The intolerance Zaid Hamid preaches as producing results as you have acccused me on being on a vendetta spree against ZH.
Since when criticizing govn't policies and stooges of the West and CIA have become synonymous with "spreading intolerance"?
Critiquing the nefarious Govn't of Zardari and calling them puppets of the west, along with other corrupt agents such as teh gang of MQM has become "hatred" now??
I abhor his ideologies, his methods, his fact twisting, religio-political manipulation, emotional enticement and the fake "glorious destiny" that he preaches.
I have come to understand that you have a personal issue with his personality. A personal vendetta. Nothing more than that.
When Indians hate zaid hamid it's justifiable. But your hate is borderline shady and without a doubt its just personal vendetta.
Shoot the message, not the messenger.
By telling everybody that whoever is not on "the right side of history" would be destroyed, by calling every critic "antipakistan" and "traitor" and by labeling every sane person a "defeatist", he has inculcated even more hatred in the minds of an already deploy divided and intolerant population.
Now you have reduced the entire 170 million Pakistanis as intolerant and divided and unintelligent. What a ridiculous assertion. It appears that you have gone out of your mind to make such an absurd claim that has nothing to do with reality. If that were the case Pak wouldn't have been in existence.
Calling a spade, a spade, nothing wrong with it. Do you suppose that Pakistan should treat the traitors with flowers and candles?
How else do you propose Pakistanis should refer to traitors and bigot political/religious figures as?
He must be countered on all levels and the religious bigots have used their weapon of choice i.e. religion and they have published scathing reviews of his past, his lies and distortions and have came up with rebuttals. I have posted them here because everybody here does not know about the maulvi run blog and has the right to information. So here goes another one, one of Pakistan's leading (and controversial) schools of Islam, has published a not so friendly opinion about Hazrat Zaid Zaman Hamid :-
Here you're trying so hard to point to fawmustered up by some shotty Maulvi's, who are even according to your own account "controversial". You feel so convenient to use statements of these controversial Maulvi's at your disposal when they favour you, who are in fact suspect in your worldview. Double standards, perhaps?
Explain to me why should I take your fatwas seriously which offer no link to evidence whatsoever but attempts to implicate Zaid Hamid in murder charges through slurs and condemnations??