What's new

Wikileaks : Secret Afghanistan War logs

Afghanistan war logs: How the IED became Taliban's weapon of choice

It begins with a relative trickle in the east of Afghanistan in 2004. Five years later it is the Taliban's favoured weapon across the country and the biggest killer of coalition soldiers by a large margin.

But the IED – improvised explosive device – not only strikes foreign troops on ground patrols and in road convoys, it is also an indiscriminate terror weapon killing and injuring thousands of civilians.

The unprecedented mass of data in the leaked war logs presents the most comprehensive picture yet of successful violence by the Taliban. The soaring number of attacks by these increasingly powerful homemade bombs can clearly be seen to be focused in the southern and eastern provinces.

In 2004, according to the logs, there were 308 makeshift bombs; last year there were 7,155. Taliban fighters in total planted more than 16,000 IEDs in those five years. :blink:

On 22 June last year, in Khost in eastern Afghanistan, the US military log says: "A little boy picked up the IED and it exploded in his hands killing him. The IED blast caused people to gather around the little boy, then a motorcycle drive up and detonated his suicide IED motorcycle." The end result was reported to be nine civilians killed and 42 wounded.

On 7 October 2009, six locals were going to Sarobi in eastern Afghanistan to buy cattle "when they struck an IED, instantly killing three of the occupants. A 70-year-old male suffered a gaping head, a 40-year-old suffered an eye injury and [a] 20-year-old had his ear drums blown out".

The logs suggest that Taliban insurgents have killed or injured at least 7,000 Afghan civilians in IED attacks between 2004 and 2009. The number has increased tenfold over that time. Civilian casualties rose even after Mullah Omar, the Taliban's spiritual leader, ordered insurgents to avoid killing bystanders.

In May last year, he said suicide bombers should only attack "high and important targets". "A brave son of Islam should not be used for lower and useless targets. The utmost effort should be made to avoid civilian casualties." He called on his fighters to win over the Afghan people.

Yet in August, 429 civilians were killed or wounded by IEDs, the highest recorded in the logs. Investigators working for the UN said in January that the Taliban were responsible for more civilian deaths than the US-led military coalition. They criticise the Taliban for "indiscriminately" killing civilians by detonating IEDs in crowded markets or on busy roads.

Taliban fighters appear to have been prepared to blow up large numbers of people in order to assassinate a single target, such as a high-ranking government official or police chief.

For example, in February 2008, a suicide bomber caused havoc at a dog-fighting meet near Kandahar, killing or injuring more than 100 civilians, in a successful quest to assassinate one tribal leader. Another attack in September 2007 claimed around 70 civilian casualties near markets in Helmand province.

"It appears to be a suicide attack intended to target a police chief, Aram Attulah. The explosion killed this police chief and 10 of his security detail," reads the log.

IED attacks this year will be higher than ever, according to the latest Pentagon figures. The numbers are rising even though the US military has spent $17bn struggling to neutralise IEDs in Afghanistan and elsewhere. :what:

Since 2006 the Taliban can be seen to have changed tactics. The insurgents began to rely more on IEDs than confrontational gun battles. Lieutenant General Michael Oates, the director of the Pentagon agency in charge of countering IEDs, admitted in March: "I don't think you can defeat the IED as a weapon system. It is too easy to use."

The IEDs are built in a variety of ways with the aim of inducing permanent anxiety among troops and the populace. Some are detonated remotely by a transmitter such as a mobile phone or hand-held radio, while others are ignited by thin wires attached to switches such as washing machine timers. Others are "victim-operated" – they go off when the unsuspecting soldier or civilian steps on a trip wire or a pressure plate.

The insurgents load bombs into lorries and crash them into targets. The logs are replete with accounts of suicide-bombers ("PBIEDs", or person-borne IEDs, according to the US army jargon) who strap bombs to their bodies. A typical example occurred on 7 May 2009 in the town of Gereshk in Helmand when a "PBIED …crashed his motorcycle into a patrol, as he got to his feet he detonated himself".

Horse-drawn carts have been also used to explode the bombs next to patrolling soldiers.

The highest number of IED attacks occurred on three consecutive days – 18-20 August last year – when the country voted for a new president. The Taliban had vowed to disrupt the election and planted between 33 and 37 IEDs on each of the three days, killing or wounding at least 100 in the coalition and among their Afghan allies. Several attacks were made on polling stations and staff.

According to the logs, the Americans have located and disabled more bombs than have exploded, yet they have so far been unable to halt the attacks.

The logs record that 8,582 of the Taliban's IEDs were found and cleared, but 7,553 successfully exploded


Afghanistan war logs: How the IED became Taliban's weapon of choice | World news | The Guardian
 
Afghan war logs: inquiry launched into source of leaks

The US military has launched an inquiry to find the source of tens of thousands of classified American documents on the war in Afghanistan that were leaked to the media.


chinook-afghanista_1683449c.jpg

The documents - detailing military operations between 2004 and 2009 - disclosing how Nato forces have killed scores of civilians in unreported incidents in Afghanistan.

More than 90,000 documents were leaked to the Wikileaks website and shown to several newspapers around the world.

The release of the huge file of classified papers is described as one of the biggest leaks in US military history.

The White House condemned the publication of the data which it said threatened the safety of coalition forces.

A spokesman said: "We strongly condemn the disclosure of classified information by individuals and organisations, which puts the lives of the US and partner service members at risk and threatens our national security."

The documents also include references to incidents involving British troops.

A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: "We have been unable to corroborate these claims in the short time available and it would be inappropriate to speculate on specific cases without further verification of the alleged actions.

"Reducing the risk to local civilians has always formed an essential part of planning for all military operations carried out by UK forces and we always do our utmost to ensure that we shield the civilian population from violence during the course of any military activity.

The leaked documents reveal how:

* A secret "black" unit of special forces hunts down Taliban leaders for "kill or capture" without trial.

* The US covered up evidence that the Taliban have acquired heat-seaking surface-to-air missiles.

* The coalition is increasingly using deadly Reaper drones to hunt and kill Taliban targets by remote control from a base in Nevada.

* The Taliban have caused growing carnage with a massive escalation of their roadside bombing campaign, which has killed more than 2,000 civilians to date.

Although many of the claims have been aired previously, the leak is highly embarrassing.

The documents claim that 195 civilians have been improperly killed and 174 wounded. Many are innocent motorcylists or drivers shot after being suspected of being suicide bombers.

The growing evidence that Iran and Pakistan in supporting and fuelling the insurgency is also detailed in the documents.

Pakistan's ambassador to the United States insisted his country was fully committed to fighting Islamic insurgents.

Ambassador Husain Haqqani called the release of the file "irresponsible", saying it consisted of "unprocessed" reports from the field.

The founder of Wikileaks said the angry reaction showed that the whistleblower website is succeeding in its mission.

Julian Assange, 39, an Australian former hacker and computer programmer, told the Guardian: "If journalism is good it is controversial by its nature.

"It is the role of good journalism to take on powerful abuses, and when powerful abuses are taken on, there is always a back reaction."

Until the Afghan dossier, Wikileaks' most prominent scoop was a video posted in April this year showing a US Apache helicopter strike in Baghdad in 2007.

The not-for-profit website organisation has also been responsible for publishing a Guantanamo Bay training manual, BNP membership lists and details of Sarah Palin's private emails.

The source of the leak to the website is so far unknown.

The last person suspected of providing classified material to the outlet is American soldier Bradley Manning who has been charged with two counts of misconduct for allegedly providing video footage of a US Apache helicopter strike in Iraq in 2007 in which around a dozen people were gunned down in broad daylight.

Afghan war logs: inquiry launched into source of leaks - Telegraph
 
Isn't it a popular pakistani perception that afghan taliban(GOOD TALIBAN)Are never pakistan's enemy and they would never do anything against PA(even after pakistan is allied to wot).When discussing about indian support to ttp,most of(not all)pakistani netizens say ttp is different from afghan taliban,who in fact have advised ttp against fighting PA.Isn't all this because most(not all) pakistani citizens believe there is some sort of secret cooperation between PA/ISI and afghan taliban?wiki leak report just favours that perception.
 
Isn't it a popular pakistani perception that afghan taliban(GOOD TALIBAN)Are never pakistan's enemy and they would never do anything against PA(even after pakistan is allied to wot).When discussing about indian support to ttp,most of(not all)pakistani netizens say ttp is different from afghan taliban,who in fact have advised ttp against fighting PA.Isn't all this because most(not all) pakistani citizens believe there is some sort of secret cooperation between PA/ISI and afghan taliban?wiki leak report just favours that perception.

If you would have read closely then you would have found that all the logs implicating ISI are been reported by Junior officials & Afghans officials

"[F]or all their eye-popping details," writes the Guardian's Declan Walsh, "the intelligence files, which are mostly collated by junior officers relying on informants and Afghan officials, fail to provide a convincing smoking gun for ISI complicity."

The logs of war: Do the Wikileaks documents really tell us anything new? | FP Passport

they way Media has pointed its guns towards Pakistan/ISI, it seems there was indeed a motive behind these leaks or may be after the leaks they have decided to use Pakistan for damage control...
 
its really hard to swallow that 90,000 doc's were leaked and no one in US Intelligence knew about whats going to happen.... i agree with the member above u said that all this was preplanned... there was another report leaked saying that iran is also helping Taliban.....

Looks like some evil power is trying to frame US and Pak in something or trying to blackmail them...:coffee::pakistan::pdf:
 
Pakistan denies Wikileaks reports it 'aided Taliban'​

26 July 2010 Last updated at 02:33 ET

_48482010_009854441-1.jpg

The White House says the records refer to a period before the current US strategy came into effect

Pakistan has strongly denied claims in leaked US military records that its intelligence agency, the ISI, backed the Taliban in the war in Afghanistan.

The whistleblower website Wikileaks published more than 90,000 leaked US military documents and gave advance access to three news publications.

The documents reportedly reveal Nato concerns that Pakistan and Iran are helping the Taliban.

They are also said to detail unreported killings of Afghan civilians.

The Pakistani ambassador in Washington said the "unprocessed" reports did "not reflect the current onground realities".

"I think that the American leadership knows what Pakistan is doing," Husein Haqqani told the BBC.

"We have paid a price in treasure and in blood over the last two years. More Pakistanis have been killed by terrorists, including our military officers and intelligence service officials.

"We are not going to be distracted by something like this," he said.

The huge cache of classified papers - described as one of the biggest leaks in US military history - was given to the New York Times, the Guardian and the German news magazine, Der Spiegel.

The documents showed Pakistan actively collaborated with the Afghan insurgency, the New York Times reported.

The reports also suggest:

The Taliban has had access to portable heat-seeking missiles to shoot at aircraft.

A secret US unit of army and navy special forces has been engaged on missions to "capture or kill" top insurgents.

Many civilian casualties - caused by Taliban roadside bombs and Nato missions that went wrong - have gone unreported.

The BBC's diplomatic correspondent Bridget Kendall says that although the documents reveal no dramatic new insights, they show the difficulties of the war and the civilan death toll.

The reports offer an unvarnished and grim picture of the Afghan war, she adds.

In a statement, US National Security Adviser Gen James Jones said such classified information "could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk, and threaten our national security".

He said the documents covered the period from 2004 to 2009, before President Obama "announced a new strategy with a substantial increase in resources for Afghanistan".

'Civilian deaths'

Another US official said that Wikileaks - which specialises in making public untraceable material from whistleblowers - was not an objective news outlet and described it as an organisation that opposes US policy in Afghanistan.

But the head of the Foreign Relations Committee in the US Senate said that "however illegally these documents came to light, they raise serious questions about the reality of America's policy toward Pakistan and Afghanistan".

"Those policies are at a critical stage and these documents may very well underscore the stakes and make the calibrations needed to get the policy right more urgent," said Democrat Senator John Kerry.

Wikileaks is releasing the set of documents under the title Afghan War Diary.

It says it has delayed the release of about 15,000 reports from the archive as part of a "harm minimisation process demanded by our source".

The Guardian and the New York Times say they had no contact with the original source of the leak, but spent weeks crosschecking the information.

The reports come as Nato says it is investigating reports that as many as 45 civilians died in an air strike in Helmand province on Friday.

Although an initial Nato investigation found no evidence, a BBC journalist visiting Regey village spoke to several people who said they had witnessed the incident.

They said the attack had come in daylight as dozens sheltered from fighting in nearby Joshani.

A Nato spokesman said international forces went to great measures to avoid civilian casualties.

"The safety of the Afghan people is very important to the International Security Assistance Forces," Lt Col Chris Hughes added.

BBC News - Pakistan denies Wikileaks reports it 'aided Taliban'

:police:
 
right now a supercomputer at NSA will actually be analyzing our comments and the comments from public world over and will be applying different algorithms over it to generate a report of how people respond to these leaks. The results will be helpful for making and simulating future decisions and actions .. .. !!!!
 
One junior level IO and a single USB disk or any other storage device.

Bradley Manning has been accused of using a CD disguised as a Lady Gaga album to smuggle out data from the secure terminal he was using. He might be the source behind this or any other fellow can be behind this as well.

I am not sure if all 92,000 documents would be in one place. What do you think?
 
they way Media has pointed its guns towards Pakistan/ISI, it seems there was indeed a motive behind these leaks or may be after the leaks they have decided to use Pakistan for damage control...


Media will always point guns at Pakistan cause Pakistan is suppose to be alley for WOT. There nothing to cry about rest of the reports since all are talking about collateral damage which is a grey part of every war.
 
this will soon blow over. just when pakistan was building its nukes the headline everyday was Pakistan this Pakistan that, and eventually it stopped.

the information reported in these are by low level officers and are do not point to concrete evidence. it was reported in an msnbc news report.
 
First we were debunking academicians, then we started debunking countries concerned.
Now it has gone to higher level and we are still debunking audited reports (rojnamas of WOT in Punjabi). Then we will debunk USA himself at the end but will never get out of denial (paira te pani na pan dayeoo). Why can we agree right here that Pakistan agencies have to serve their national interests only.
 
JACKPOT!!!

Much of the information — raw intelligence and threat assessments gathered from the field in Afghanistan— cannot be verified and likely comes from sources aligned with Afghan intelligence, which considers Pakistan an enemy, and paid informants. Some describe plots for attacks that do not appear to have taken place.

NYT: Pakistan spy service aids insurgents, reports say - World news - The New York Times - msnbc.com

The classified documents are largely what's called "raw intelligence" — reports from junior officers in the field that analysts use to advise policymakers, rather than any high-level government documents that state U.S. government policy.

U.S.: Afghan war leaks put lives 'at risk' - World news - South and Central Asia - Afghanistan - msnbc.com
 
First we were debunking academicians, then we started debunking countries concerned.
Now it has gone to higher level and we are still debunking audited reports (rojnamas of WOT in Punjabi). Then we will debunk USA himself at the end but will never get out of denial (paira te pani na pan dayeoo). Why can we agree right here that Pakistan agencies have to serve their national interests only.

Way too simplistic and logically incorrect reply.

Whether someone is an academic or not is irrelevant when it comes to these issues.

Secondly, just because a lot of noise is being made - which can be done if a state as powerful as the US wants to -, it doesn't make it necessarily.

The denial argument is a cheap and convenient argument. Very simplistic too, might I add. It's as good as me saying that you're in denial of Indian involvement. It doesn't mean much without clear evidence.
 
First we were debunking academicians, then we started debunking countries concerned.
Now it has gone to higher level and we are still debunking audited reports (rojnamas of WOT in Punjabi). Then we will debunk USA himself at the end but will never get out of denial (paira te pani na pan dayeoo). Why can we agree right here that Pakistan agencies have to serve their national interests only.

and they r doing it pretty well arent they..... every country keeps her national interests 1st, going by ur logic we are'nt doing anything different..... its a bigger game being played.. every one wants a piece of cake(Afghan), but so far from these report and cries from other countries its pretty clear that so far ISI have out played others..... :azn:
 
Back
Top Bottom