Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It appears that they're waiting for the WS-20 to be incorporated ... no wonder why the low productionThanks to the never ending efforts of "Honorable Wall Climbers" (四机同框,当了一回爬墙党)
4 Y-20 spotted, 6 being confirmed so far
6 already in service and surely a few more in pipeline ready to be delivered end of the year. I dont think if 8 Y-20 to be produced in a year is considered a slow production.It appears that they're waiting for the WS-20 to be incorporated ... no wonder why the low production
I thought they were still using that D-30KP-2 engines, not the WS-18 or WS-20. The fact that the current engines look identical to the Russian ones does not bode well. Right now, the Y-20 can only hold around 50 tonnes, but with the WS-20 it can do around the mid 60's. Remember, copying engines is just as arduous and difficult, why not just design a new engine entirely? More importantly, China has a limited stockpile of D30KP2s and probably doesn't want more ...6 already in service and surely a few more in pipeline ready to be delivered end of the year. I dont think if 8 Y-20 to be produced in a year is considered a slow production.
I predict we will not see the so called W20 install on Y-20 anytime sooner. The fat engine we saw tested on IL-76 testbed is not WS20 but CJ1000 engine to be used on C919.
China has no problem on Y-20 engine. They are using WS-18 which is an upgrade clone of D30KP2. China unlike US which needs to transport a 72 tons MBT. WS-18 thrust is enough to satisfy PLAAF global transport in the next 10 years since we do not forsee the need to transport a 72tons mbt around. PLA heaviest mbt is only 54tons. The requirement is different from USAF. The best is WS-18 is used on H-6k, a new bomber which is currenly mass produced for PLAAF and is part of PLAAF global strike due to its longe range plus the capacity to carry many stand off CJ-2000 cruise missile.
There is no need to add in another variant of engine into military to complicate the logistics of PLAAF.
WS-18 looks identical to D30kp2. Who told you it supposed to look different? Chinese RE the D30kp2 but the metallurgy has improved result in better lifespan and higher thrust.I thought they were still using that D-30KP-2 engines, not the WS-18 or WS-20. The fact that the current engines look identical to the Russian ones does not bode well. Right now, the Y-20 can only hold around 50 tonnes, but with the WS-20 it can do around the mid 60's. Remember, copying engines is just as arduous and difficult, why not just design a new engine entirely? More importantly, China has a limited stockpile of D30KP2s and probably doesn't want more ...
I’m not sure about that ... why not just accept it that the Y-20’s engine is a D30kp2? Why would they make an identical WS-18 when there’s a WS-20 in the pipeline? And once again, copying engines is extremely difficult ... let alone making them look identical.WS-18 looks identical to D30kp2. Who told you it supposed to look different? Chinese RE the D30kp2 but the metallurgy has improved result in better lifespan and higher thrust.
I’m not sure about that ... why not just accept it that the Y-20’s engine is a D30kp2? Why would they make an identical WS-18 when there’s a WS-20 in the pipeline? And once again, copying engines is extremely difficult ... let alone making them look identical.