Give Small Nuclear Weapons to Terrorists and Blame it on Pakistan.

CIA , Mossad , RAW and MI5 are the real Axis of Evil and can go to any extent to fulfil their satanic agenda in this world !
Our military intelligence need to collaborate with Chinese Intelligence and their military and make a joint Security Pact ! I am sure that together with our Chinese friends help we can counter this evil threatl !
 
Ofcourse it was a reference to terrorism not against state.

If it was state he would use the name of the country.

Hostility from state and attack from terrorist groups are differentiated and are 2 things according to India.

Just because he said it after the former mentioned point after talking about Pakistan doesnt necessarily mean he related Pakistan to terrorism.

Or should he have waited another 2 minutes before saying the later words?
If this terrorism is inside the state, then using terrorism to counter this terrorism means doing terrorism inside the state. And even if we are to give him the benefit of semantics, he admits to using terrorism. It doesn't matter if you're using terrorism against terrorism, terrorism by definition is the targeting of civilians to create fear. Otherwise the whole idea of using ''terrorism to fight terrorism'' is bull. If you're going to selectively target 'terrorists', you might as well just call it ''fighting'' or ''warfare''.

But since he didn't say ''fighting'' and instead used the specific term ''terrorism'', that means the killing of innocents with the hope that a few terrorists will be caught in the middle - which is pretty much what the Taliban do.
 
I am pretty sure RAW will try its very best to harm Pak China & Pak Afghan relationship. The recent statements from India proves that they are desperate & unhappy with Pak China & Pak Afghan relationship. ISI & IB will have to work really hard to make sure Indian evil intentions are crushed.
 
First we have to assess the threat, if they really have small nuclear devices? or are they available in the black market, as ISIS boosted in their propaganda magazine that they will soon get nuclear weapons from Pakistan. We dont want to chase a ghost.. to me India is more like a bully most of the time, however a fanatic being on top is a dangerous combination.. how far will they be going, and will Pakistan take a stand in UN against them, I am sure tension will rise, as India will act like a jealous woman, who couldnt get married to a boy of her choice, so they will hit us. there is no doubt about it, and their intentions are clear.

Have our State institutions doing their job, I see KP Police getting ready to play a powerful role along with the Military to normalize the region under them and that is a big service to the future Pakistan.

I remember back n 90s, when India would blow up a train in Pakistan, We too would do the same, and that would keep India quiet for week or months.. now we have to get our stance across we must not do the same, we must take a stance in International forums wth help of China, we would surely hit India that way where it hurts her the most or will keep her at bay !


No matter how much you cry innocent. If any nuclear leak happen in USA, and if Nuclear-fingerprint track back to Pakistan. We all know what USA will do with Pakistan...

Or Even USA find that Pakistani are involved (so called non state actors) then also we know what USA will do with Paksitan.
 
Your defense minister said he endorses the use of terrorism against Pakistan, publicly. There are videos of that. Nothing photo shopped, and every third party lends credibility to those videos.

But, knowing Indians, I won't be surprised if you people start saying that the videos are all ''photoshopped'' and that your defense minister never said any of those things since he's an angel.

He said that alright, I am glad he did. Could you do me a favor ? Take that clip, and the biggest speakers that you can find in Your country, play it loud over the graves of Gen Zia, Bhutto and his daughter so that they may hear it. He is just paying the debt back in kind.

He specifically mentioned Pakistan, then he said ''or any other country'', after which he said they'll use terrorism against terrorists. Meaning that he essentially substituted the word terrorism for Pakistan/China/ any country India doesn't like.

He obviously didn't mean to say ''lets use terrorists against TTP or ISIS''. We all know what the Indian narrative is and we all know what he really meant. So what's with this semantics argument? This is an internet forum for open discussion and we're not politicians; we shouldn't have to mince words and hide behind semantics.

There is no admission about anything from my side. All there is is a near-explicit admission of Indian proxy warfare against what India labels as terrorists (i.e Pakistan).

If you are not terrorists no need to be wetting your pants. no politicians. So you accept That Pakistan is Terrorist. if you are not no need to be riled up.

Still about Headley, Rana, Lakhvi, Hafiz Saeed, and strategic assets of Pak Army. who are they sufi saints? singing "Bullah ki jana mai kaun ?" not apologetic. Its just chicken coming home to roost. also did you forget Hillary clinton's statement of snakes in back yard?, kill snakes with snakes. simple.
 
Whatever RAW is capable of, ISI can do it too. Therefore, status quo will be achieved after one or two miscalculations by the Modi administration. Let's just hope that the miscalculations are not blunders of gigantic proportions, cause that would fry everyone in the subcontinent.
 
Whatever RAW is capable of, ISI can do it too. Therefore, status quo will be achieved after one or two miscalculations by the Modi administration. Let's just hope that the miscalculations are not blunders of gigantic proportions, cause that would fry everyone in the subcontinent.

As ISI's illustrious history will tell you, that's hardly true. The history of ISI (and PA) has been a mix of desultory tactical brilliance mixed in with staggering strategic blunders. The only front where it has been able to present itself competently, and admirably at that, is maintaining a semblance of control over the infinite number of militias and mujaheddin outfits.

In every strategic confrontation save for the Afgan front of the 1980s, ISI (and PA to which it reports) have suffered crushing defeats. Case in point would be the Khalistan movement and the Kashmir Jihad.

In short, the assumption that ISI and RAW are roughly equal in capabilities, is dubious at best, and outright scandalous at worst. And I'm not even comparing the technical intelligence capabilities of the two. Managing a few militia is not the same as being a competent intelligence organisation.
 
This is good, Pakistan needs to be pre-emptive with Indian false flagging attempts.

Should have done the same before Mumbai drama but they were naiive back then.
 
If you are not terrorists no need to be wetting your pants.
We are not terrorists. But using terrorism means killing civilians. So you are going to kill civilians in places where you think there are terrorists. There is all the need to be worried when ''the world's biggest democracy'' openly makes it their policy to use terrorism.
Still about Headley, Rana, Lakhvi, Hafiz Saeed, and strategic assets of Pak Army. who are they sufi saints? singing "Bullah ki jana mai kaun ?"
You think they are 'strategic assets'. Maybe they really are sufis who sing ''bullah ki jana mai kaun''. I don't know them personally, I don't know what they sing.
Its just chicken coming home to roost.
If this is Pakistan's chickens coming home to roost, you should fear the day India's chickens come home to roost.
 
Raw Going to Give Small Nuclear Weapons to Terrorists and Blame it on Pakistan.

@Norwegian , @syedali73 , , @Leader , @DESERT FIGHTER , @Horus @Jazzbot @Norwegian @pkuser2k12 @Fahad Khan 2 @Spring Onion @chauvunist @Pukhtoon @Jzaib
@Horus @Devil Soul @rockstar08 @WAJsal @Junaid B @Color_Less_Sky @Zarvan @xyxmt @Spy Master @SipahSalar @Bratva @Stealth @Rashid Mahmood
@A.Rafay @Ahmad1996 @Akheilos @Armstrong @arushbhai @AstanoshKhan @AZADPAKISTAN2009 @balixd @batmannow @Bilal. @chauvunist @Crypto @Dr. Stranglove @Evil Flare @EyanKhan @Fahad Khan 2 @GIANTsasquatch @graphican @Green Arrow @Guleen Ahmed @HRK @Jazzbot @Junaid B @Jzaib @Khalidr @khawaja07 @Leader @Luftwaffe @mr42O @Muhammad Omar @nomi007 @Pak123 @Pakistani shaheens @Pakistanisage @Peaceful Civilian @pkuser2k12 @Pukhtoon @PWFI @raazh @Rafael @Rashid Mahmood @RescueRanger @Saifkhan12 @SHAMK9 @Spy Master @Stealth @Strike X @SUPARCO @sur @syedali73 @Tameem @Tayyab1796 @Zarvan @waleed3601 @AdeelFaheem @Rajput_Pakistani @Men in Green @IceCold @LoveIcon @razahassan1997 @Dil Pakistan @asq @junaid hamza @Pukhtoon @jamahir @Strigon @Rafi @Ulla @HughSlaman @420canada @sathya @slapshot @raza_888 @hacsan
@SBD-3 @cb4 @AsianUnion @Aether @Proudpakistaniguy @Waffen SS @FaujHistorian @Fracker @Ranches @ghoul @Jf Thunder @GreenFalcon @genmirajborgza786 @orangzaib @Pakistani Exile @KURUMAYA @Irfan Baloch @ali_raza @Syed.Ali.Haider @dexter @Patriots @muslim_pakistani @W.11 @Meengla @zaid butt @ajpirzada @Shoaib Rathore @OrionHunter @CHARGER @Major Sam @yesboss @TheNoob @Bratva @ghazaliy2k @Viny @StormShadow @suresh1773 @SOHEIL @venu309 @danish_vij @Force-India @faisal6309 @S.U.R.B. @vsdave2302 @jarves @WAJsal @pursuit of happiness @Winchester @janon @pak-marine @AgNoStiC MuSliM
@Etilla @SpArK @Srinivas @desert warrior @DRAY @pumkinduke @wolfpack @pursuit of happiness @danish_vij @rubyjackass @Star Wars @Ammyy @bloo @Marxist @karan.1970 @Not Sure @Avik274 @SamantK @Major Shaitan Singh @Omega007 @farhan_9909 @haviZsultan @Sidak @ranjeet @Yogijaat @ravi Nair @WAR-rior @halupridol @he-man @Indrani @Mike_Brando @SarthakGanguly @sreekumar @OrionHunter @lightoftruth @Water Car Engineer @indiatester @Ind4Ever @13 komaun @anant_s @itachiii @SwAggeR @Brahmos_2 @Blue_Eyes @bhangi bava @SAMEET @naveen mishra @Bagha @utraash @Chanakya's_Chant @Krate M @gslv mk3 @r1_vns @blood @noksss @PARIKRAMA @thesolar65 @Rohit Patel @wolfschanzze @levina @vostok @rahi2357
What "Faisal Muhammad international Mediator" saying yes it could be possible an US defense expert also confirmed International Mediator's comments.

What "Faisal Muhammad international Mediator" saying yes it could be possible an US defense expert also confirmed International Mediator's comments.
 
ISIS boasts it 'could buy first nuclear weapon in less than 12 months' - Mirror Online
Isis claims it could buy its first nuclear weapon from Pakistan within a year - Middle East - World - The Independent
pakistan army and media is trying their best to spread their propaganda. isis said they will get nukes form pakistan, so to save face of pakistan military the pak media is trying to blame india for Pakistan's failures.

The U.S. State department documents made public shows that India was supporting Osama. Truth is revealed at the end. Even this ISIS drama will show some Indian nexus.
 

Back
Top Bottom