What's new

Wikileaks : Secret Afghanistan War logs

Pakistan denies Wikileaks reports it 'aided Taliban'


Pakistan has strongly denied claims in leaked US military records that its intelligence agency, the ISI, backed the Taliban in the war in Afghanistan.

The whistleblower website Wikileaks published more than 90,000 leaked US military documents and gave advance access to three news publications.

The documents reportedly reveal Nato concerns that Pakistan and Iran are helping the Taliban.

They are also said to detail unreported killings of Afghan civilians.

The Pakistani ambassador in Washington said the "unprocessed" reports did "not reflect the current onground realities".

"I think that the American leadership knows what Pakistan is doing," Hassan Haqqani told the BBC.

"We have paid a price in treasure and in blood over the last two years. More Pakistanis have been killed by terrorists, including our military officers and intelligence service officials.

"We are not going to be distracted by something like this," he said.

The huge cache of classified papers - described as one of the biggest leaks in US military history - was given to the New York Times, the Guardian and the German news magazine, Der Spiegel.The White House has condemned the leaks as "irresponsible".

The documents showed Pakistan actively collaborated with the Afghan insurgency, the New York Times reported.

The reports also suggest:

The Taliban has had access to portable heat-seeking missiles to shoot at aircraft.
A secret US unit of army and navy special forces has been engaged on missions to "capture or kill" top insurgents.
Many civilian casualties - caused by Taliban roadside bombs and Nato missions that went wrong - have gone unreported.
The BBC's diplomatic correspondent Bridget Kendall says that although the documents reveal no dramatic new insights, they show the difficulties of the war and the civilan death toll.

The reports offer an unvarnished and grim picture of the Afghan war, she adds.

In a statement, US National Security Adviser Gen James Jones said such classified information "could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk, and threaten our national security".

He said the documents covered the period from 2004 to 2009, before President Obama "announced a new strategy with a substantial increase in resources for Afghanistan".

'Civilian deaths'
Another US official said that Wikileaks - which specialises in making public untraceable material from whistleblowers - was not an objective news outlet and described it as an organisation that opposes US policy in Afghanistan.

But the head of the Foreign Relations Committee in the US Senate said that "however illegally these documents came to light, they raise serious questions about the reality of America's policy toward Pakistan and Afghanistan".

"Those policies are at a critical stage and these documents may very well underscore the stakes and make the calibrations needed to get the policy right more urgent," said Democrat Senator John Kerry.

Wikileaks is releasing the set of documents under the title Afghan War Diary.

It says it has delayed the release of about 15,000 reports from the archive as part of a "harm minimisation process demanded by our source".

The Guardian and the New York Times say they had no contact with the original source of the leak, but spent weeks crosschecking the information.

The reports come as Nato says it is investigating reports that as many as 45 civilians died in an air strike in Helmand province on Friday.

Although an initial Nato investigation found no evidence, a BBC journalist visiting Regey village spoke to several people who said they had witnessed the incident.

They said the attack had come in daylight as dozens sheltered from fighting in nearby Joshani.

A Nato spokesman said international forces went to great measures to avoid civilian casualties.

"The safety of the Afghan people is very important to the International Security Assistance Forces," Lt Col Chris Hughes added.
 
Ouch! But still every one is specifically pointing fingers at ISI, I have a feeling that this leak is a deliberate one, How can US let go of 92,000 Documents huh!!!

One junior level IO and a single USB disk or any other storage device.

Bradley Manning has been accused of using a CD disguised as a Lady Gaga album to smuggle out data from the secure terminal he was using. He might be the source behind this or any other fellow can be behind this as well.
 
its really hard to swallow that 90,000 doc's were leaked and no one in US Intelligence knew about whats going to happen.... i agree with the member above u said that all this was preplanned... there was another report leaked saying that iran is also helping Taliban.....
 
Last edited:
Anybody know how to access the ISI reports as well as the Kayani reports?
 
Hmm seems like another conspiracy akin to Iran-Contra or Watergate but honestly it doesn’t make sense. And about what’s written against ISI, its nothing new we all have been hearing this for last few years. At the end of the day US can claim foul play by ISI but if they can’t trust them, who can they trust?
 
I still refuse to believe that this leak is not a deliberate one, every newspaper, Western & Indian are jumping up & down with ISI in the line of fire & Indians are like 'See we told ya', This one is a deliberate leak
 
NEW YORK: Polish intelligence had, a week before the 2008 Indian embassy bombing, warned of a possible Taliban attack on Indian interests in the Afghan capital with the "main goal" to show its ability to attack on every object in Kabul, according to a document leaked by whistleblower site WikiLeaks.

The document on possible attack on the Indian embassy is part of a massive leak of 92,000 intelligence reports that suggested that the war in Afghanistan is going badly for the US and Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) is fuelling the insurgency in the war-torn country.

Advance copies of the leak were made available to three publications - The New York Times, British daily newspaper Guardian, and German weekly Der Spiegel, which made some excerpts available.

The document dealing with the Indian embassy is titled 'Threat Report: Threat to Indian Embassy.'

The date of information is June 30, 2008, while the date of report is July 1, 2008. The organisation involved is "Taliban Center" and the Report number is 75010708.

"Taliban are planning to carry out an attack on the Indian embassy in Kabul. TB (Taliban) designated an engineer to take this action," the document reads.

"He intends to use stolen ANA/ANP (Afghan National Army/ Afghan National Police) car, and wears stolen uniform. He speaks Dari with distinct Iranian accent. Allegedly, he is the owner of a company," it added.

A suicide bomber rammed an explosives-laden car into the heavily fortified Indian embassy's gates in Kabul on July 7, 2008, killing 58 people and wounding more than 140.

Defence attache Brigadier R D Mehta and Counsellor Venkateswara Rao were killed when the suicide bomber targeted the embassy during the morning rush hour.

"INS (insurgents) are planning to divide into two groups: first will attack Indian embassy building, whilst the second group will engage security posts in front of MOI (ministry of interior), IOT (in order to) give possibility to escape attackers from the first group," the report said.

"Budget for this action is about $1,20,000. The main goal of this operation is to show TB's (Taliban) abilities to carry out attack on every object in Kabul."

Other documents strongly indicate that Pakistan's ISI is supporting the insurgency in Afghanistan, as well as plotting with Taliban leaders to assassinate Afghan leaders.

The New York Times pointed out that it has been difficult for the US to pin Pakistan's spy agency directly to an attack orchestrated by the Taliban.

But the assault on the Indian embassy led the CIA's then deputy director Stephen R Kappes to immediately go to Islamabad to confront the ISI with evidence that it had helped organise the attack.

Another leaked document, dated August 2008, identifies a colonel in the ISI plotting with a Taliban official to assassinate Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

However, there were no accompanying details and the report could not be verified.

Meanwhile, US national security advisor James Jones, in a statement, condemned the leaks as "irresponsible" and said that WikiLeaks had not contacted the US government before going public.

"The United States strongly condemns the disclosure of classified information by individuals and organisations which could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk, and threaten our national security," Jones said.

"WikiLeaks made no effort to contact us about these documents - the United States government learned from news organisations that these documents would be posted," he added.

Polish intelligence had warned of attack on Indian embassy in Kabul - India - The Times of India
 
*-Karzai assures india that her interests will b kept in mind
*- Hillary visits says she is certain that osama is in PAK & people in PAK establishment are aware of his location.....
*- Mullen visits PAK and says he is certain osama is in PAK
*- Anthony cries saying US aid will b used by ISI against india....
and here comes the leaks.......
 
"CEXC 1153: MOD 5, TURN IN, DERA ISMAIL KHAN DISTRICT, NORTH-WEST FRONTIER PROVINCE\n\nDate: 120001ZSEP07\n\n(S//REL) This MOD 5 was recovered by the SIG of the FIA in Pakistan. It had a 9 volt power source connected to the MOD 5, with an electric blasting cap connected to a booster which was attached to a fire extinguisher filled with high explosives. The MOD 5 was provided to FBI ALAT XXXX XXXXX assigned to the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan. All explosives were retained by the SIG. The turnover of this device from Pakistan to the FBI marks a significant event in cooperation."
 
"At 09150930 (L), 26 March 2007, Major General David M. Rodriguez, Commander, Combined Joint Task Force-82 and Regional Command-East conducted an office call with MAJ Matthew F. Ignatovig, Regional Command-East Liaison Officer to the Office of the Defense Representative, US Embassy, in the ODRP Ground Cell LNO shop at the US Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan. Additionally, CPT Brian T. Schneider, USCENTCOM ODRP Ground Cell. Lieutenant Colonel Edward C. Ledford, Chief, Regional Command-East Key Leader Engagements, served as the recorder. \n\nGeneral Observations: MG Rodriguezs office call immediately followed his visit to the US Ambassador to Pakistan, Ambassador Ryan Crocker.\nKey Points:\n?\tNeed to pass target packets up and down the chain of command of our PAKMIL counterparts: Embassy, RAO, Corps, Division, and Brigade.\n?\tNeed to focus analytical efforts on effects related to passing of targets to PAKMIL and prosecution of targets; then, when we become more proactive and aggressive in passing targets which include all possible releasable details and COAs, continue to track responses to determine effects.\n?\tNeed to work to see how far we can gowhile still remaining within regulatory boundsto release operational information to Pakistan. \n\nOther points of interest: At the conclusion of the office call, troops in contact were reported to the ground cell. Disposition of the incident was not concluded prior to departure."

---------- Post added at 01:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------

"Attended the ISAF OCG at Pakistan Military General Heaquarters today. Focus for ISAF OCG was JIOC and COMMS.\n\nEXECSUM follows:\n\nAttended as an observer, however, most discussions ended up circling around RC East; ODRP and RC East Liaison became participants.\n\nInitial greetings were by MG Pasha, the Director General Military Operations. He did not remain for the meeting.\n\nKey attendees included: \n\nPakistan; BG (P) Nasser, DMO. BG Maqsood, incoming DMO. BG Abid Hasan, Director of Military Intelligence(DMI). BG Niazi, 12 Corps OPS. BG Shaid, 11 Corps OPS. COL Bashir (JIOC), amp;amp;amp; comms officers for 11 amp;amp;amp; 12 Corps.\n\nISAF: MG Anderson, COL McGarr\n\nANA: BG Fiazi, COL ?\n\nODRP: COL Shapiro\n\nJIOC major points:\n\n-CIED and MISWG separate working groups may be redundant and need for dissipate over time. \n\n-BG Nasser expressed concern over negative perceptions. No need to remove separate working groups prematurely.\n\n-If determined not needed collaboratively, then remove the redundant CIED and MISWG.\n\n -Group agreed difference in real time versus future ops for Intel. \n\n -BG Nasser expressed gratitude for all the U.S. has provided for communications.\n\n -A medium is needed for communicating Intel down to the operator.\n\n - BG Nasser shared FATA background. \n\n - Not typical area for PAKMIL.\n\n - Frontier Corps habitual \n\n - HUMINT particularly challenging. Source is given away. Lifestyle change, good clothes. \n\n - Trend of beheadings; when a person is known informant, notes on body with accusations against PAKMIL\n\n - Closed society in the FATA.\n\n - Incoming DMO, BG Maqsood comments:\n\n - information sharing is the challenge\n\n - must do all we can to build confidence in each other on both sides of the border: Border flag meetings, etc.\n\n - Perceptions must be right\n\n - more BFMs\n\n - ODRP, COL Shapiro comments:\n\n - Expressed we must enable intel to support the soldier on the ground\n\n - Break the enemyamp;amp;apos;amp;amp;apos;s decision cycle\n\n - Stop IEDs, and the beheading of Maliks that are friendly to the government of Pakistan\n\n - Operate as if we are one Army\n\n Comments on Liaison:\n\n- Resistance for tactical level LNOs (in BNamp;amp;apos;amp;amp;apos;s and BDEamp;amp;apos;amp;amp;apos;s in Pakistan), best alternative is the Border Surveillance Centers (BSC).\n\n- BG Nasser fully supportive of BSC concept and wants to proceed. Implied he wants to see the concept developed and man it.\n\n- RC East LNO in Peshawar with 11 Corps/Frontier Corps is very routine and good.\n\n- RC East LNO in Embassy is very good.\n\n- BG Nasser wants to undue any challenges or problems which hinder the amp;amp;quot;one-nessamp;amp;quot; of the three armies (ISAF, ANA, PAKMIL). BG Nasser wants to use BSC as the concept. If we proceed with BSC, we can proceed with tactical destruction of the enemy.\n\n- ANA in agreement.\n\n- BG Nasser wants to make BSC acceptable, so when coalition is gone, set to keep PAKMIL and ANSF together.\n\n Communications brief (11 Corps officer)...opposite RC East on the border.\n\n ****Personal comments: take with a grain of salt, very one sided, not collaborative brief, not the most competent comms officer briefing. Not set up well by ISAF, was not vetted through ISAF J6, RC East J6, RC South J6, CSTCA J6. No J6 representatives present from ISAF, RC South, ANA, or RC East.\n\n - 11 Corps OPS officer expressed these were minor points by his comms officer, overall great improvements.\n\n - No/low response from US MIL on radio checks\n\n - Occasional response on TAC CHAT from US MIL\n\n - Equipment faulty, no reserves available.\n\n - Lot of time is spent in repair process, as a result, affected locations remain out of communications. \n\n - Sets sent for repair come back after 2-3 months.\n\n - No alternative means of communication available for use in case of failure of tactical level comms.\n\n - Speakers provided are very helpful for both sides.\n\n - 11 Corps comms officer recommendations\n\n - If no comms with post commander, the next higher level will be informed\n\n - Repair sets available for replacement\n\n - Language challenges overcome\n\n - Thuraya checks initiated by US MIL as per SOP.\n\n- BG Nasser commented, letamp;amp;apos;amp;amp;apos;s put our house in order. RC East always very helpful. It is both sides that need improvement with radio checks. Collaboratively commented the comms have improved greatly over the last month.\n\nWe expressed the J6 comms team was just here in Pakistan working hard on these issues and this is a major working group for the upcoming BSSM. \n\nCommunications brief (12 Corps officer)....opposite RC South and small portion of RC East.\n\n- Thurya limitations, base station desires. Minutes.\n\n- Procurement of more Harris. Can ISAF do it?\n\n- BG Nasser does not want to tax resources, not keen to receiving more communication equipment. But bottom line, RC South not talking cross border.\n\n- BG Nasser suggested working group for comms, Paks want to pay for it, but for what? Common communications means a goal for working group.\n\n- 12 Corps playing catch up to 11 Corps and RC East.\n\nClosing Comments:\n\nBG Nasser: Request for information for RC East for upcoming BSSM: Are there 2 extra U.S. BNs in RC East? Where do we deploy these units to complement each other on both sides of the border? Share information on each otheramp;amp;apos;amp;amp;apos;s posts at the next BSSM (share the COP). Communications, exchange of all numbers, morning and evening comms reports agreed to by both sides of the border.\n\nBG Nasseramp;amp;apos;amp;amp;apos;s comments in regardamp;amp;apos;amp;amp;apos;s to the spring offensive:\n\n Enemy: \n\n - Frequency of operation will increase. \n\n - Donamp;amp;apos;amp;amp;apos;t see large attacks. Small Groups.\n\n - Use of IEDs\n\n - Try to build a sense of insecurity\n\n PAKMIL:\n\n - 2 additional BDEs deploying to FATA. 1 already there, other will be in place 15 March.\n\n - Curfew for 3 KM along the border at night.\n\n - If out at night, considered enemy.\n\n - Will fire regardless of peace agreements\n\n - On selected areas, 32 KM of fencing\n\n - Going after foreigners regardless of peace agreements\n\n - Places like Mir Ali, deployment along and around such areas, controlled entrance in and out\n\n - Search of houses for foreigners underway\n\n - Orders already given to 11 Corps and the Brigades.\n\nBG Nasser asked for future feedback from ISAF on what they are doing in preparation for spring offensive.\n\nBG Nasser asked why the TPC on the 14th was cancelled by ISAF.\n\n \nMAJ Matthew F. Ignatovig\nRC East LNO to Pakistan\nODRP Ground Cell\nDSN: 318-451-0013/12"
 
For all the hue and cry in the international media, they'd pay attention to the fact that these reports were a property of the US government herself. And CIA, isn't exactly a bunch of noobs who can be taken on a ride whenever the need be. If these reports actually meant such a huge deal, United States would have severed its ties with Pakistan, a long time ago.

Americans, as of now, want a pliant, pro-Western government in Afghanistan. Indians want a pro-India government there. While Iran wants its proxies amongst Tajiks and Uzbeks to be well taken care of. Then why the f' does it matter if Pakistan wants the same? Suddenly everyone previously advocating 'might is right', that 'international relations are void of ethics', now has grown a conscience?

If US is feeling 'sucked' into this war knee deep, it's not because they were double crossed by anyone. Hell, anyone with an IQ of above 30 knew that Pakistan Army wasn't exactly killing a lot of AF-Taliban back in 2003/4/5 - how come the US did not? It's only because they want the same end-result in Afghanistan, which Pakistan does.

If it's alright for the US to seek inroads into Taliban ranks, how come is it such a sin for Pakistan to want the same? Should the Haqqani network severe its ties with AQ and / or refuse to attack US troops, will US still attack them? Right!

And if Taliban weren't exactly an prime example of character or human rights, what are United States' choices amongst leaders in AF (Dostum, Karzai's brother et al); Koala bears?
 
bump on how to access the ISI Reports you posted Mr. Sparkling Away. Do you have the link? Thank you .

:)
 
"Brig Gen Tariq opened the meeting with introductory comments and invited all to participate in a sincere and frank discussion inviting all comments to address topics that are currently causing friction, or animosity between tri-partite representatives. He specifically addressed cross-border intrusion by CF RW assets suggesting that we all improve coordination when conducting operations IVO the border. BG Tariq indicated that CF aircraft had flown into Pakistan on more than one occasion. TF RAPTOR Comment: On all occasions when conducting operations IVO the border, MAJ Isaac Battle (PAKMIL LNO) is informed of the concept of our operations; to include DTG, duration, and location. In the future, we will continue to coordinate with the PAKMIL LNO and inform the respective Regimental HQs of our operations IVO their checkpoints (Mohmand Rifles, Khyber Rifles, or Kurram Rifles). COL Preysler acknowledged BG Tariqs concerns and described the future initiative to mark all Afghan Checkpoints; further assisting pilots with aerial recognition of the border, both day and night. BG Tariq suggested that numbers not be used in the marking system for fear that miscreants would use the same numbers to their advantage in directing their operations.\n\nCOL Akram expressed his appreciation for the hospitality demonstrated and briefly described his responsibilities for operations along 850 km of border area. He subscribed to two primary roles sustainment of security along the border area and reduction of bribes. COL Akram vehemently suggested that bribes can only be stopped through mutual cooperation and law enforcement on both sides of the border. In response, BG Tariq remarked that bribery and smuggling are a part of the peoples culture and doubted that either could be eliminated in the short term. BG Tariq suggested that respect for the culture and a focus on education of the people will go along way in reducing corruption highlighting again that it will take time. He described that responsibility for law enforcement falls largely upon the Frontier Corps and that of Customs Inspectors in Pakistan. Diverting attention away from the border, BG Tariq offered that all forces should focus our efforts through mutual cooperation on the common enemy (of the world).\n\nCOL Preysler reviewed some changes associated with the border security strategy, placing emphasis on Hilux-capable infiltration routes and repositioning of ABP forces. He also reviewed the need for a better marking system and alluded to BG Tariqs previous concerns. In response to border markings, BG Tariq highlighted the need for continued diplomatic review of markings to occur within disputed border areas.\n\nLTC Milhorn then introduced the additional attendees and prompted CPT Krumm (Raptor S2) to provide a brief Intel Overview and highlight areas of concern. The following topics were discussed:\n\tHIG members use of a pharmaceutical corporation (Liedrlee Pharmaceuticals) to ship raw IED components, including ICOMs, remote controls, mines, blasting caps, and cell phones into Afghanistan \n\tIncrease use of women in burkas to smuggle in suicide vests lack of inspections attributed to no women inspectors. \n\tMiscreants (ISI, in this case) are giving money and providing quality of life improvements to Afridi tribal elders to amplify anti-IRoA propaganda and weaken support of the central government of Afghanistan; resulting in staged protests and broadcasts over Spinghar Radio \n\tDescription of criminal (and economic-driven) activities against CF supply lines; largely related to Afridi Tribal-owned transportation companies. Though blame is often placed on miscreant behavior, PAKMIL and CF agree that most of the destruction is associated with a follow-on business transaction (selling of goods and insurance claims). \n\nLTC Milhorn reviewed the current status of the Border Surveillance Center at Torkham. BG Tariq requested that 11th Corps be briefed on the concept of the BSC and indicated that his staff would do so (with products previously presented at the last BSSM in Peshawar).\n\nAdditional topics of discussion before, during, and after lunch are summarized below:\n\tCOL Preysler inquired about the Mohmand Tribe leadership; specifically asking if there was one senior tribal elder who represented both Afghan and Pakistan. BG Tariq responded, That there is no single Chief. Consequently, he specified that there are several sub-tribes with each having a designated elder. \n\tIn describing the Mohmand Agency, BG Tariq characterized the region as being more mature than other areas. He highlighted that women rarely wear burkas and very few weapons are carried by men in the area. Additionally, people prize education within the Mohmand Agency. After describing a recent cross-border shura in Goshta District, Afghanistan, both BG Tariq and COL Zubair cautioned discussions of projects within the area. Both indicated a need to involve tribal elders and a need to maintain a balance of economic development across the borders; of which CF can only influence projects in Afghanistan. \n\tReference drug trafficking, PAKMIL reps agreed that narcotics are not a significant problem in their respective areas. Confinement as a type of punishment is not effective against the tribal areas; however, destruction of homes and significant fines are used effectively. All agreed that miscreant/insurgent activities and narco-trafficing are intertwined; with insurgents providing safe passage at a price for drug traffickers. \n\tCOL Preysler inquired of how best to improve communications. Reference was made to the Joint Communications SOP and adherence to routine communications checks. \n\tBG Tariq spoke of our common enemy and described that you need only one of only three fears to negotiate with the miscreants (or anyone for that matter): Fear of killing the miscreant, Fear of killing the miscreants family, or Economic Fear. According to BG Tariq, our common enemy has none of these fears contributing to a long lasting war. \n\nAfter lunch, CPT Krumm met with MAJ Asim and other PAKMIL reps and thoroughly reviewed the contents of the information folder provided by CF. Contents included Updated ABP BCPs, Buckeye imagery of ABP/PAKMIL checkpoints and templated infiltration routes along the Khyber and Mohmand Rifle border areas; Border Surveillance Center Fact Sheet and photos of Torkham Gate; and the recommended Border Marking System for Afghan Checkpoints. \n\nAt conclusion, pledged support and continued cooperation was offered by all attendees. Lastly, LTC Milhorn suggested that the next BFM be held within the next 4-6 weeks at Torkham Gate (during which time a site visit will be conducted at the designated BSC location)."

---------- Post added at 01:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:20 PM ----------

"We first heard of the incident through our HCT 40. One of their sources called and stated that a fuel truck had exploded in Pakistan and that there were 200 injured and several killed. We then had A/Bat call the ABP at T-Gate to gather further info. The ABP reported that there were 3-5 fuel trucks on fire and several injured. Shortly after there was a report through MIRC that there were 20-25 trucks on fire. I decided to go to the gate to deconflict the reports. We spun up A/Bat to take me and 1LT Barnes down to the gate. When we were leaving injured personnel started to arrive at the FOB. Our medics started treating the injured and had called a medevac for 3 severely burned victims. There were approx 40 injured that showed up, most with minor injures and were quickly pushed to the local hospital.\r\nWe SP\031ed for the gate and noticed heavy commercial traffic and pedestrian traffic. Once we arrived we met with the ABP CDR XO to find out what had occurred. We were informed that they heard 3 explosions inside Pakistan and rushed to the gate. They could not find any Pakistan officer so they called their higher and requested fire trucks to be sent to render aid to the Pakistanis. They informed us that they had two ABP Soldiers at the scene to render any assistance needed. Their Soldiers reported 200 injured and 40-50 killed with 30-35 fuel trucks on fire. We then attempted to call Haji Zarpachah, the political officer in Pakistan that we had met with earlier in the week to find out further information. We were not able to contact him on the phone so we had the ABP go down to locate him and bring him to the ABP compound. \r\nHaji Zarpachah, the Pakistan political officer arrived at ABP compound. He informed us that the Pakistan fire trucks could not get to the fire because the road from Pechwar was blocked. He stated that there were approx 60 injured and none killed. Of the injured all but 8 seriously injured were sent to Landi Kotel and the seriously injured were sent to Pechwar. He stated that there were 70 fuel trucks in the holding area when the explosion occurred and they were all ISAF fuel trucks. Appox 30 fuel truck burned and the others were moved out of the area. In addition there were 25 shops that were burned. He stated that the explosion did not cause the injuries but rather the burning fuel that rained down immediately following the explosion did. It was his opinion that the explosion was caused by an RPG hitting the fuel truck. At the time of the incident the holding area had little personnel in it. Most of the drivers had left the area. When asked who he felt was responsible he stated he had no idea. We then asked what assistance they required and he stated that they needed additional fire trucks. I then called the TOC and requested additional fire trucks be sent to the scene. The Governor of Nangarhar authorized addition fire trucks and medical assets to be sent to the scene. At this point there was nothing else we could assist with so we returned to FOB Torkhm."
 
Afghanistan war logs: Story behind biggest leak in intelligence history​

US authorities have known for weeks that they have suffered a haemorrhage of secret information on a scale which makes even the leaking of the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam war look limited by comparison.

The Afghan war logs, from which the Guardian reports today, consist of 92,201 internal records of actions by the US military in Afghanistan between January 2004 and December 2009 – threat reports from intelligence agencies, plans and accounts of coalition operations, descriptions of enemy attacks and roadside bombs, records of meetings with local politicians, most of them classified secret.

The Guardian's source for these is Wikileaks, the website which specialises in publishing untraceable material from whistleblowers, which is simultaneously publishing raw material from the logs.

Washington fears it may have lost even more highly sensitive material including an archive of tens of thousands of cable messages sent by US embassies around the world, reflecting arms deals, trade talks, secret meetings and uncensored opinion of other governments.

Wikileaks' founder, Julian Assange, says that in the last two months they have received yet another huge batch of "high-quality material" from military sources and that officers from the Pentagon's criminal investigations department have asked him to meet them on neutral territory to help them plug the sequence of leaks. He has not agreed to do so.

Behind today's revelations lie two distinct stories: first, of the Pentagon's attempts to trace the leaks with painful results for one young soldier; and second, a unique collaboration between the Guardian, the New York Times and Der Spiegel magazine in Germany to sift the huge trove of data for material of public interest and to distribute globally this secret record of the world's most powerful nation at war.

The Pentagon was slow to engage. The evidence they have now collected suggests it was last November that somebody working in a high-security facility inside a US military base in Iraq started to copy secret material. On 18 February Wikileaks posted a single document – a classified cable from the US embassy in Reykjavik to Washington, recording the complaints of Icelandic politicians that they were being bullied by the British and Dutch over the collapse of the Icesave bank; and the tart remark of an Icelandic diplomat who described his own president as "unpredictable". Some Wikileaks workers in Iceland claimed they saw signs that they were being followed after this disclosure.

But the Americans evidently were nowhere nearer to discovering the source when, on 5 April, Assange held a press conference in Washington to reveal US military video of a group of civilians in Baghdad, including two Reuters staff, being shot down in the street in 2007 by Apache helicopters: their crew could be heard crowing about their "good shooting" before destroying a van which had come to rescue a wounded man and which turned out to be carrying two children on its front seat.

It was not until late May that the Pentagon finally closed in on a suspect, and that was only after a very strange sequence of events. On 21 May, a Californian computer hacker called Adrian Lamo was contacted by somebody with the online name Bradass87 who started to swap instant messages with him. He was immediately extraordinarily open: "hi... how are you?… im an army intelligence analyst, deployed to eastern bagdad … if you had unprecedented access to classified networks, 14 hours a day, 7 days a week for 8+ months, what would you do?"

For five days, Bradass87 opened his heart to Lamo. He described how his job gave him access to two secret networks: the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network, SIPRNET, which carries US diplomatic and military intelligence classified "secret"; and the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System which uses a different security system to carry similar material classified up to "top secret". He said this had allowed him to see "incredible things, awful things … that belong in the public domain and not on some server stored in a dark room in Washington DC … almost criminal political backdealings … the non-PR version of world events and crises."

Bradass87 suggested that "someone I know intimately" had been downloading and compressing and encrypting all this data and uploading it to someone he identified as Julian Assange. At times, he claimed he himself had leaked the material, suggesting that he had taken in blank CDs, labelled as Lady Gaga's music, slotted them into his high-security laptop and lip-synched to nonexistent music to cover his downloading: "i want people to see the truth," he said.

He dwelled on the abundance of the disclosure: "its open diplomacy … its Climategate with a global scope and breathtaking depth … its beautiful and horrifying … It's public data, it belongs in the public domain." At one point, Bradass87 caught himself and said: "i can't believe what im confessing to you." It was too late. Unknown to him, two days into their exchange, on 23 May, Lamo had contacted the US military. On 25 May he met officers from the Pentagon's criminal investigations department in a Starbucks and gave them a printout of Bradass87's online chat.

On 26 May, at US Forward Operating Base Hammer, 25 miles outside Baghdad, a 22-year-old intelligence analyst named Bradley Manning was arrested, shipped across the border to Kuwait and locked up in a military prison.

News of the arrest leaked out slowly, primarily through Wired News, whose senior editor, Kevin Poulsen, is a friend of Lamo's and who published edited extracts from Bradass87's chatlogs. Pressure started to build on Assange: the Pentagon said formally that it would like to find him; Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers, said he thought Assange could be in some physical danger; Ellsberg and two other former whistleblowers warned that US agencies would "do all possible to make an example" of the Wikileaks founder. Assange cancelled a planned trip to Las Vegas and went to ground.

After several days trying to make contact through intermediaries, the Guardian finally caught up with Assange in a café in Brussels where he had surfaced to speak at the European parliament.

Assange volunteered that Wikileaks was in possession of several million files, which amounted to an untold history of American government activity around the world, disclosing numerous important and controversial activities. They were putting the finishing touches to an accessible version of the data which they were preparing to post immediately on the internet in order to pre-empt any attempt to censor it.

But he also feared that the significance of the logs and some of the important stories buried in them might be missed if they were simply dumped raw on to the web. Instead he agreed that a small team of specialist reporters from the Guardian could have access to the logs for a few weeks before Wikileaks published, to decode them and establish what they revealed about the conduct of the war.

To reduce the risk of gagging by the authorities, the database would also be made available to the New York Times and the German weekly, Der Spiegel which, along with the Guardian, would publish simultaneously in three different jurisdictions. Under the arrangement, Assange would have no influence on the stories we wrote, but would have a voice in the timing of publication.

He would place the first tranche of data in encrypted form on a secret website and the Guardian would access it with a user name and password constructed from the commercial logo on the cafe's napkin.

Today's stories are based on that batch of logs. Wikileaks has simultaneously published much of the raw data. It says it has been careful to weed out material which could jeopardise human sources.

Since the release of the Apache helicopter video, there has been some evidence of low-level attempts to smear Wikileaks. Online stories accuse Assange of spending Wikileaks money on expensive hotels (at a follow-up meeting in Stockholm, he slept on an office floor); of selling data to mainstream media (the subject of money was never mentioned); or charging for media interviews (also never mentioned).

Earlier this year, Wikileaks published a US military document which disclosed a plan to "destroy the centre of gravity" of Wikileaks by attacking its trustworthiness.

Meanwhile, somewhere in Kuwait, Manning has been charged under US miitary law with improperly downloading and releasing information, including the Icelandic cable and the video of Apache helicopters shooting civilians in Baghdad. He faces trial by court martial with the promise of a heavy jail sentence.

Ellsberg has described Manning as "a new hero of mine". In his online chat, Bradass87 looked into the future: "god knows what happens now … hopefully, worldwide discussion, debates and reforms. if not … we're doomed."

Afghanistan war logs: Story behind biggest leak in intelligence history | World news | The Guardian
 
Back
Top Bottom