What's new

Yunus 'siphoned Tk 7bn aid for poor'

BNP sees plot against Yunus


Thu, Dec 9th, 2010 10:45 pm BdST
Dial 2000 from your GP mobile for latest news
Habiganj, Dec 9 (bdnews24.com)—In its first public reaction on the allegations that Grameen Bank founder Muhammad Yunus diverted funds worth billions of taka, opposition BNP says 'a conspiracy' is being plotted against him.

"Nobel laureate Yunus have brought worldwide recognition to the country, yet a section is up against him and making false propaganda," claimed joint secretary general Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir.

"The Norwegian government itself has said that no funds have been embezzled by Dr Yunus," Alamgir said at a meeting organised by the party's peasants wing Jatiyatabadi Krishak Dal on Thursday.

Alamgir alleged that the country was once again heading towards one-party rule and democracy was at risk.

He alleged that factories were shutting down and non-resident Bangladeshis were being sent back every day. And as things were looking bleak, a 'certain nation' was on a mission to turn Bangladesh into its domestic market, taking advantage of the government's subservient policy.

"India will be allowed to use our land and enjoy transit facility. And what will we get?" Alamgir asked.

bdnews24.com/corr/msb/rn/shk/bd/2136h
 
SPECIAL'Norad refund wasn't in full' | Bangladesh | bdnews24.com

SPECIAL
'Norad refund wasn't in full'
Fri, Dec 10th, 2010 3:32 pm

Dhaka, Dec 10 (bdnews24.com)—Grameen Bank did not refund all the money to Norad, says Tom Heinemann, the maker of the documentary 'Caught in Micro Debt', aired on the Norwegian television NRK.

Heinemann's reaction on Wednesday follows Tuesday's statement from the foreign ministry of Norway on the Bank's founder Muhammad Yunus' fund transfer to Grameen Kalyan from Grameen Bank, breaching the agreement.

In an e-mail to bdnews24.com, Heinemann said, "The Embassy and Norad reacted strongly [at] the time that the money was transferred in part to save tax. Grameen Bank is still using the tax argument when they are defending the transaction."

At a talk show on a private TV channel on Tuesday, Grameen's general manager M Shahjahan said that they had transferred the fund to 'save tax', but not to 'evade tax'.

On Nov 30, the Norwegian state television ran the documentary 'Caught in Micro Debt' by Danish journalist Tom Heinemann. The documentary brought the transfer issue to public as 12 years into the incident.

bdnews24.com was the first to break the story in Bangladesh, which stirred a raging debate across the world.

'NOT A WORD ON CORRUPTION'

Norway's foreign ministry then asked Norad to submit a report on fund transfer which the aid agency did on Tuesday.

Norad in the report said it found no evidence of embezzlement of the Norwegian funds given to Grameen Bank but that the bank did transfer the aid money to its sister company, breaching the agreement.

Norway's environment and international development minister Erik Solheim said, "The matter was concluded when the agreement concerning reimbursement of the funds was entered into in May 1998 under the government in office at the time."

Norad's report shows that Grameen Bank transferred a total of Norwegian kroner (NOK) 608.5 million to Grameen Kalyan in 1996. Norway's share of this amount is estimated to be approximately NOK 170 million.

But Heinemann says, according to the 'confidential memos', the amount transferred is actually NOK 274 million.

"The documentary: "Fanget i Mikrogjeld" have never claimed (or said) one word about misuse of money, nor have the programme raised any allegations regarding potential corruption issues," said Heinemann.

"But why should the documents be kept away from the public?"

"Why did the then Director of Norad, Mrs. Tove Strand Gerhardsen and Mr. Yunus agree in keeping these documents stamped 'Confidential' and hidden away from the politicians in both countries? These questions are still unanswered," he added.

'100 MILLION UNACCOUNTED FOR'

The Danish journalist said the embassy and Norad agreed to a compromise of 170 million. "It meant that not all of the Norwegian funds were returned to the Grameen Bank."

"More than 100 million is not accounted for. We have seen no evidence to show that Grameen Kalyan has returned the rest of the aid funds provided by other countries / institutions, as [Grameen Bank] claim in their statement."

In a May 26, 1998 letter, the Norwegian embassy in Dhaka told Dr Yunus, "The embassy is glad to confirm the compromise which has been reached concerning transfer of funds provided from Norway to Grameen Bank."

It also stated the amount of refund that Norway provided to Grameen Bank during different phases.

Fund that should be returned are "NOK 76 million, provided for housing loan under an agreement of 1994 (phase-4); NOK 30 million, provided for housing loan under another an agreement of 1993 (phase-4); NOK 40 million, provided for housing loan under an agreement of 1990 (phase-3) and NOK 24 million, provided for general and collective loan under an agreement of 1990 (phase-3)."

'WHAT ABOUT OTHER DONORS' MONEY?'

Heinemann says, "It is documented that of the 608 million—the total fund transferred to Grameen Kalyan—540 million was from Norad and other donors such as Germany, Sweden and The Netherlands."

Quoting that the Swedish aid agency SIDA had provided him evidence that Sweden gave 190 million Swedish kronor, Heinemann says the money "was transferred from the Grameen Bank to Grameen Kalyan".

"But they concluded that they would not join Norway's demand for repatriation of funds because they would not damage the Grameen Bank's good name and reputation," he added.

On Grameen Kalyan's purposes as a company, Heinemann notes that it has a completely different purpose than the Grameen Bank "among other things, to create joint ventures with multinational companies, invest in other companies, invest capital in shares, etc."

'WHO SHOULD WE BELIEVE?'

Heinemann mentions that to date they have not seen any proof or accounts that in any way gives any evidence on what the transferred money in Grameen Kalyan actually was used for.

He says, "Mr. (Erik) Solheim, the minister for international development in Norway, has said in the Norwegian parliament that the transferred money e.g. was used for the flood victims in 1998."

"In the Grameen Bank statement it's not mentioned by a single word. Who should we believe?"

GRAMEEN REACTS

In an email to bdnews24.com at 12:56am on Friday, Grameen Bank asserted that Norad money was fully refunded to Grameen Bank by Grameen Kalyan.

"As stated by NORAD, all provided funds have been accounted for and returned. The matter is considered closed by the Norwegian government. All other funds from the remaining donor organizations have been equally returned."

The rejoinder signed by M Shajhahan, the general manager, said, "Grameen Kalyan is a not for profit organisation created by the Grameen Bank Board of Directors for the purpose of administering welfare programs to Grameen Bank borrowers and employees."

Its services include healthcare services, educational support and scholarships for the children of borrowers, the Bank added.
It further added that none of the donor funds have been used to finance Grameen Kalyan initiatives.

"However, the donor funds generated interest income that Grameen Kalyan then invested into Grameen Kalyan projects."
 
Muhammad Yunus side of the story:

orrespondent
Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus yesterday re-emphasised that there was no wrongdoing in the fund transfer from Grameen Bank to Grameen Kalyan.

The Grameen Bank founder described the disagreement with Norad, the Norwegian aid ministry, as honest disagreement and said it was a difference of opinion on "modality".

"Other donor agencies did not raise any question on the modality, but Norad did. Later, we had resolved it," said Prof Yunus.

Yunus said he is saddened to see how much of the local media dealt with the issue, and falsely suggested a diversion of funds for purposes unintended by the donors. He, however, wanted to put the controversy behind him and work unitedly for eliminating poverty in Bangladesh.

The Nobel laureate made the comments at a press conference at Grameen Bank headquarters in Mirpur yesterday. He addressed the media to resolve the debate that caused mental agony not only to him but also to many people in the country.

Prof Yunus said some local media published an inaccurate and misleading news report regarding an alleged "siphoning off" of a large amount of money by him through one of his organisations. The aid had been agreed, in 1994, between Grameen Bank and Norad to be used for housing loans for the poor in Bangladesh.

Reports in the local media were triggered following a documentary "Fanget I Mikrogjeld" (caught in micro debt) shown on Norwegian TV on November 30.

Yunus, however, ruled out any legal action against such libellous news reports that he was "siphoning off" Tk 7 billion.

He also saw no conspiracy against him, though he said some individuals might have added fuel to the controversy.

The microcredit pioneer read out a two-page statement explaining the issue of fund transfer that triggered the debate. He explained the job benefits he receives from Grameen Bank and his dream of sending poverty into the museums. Later, he answered questions of reporters on a wide range of issues including tax exemption, microcredit, public relations, corporate governance, GrameenPhone and social business.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway on the fund transfer
Prof Yunus showed how a latest Norad report on its assistance to Grameen Bank on December 7 cleared Grameen Bank from all allegations of wrongdoing. The report was published following a request from Erik Solheim, the minister for environment and international development.

"According to the report, there is no indication that Norwegian funds have been used for unintended purposes, or that Grameen Bank has engaged in corrupt practices or embezzled funds. The matter was concluded when the agreement concerning reimbursement of the funds was entered into in May 1998 under the government in office at the time," said Solheim.

His role at Grameen Bank and in its sister concerns
Prof Yunus said he does not receive any monetary benefits, house, car or any allowance from any organisations other than Grameen Bank. He gets salaries and other benefits from Grameen Bank as its official. He has no share in Grameen Bank or any of its various organisations. Though he sits on Grameen Bank and other boards, he has no voting power.

Tax exemption
Grameen Bank gets tax exemption from the government. Grameen has applied to extend the facility on the eve of its expiry. Prof Yunus replied to a query that he has sought tax exemption for Grameen Bank because it benefits the poor. "It's my moral responsibility to demand tax exemption," he said. "If tax is imposed on Grameen then do it for other NGOs," he said, adding that other NGOs (microlenders) get tax exemptions.

Microcredit
Muhammad Yunus defended microcredit as an effective tool in cutting down poverty but criticised the abuse of it.

He criticised over-commercialisation of microcredit by SKS, India's largest for-profit micro financier.

"But it doesn't mean the original concept of microcredit is flawed." Microcredit is meant to help the poor with loans, he added.

The comment came after his attention was drawn to SKS that staged a highly successful initial share offer in India in August.

It came at a time when analysts fear India's seven-billion-dollar micro-finance industry could be thrown into crisis by a bill that seeks to regulate lending to the poor more tightly.

The legislation, slated to be taken up Tuesday by lawmakers in southern Andhra Pradesh state--hub of India's microcredit activities, sets new rules aimed at cracking down on aggressive lending and recovery practices.

Yunus explained the microcredit operations of Grameen Bank. Its interest rate is 20 percent, which is lower than the government rate at 27 percent.

Grameen Bank offers four types of interest rates for borrowers: 20 percent for income generating loans, 8 percent for housing loans, 5 percent for student loans and zero percent for beggars.

In its publications, Grameen explains: "All interests are simple interest, calculated on declining balance method."

This means, if a borrower takes an income-generating loan of Tk 1,000 and pays back the entire amount in weekly instalments within a year, she will pay a total of Tk 1,100 (Tk 1,000 as principal and Tk 100 as interest for the year, which is equivalent to a 10 percent flat rate).

Grameen declared 30 percent cash dividend for 2009, which the micro-lender said was the highest cash dividend declared by any bank in Bangladesh for the year.

The highest record of dividends declared by Grameen was in 2006: it was 100 percent.

Yunus defended his oft-repeated vision of sending poverty to museums, a target that many think is far from achievable.

"Let's set a target to erase poverty from Bangladesh by 2030. This is my dream."

"If there is a target to halve poverty in 15 years by 2015 in line with the millennium development goals, then it is my dream of eradicating poverty in another 15 years."

On Prime Minister's comments
Yunus declined to comment on prime minister's remarks about him. But he said whatever she said was her view.

On political ambition
Prof Yunus said he has no plan to get involved in politics. "A wise man hardly repeats the same blunder," he said.

Prof Yunus tried to float a political party during the caretaker government rule in 2007.

On GrameenPhone
Norwegian company Telenor owns two-thirds of GrameenPhone's share. Prof Yunus after the Nobel peace prize demanded Telenor handover its shares to Grameen. As to whether he sticks to the demand, Yunus said, "We still pursue it, but we cannot legally enforce." He said Grameen has nothing but to request Telenor.

Public relations at Grameen
Replying to a query Prof Yunus admitted that Grameen had deficiency in public relations affairs. "Now a dedicated person has been appointed to deal with the issue," he said.

Media business
Yunus said media business should be social business, otherwise the space will be taken up by the owners' news. "I have got offer from India and the US to launch a TV (television) and a global networking media respectively," he said. But he did not say whether he is going to get involved in the media business.

Corporate governance in Grameen Bank
About establishing corporate governance in Grameen Bank, he said it depends on the board. He said the government nominates the chairman and two directors in the board who along with other directors can decide on it.

At the end, the Nobel laureate urged all to work together to build the country, which he believes has immense potential. "I want cooperation from all, and confrontation with none," he said.

According to him, poverty is still the number one problem in Bangladesh and only unity can address the issue meaningfully


No wrong done
 
Back
Top Bottom