Would PAF have bombed Taj Mahal in 1971 ?

[Frankenstein]

If i am wrong correct me plzz...

As i heard once from Pakistani hero Mr. Zaid Hamid , he said that PAF pilots were ready to fly on suicide mission to Israel .

Terrorists who does not think even a sec before blowing themselves .

There is a difference between terrorism and patriotism, you dip sh!t, terrorists are brain washed incase you haven't noticed or didn't had much capacity to, and patriots die for there country

You call your soldiers terrorist??

 

[Frankenstein]

Exactly !!

They cannot comprehand the idea of unity in diversity. For them everything is religion and race. Let them enjoy their narrow mindness. No one listen to these poor chaps in real world. These types of internet forums are the only way where they can vent their frustration and anger. Listen and forget

look who is talking

my foot!

 

[FreekiN]

Firstly, if you are looking to argue with someone at a defence forum, at least try to identify that they aren't an ego-driven 13 year old.

Now to address your statement,

You could not "continue" to force your self on them anymore because you were defeated in full scale war ...and were forced out of there..they is no evidence to suggest ..that suddenly you had some kind of moral epiphany and decided to call it quits.

Pakistan surrendered not because of India's overwhelming overpopulation of the subcontinent, but because of it's geographical advantage over Bangladesh. Provided the war on the western front, which ended as a ceasefire.

Do me a favor and go to any Indian day parade, and see for yourself how many Sikhs show up.

Oh really? Can you say the same for India's Muslims? The atrocious ratio of 13.6:4 in the Indian military?

 

[trident2010]

look who is talking

my foot!

Truth hurts my friend ??

Welcome to real world

 

[Frankenstein]

A 17 years old Indian tried to manipulate richest guy in India to attack Pakistan, I don't expect much from them at all

edit: made this my signature, looks cool ;D

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Oh really? Can you say the same for India's Muslims? The atrocious ratio of 13.6:4 in the Indian military?

Not only Indian Muslims, but also South Indians too seems to not join. Or get recruited like the Northern Indians.

 

[Frankenstein]

Truth hurts my friend ??

Welcome to real world

Na truth dosent hurt, especially when some hypocrite says it

 

[MyPakistan1947]

You could not "continue" to force your self on them anymore because you were defeated in full scale war ...and were forced out of there..they is no evidence to suggest ..that suddenly you had some kind of moral epiphany and decided to call it quits.

Now you claim you are better without them..where was this realization when you killed countless of them to stay united.

For arguments sake lets say another part of Pakistan breaks away from it would claim the same for it too??

The MAIN reason we lost East Pakistan was because majority of those people didn't consider themselves Pakistani. Not because of bharat.

Anyways, why live 40 years in the past? Most people on this forum weren't even alive back then. New Pakistani generation are not emotional about Bangladesh. We don't even care about them.

 

[ares]

Firstly, if you are looking to argue with someone at a defence forum, at least try to identify that they aren't an ego-driven 13 year old.

Considering you are 17 or is it 18 now,you are hardly in a position to judge ..though your age, rarely reflects in your posts

Now to address your statement,




Pakistan surrendered not because of India's overwhelming overpopulation of the subcontinent, but because of it's geographical advantage over Bangladesh.

They had to surrender ..because they followed, wrong military strategy, amongst other things ..Defence of the East lies in the East and not in the west.

 

[FreekiN]

Considering you are 17 or is it 18 now,you are hardly in a position to judge ..though your age, rarely reflects in your posts

I've read more and know more than the average on this website. I haven't taken part in much debates lately. And no, you need to guess harder for my age.

Also, my age and upbringing into this have nothing to do with anything on this forum. State facts, state opinions, state whatever as long as it's appropriately presented in the right spot and the right point.

They had to surrender ..because they followed, wrong military strategy, amongst other things ..Defence of the East lies in the East and not in the west.

[citation needed]

 

[H2O3C4Nitrogen]

Bombed the TAJ MAHAL Fcuk Noee

 

[ares]

I've read more and know more than the average on this website. I haven't taken part in much debates lately. And no, you need to guess harder for my age.

I could unearth one of your posts ..stating it ..but it seems like hard work..and besides you already what I am talking about.

[citation needed]

What citation ..it's common sense ..had they deployed enough troops in East ..they would not have been run over like it did.

 

[Dance]

Typical day at PDF: stupid thread started by an indian and gets derailed by indian trolls by bringing irrelevant topics such as Bangladesh into the matter.

 

[FreekiN]

I could unearth one of your posts ..stating it ..but it seems like hard work..and besides you already what I am talking about.

Oh yes, I remember. But i've updated my point in my previous post.

This is a forum, btw. Not a political briefing to a president.

What citation ..it's common sense ..had they deployed enough troops in East ..they would not have run over like they did.

Jesus. How is that in any relation of what you just said?

"They had to surrender ..because they followed, wrong military strategy amongst other things"

Military population is not much of a strategy for Pakistan, nor an option. Keep in mind that Pakistan is 6 times smaller, no matter how many troops we deploy, we will always be outnumbered due to India's endlessly-increasing population. For India however, a high amount of troops saturated into an area is a strategy. i.e. Kashmir

The reason East Pakistani troops were 'run over' was because of it's geographical positioning and nothing more. Sure, numbering did play a part. Imagine sieging a fort. 300 people being sieged with a limited supply of resources and 400 people doing the seige with an infinite supply of resources. Obviously, the besiegers, are going to win.

 

[rajan_united]

not pakistan but trolls think it. if we do so we have also some places that are also emotional buildings for pakistan like these

QUOTE]

lol !!! You