What's new

Yun-9 (Y-9) Transport Aircraft

qwerrty

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 12, 2010
Messages
3,743
Reaction score
-12
Y-9
----
max TO weight 65t
max payload 20t or 106 paratroopers
15t payload range 2,200km
max range 5,000km
max level speed 650km/h
cruise speed 550km/h
service ceiling 10,100m
cruise altitude 8,000m
Chinese Military Aviation | China Air Force
-------

00y9multipurposetranspo.jpg

y93view.jpg

y9al.jpg

128507337875810.jpg

128507337830250.jpg

y9ca.jpg

y9cockpit.jpg
 
.
Does anyone know what the powerplant is on this baby?

also love the quilted covers for the propellers.
 
. . . .
piston engine? I don't see the cylinder heads but I don't see the intake for a turbofan either.

PW (Pratt & Whitney) engines were mean for y8-f600, dead project.

2006062205.jpg


y9
"The aircraft will be powered by 4 WJ-6C turboprops (rated @ 5,100ehp each) with JL-4 6-blade propellers made of composite materials, which improve its high temperature and high altitude performance."

*ttp://cnair.top81.cn/Il-76_Y-8X_H-6U.htm#Y-9
 
.
Enlighten me if I'm wrong but I thought turbofans were a type of jet engine.

It essentially is based on my limited knowledge about this.

Where a turbojet uses the rotation from produced by the thrust to draw in and compress air for combustion, a turbo prop produces a lot less thrust but a lot more torque.

Things like helicopter uses them, because of their low weight to power ratio. I think turbine engines on the M1 Abrams work on the same principal.



**oops my mistake I wrote turbofan when I meant to write turbo prop. You are right turbofan is a type of jet engine.
 
.
PW (Pratt & Whitney) engines were mean for y8-f600, dead project.

2006062205.jpg

Excellent, thank you.


another question. Where is the air-intake for the turbo prop? Similar turbo props on the C-130 have prominent intakes.

040907-F-0000S-003.jpg
 
. . .
20t or 106 paratrooper, so every paratrooper weights 188kg? Seriously? That would be some FAT paratroopers.
 
. .
20t or 106 paratrooper, so every paratrooper weights 188kg? Seriously? That would be some FAT paratroopers.

When it comes to carrying troops, I think room is usually more of a concern. The same goes for landing ships as well.
 
.
Lol yeah you are not just going to stack them on top of each other and dump them all out at the same time.

106 is just short of one battalion.
 
.
Lol yeah you are not just going to stack them on top of each other and dump them all out at the same time.

106 is just short of one battalion.

I don't know how battalions are structured in the PLA, but here even companies usually have 4 50 man platoons.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom