What's new

Raw Going to Give Small Nuclear Weapons to Terrorists and Blame it on Pakistan.

Now I see why blame RAW for everything.
The same reason you blame ISI for everything. Only we have the added evidence of your defense minister admitting India supports terrorism.

Keep up with the Anjem Choudary Sermons, it doing you mighty good.
Funny, I've been opposing Anjem Chaudhry ever since I can remember. Does that count as sermons too? I know it is doing me mighty good.

this report is from think-tank. not from CIA or US military. they never says anything correctly, even US military will never consider them seriously.
So the internationally recognized think-tank is wrong but the words of an Israeli journalist from ''the Atlantic'' are gospel?
the reason they says for india's poor performance in security is:
"meanwhile, the official mentioned a number of factors, such as weak regulations, increasing quantities of weapons-usable nuclear materials for civilian and military use, gaps in its regulatory structure, behind India’s poor show"
Weak regulations, increasing quantities and gaps in the regulatory structure means that they at risk. It's simple logic. Does everything need to be spelled out?
 
Reason to copy you was NOT to get your blanket and unqualified support for our agencies. Although every single Indian does that like a religious duty for his agencies.

It was more of an FYI for you and PTI re our current situation in the country and the recent surge in the terrorism since the announcement of Pak-China economic corridor and the Supreme court decision to suspend all death penalties recommended by military courts.

I would rather like a constructive and fair criticism of our state institutions & “establishment (Khakis of Pindi & Aabpara) than a malicious hate campaign (by Najam Shethi, Kamran Shafi, Hamid Mir etc) or blind and misplaced patriotism.

India is a democracy and its very well established. No doubt about that but there is a surge in extremism and its justification among the internet Hindus (a term coined by a fellow Indian herself). And the current government seems to portray the kind of emotive volatile attitude of the Indian netizens.


This is something which we must NOT do or follow but we need to be cognizant when we discuss about terrorism inside Pakistan.

First we have to assess the threat, if they really have small nuclear devices? or are they available in the black market, as ISIS boosted in their propaganda magazine that they will soon get nuclear weapons from Pakistan. We dont want to chase a ghost.. to me India is more like a bully most of the time, however a fanatic being on top is a dangerous combination.. how far will they be going, and will Pakistan take a stand in UN against them, I am sure tension will rise, as India will act like a jealous woman, who couldnt get married to a boy of her choice, so they will hit us. there is no doubt about it, and their intentions are clear.

Have our State institutions doing their job, I see KP Police getting ready to play a powerful role along with the Military to normalize the region under them and that is a big service to the future Pakistan.

I remember back n 90s, when India would blow up a train in Pakistan, We too would do the same, and that would keep India quiet for week or months.. now we have to get our stance across we must not do the same, we must take a stance in International forums wth help of China, we would surely hit India that way where it hurts her the most or will keep her at bay !
 
First we have to assess the threat, if they really have small nuclear devices? or are they available in the black market, as ISIS boosted in their propaganda magazine that they will soon get nuclear weapons from Pakistan. We dont want to chase a ghost.. to me India is more like a bully most of the time, however a fanatic being on top is a dangerous combination.. how far will they be going, and will Pakistan take a stand in UN against them, I am sure tension will rise, as India will act like a jealous woman, who couldnt get married to a boy of her choice, so they will hit us. there is no doubt about it, and their intentions are clear.

Have our State institutions doing their job, I see KP Police getting ready to play a powerful role along with the Military to normalize the region under them and that is a big service to the future Pakistan.

I remember back n 90s, when India would blow up a train in Pakistan, We too would do the same, and that would keep India quiet for week or months.. now we have to get our stance across we must not do the same, we must take a stance in International forums wth help of China, we would surely hit India that way where it hurts her the most or will keep her at bay !
I don't know where you all get Fantasy stories

A) you already sold nukes weapons design to Libya and NK . and every country has proof of that.

B) now i understand why PAK people are technically backward , If you didn't know the physics, let me tell you once thing in Laymans language. In case of explosion World powers/ labs can detect and came to know where Uranium / Plutonium came from, their geographic locations etc. Thanks to Physics , Every Indian knows , but can't say most of the educated (uneducated ) people like you.
 
I don't know where you all get Fantasy stories

A) you already sold nukes weapons design to Libya and NK . and every country has proof of that.

B) now i understand why PAK people are technically backward , If you didn't know the physics, let me tell you once thing in Laymans language. In case of explosion World powers/ labs can detect and came to know where Uranium / Plutonium came from, their geographic locations etc. Thanks to Physics , Every Indian knows , but can't say most of the educated (uneducated ) people like you.

lol..
 
Mr full member , if ISI had given to IS then Iran and Israel would be the first target. ISI cannot dictate terms to ISIS. Taliban? are you even serious?? We are butchering them near Af-Pak border

You are talking to a clown high on Hindutva ideology, same shit as Taliban ideology. They just can't think straight and always talk out of their asses.
 
The same reason you blame ISI for everything. Only we have the added evidence of your defense minister admitting India supports terrorism.

Same as your dictator vouching for the 1000 cuts idea, now we have defence minister who thinks, its about time the debt was paid in kind, finally someone with balls. No innocent sides in this battle, hope all the "Strategic Assets" of Gen. Sharif are well fed and kept.

Evidence that not one third party lends an iota of credibility? Lol, those Photoshopped document uploads on this forum you mean, they have been mighty helpful. Evidence like David Coleman Headley, Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, and Tahawwur Hussain Rana. Yes we also got that Kasab fellow, Lots of evidence.

Funny, I've been opposing Anjem Chaudhry ever since I can remember. Does that count as sermons too? I know it is doing me mighty good.

Well that's cute of you.
 
It's like someone in Pakistan thinks of everything that could possibly go wrong and then blames R&AW in advance. So that, when and if it does happen, they can say I told you so!
well they told you.
 
he is much better than your noora who is leading your country.


And the same PM was given a red carpet. So come to reality...Your mulla brigade days are numbered including their sympathizers.
You are yet another brain farter cartoon like your mentally retarted master Ajit Doval infact duffer.
 
Evidence that not one third party lends an iota of credibility?
Lol, those Photoshopped document uploads on this forum you mean, they have been mighty helpful.
No, ''lol'', learn to read.
Only we have the added evidence of your defense minister admitting India supports terrorism.
Your defense minister said he endorses the use of terrorism against Pakistan, publicly. There are videos of that. Nothing photo shopped, and every third party lends credibility to those videos.

But, knowing Indians, I won't be surprised if you people start saying that the videos are all ''photoshopped'' and that your defense minister never said any of those things since he's an angel.
 
No, ''lol'', learn to read.

Your defense minister said he endorses the use of terrorism against Pakistan, publicly. There are videos of that. Nothing photo shopped, and every third party lends credibility to those videos.

But, knowing Indians, I won't be surprised if you people start saying that the videos are all ''photoshopped'' and that your defense minister never said any of those things since he's an angel.


He clearly said the use of terrorism/terrorist against terrorists, but your admission relating terrorism/.terrorist as your own country is shocking and astonishing.

Nothing more to say.
 
He clearly said the use of terrorism/terrorist against terrorists, but your admission relating terrorism/.terrorist as your own country is shocking and astonishing.

Nothing more to say.
He specifically mentioned Pakistan, then he said ''or any other country'', after which he said they'll use terrorism against terrorists. Meaning that he essentially substituted the word terrorism for Pakistan/China/ any country India doesn't like.

He obviously didn't mean to say ''lets use terrorists against TTP or ISIS''. We all know what the Indian narrative is and we all know what he really meant. So what's with this semantics argument? This is an internet forum for open discussion and we're not politicians; we shouldn't have to mince words and hide behind semantics.

There is no admission about anything from my side. All there is is a near-explicit admission of Indian proxy warfare against what India labels as terrorists (i.e Pakistan).
 
He specifically mentioned Pakistan, then he said ''or any other country'', after which he said they'll use terrorism against terrorists. Meaning that he essentially substituted the word terrorism for Pakistan/China/ any country India doesn't like.

He obviously didn't mean to say ''lets use terrorists against TTP or ISIS''. We all know what the Indian narrative is and we all know what he really meant. So what's with this semantics argument? This is an internet forum for open discussion and we're not politicians; we shouldn't have to mince words and hide behind semantics.

There is no admission about anything from my side. All there is is a near-explicit admission of Indian proxy warfare against what India labels as terrorists (i.e Pakistan).


Ofcourse it was a reference to terrorism not against state.

If it was state he would use the name of the country.

Hostility from state and attack from terrorist groups are differentiated and are 2 things according to India.

Just because he said it after the former mentioned point after talking about Pakistan doesnt necessarily mean he related Pakistan to terrorism.

Or should he have waited another 2 minutes before saying the later words?
 

Back
Top Bottom