Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I still have to understand the threat of Dirty bomb shown in many news channels about allegedly a terrorist carrying Nuclear fissile material in his back pack and exploding it in city center...and guess what people beleived it spossible.
WOnt the "Rug sack" terrorist be killed or disoriented almost immediately by the Radiation?
Secondly how easy is it to actually build a nuclear bomb in one's garden shed?
If it was that easy,many people had done it to blow up their "Ex girl friend's" house and leave a huge Crater there.
Its not Muslim countries who are promoting terrorism..It the so called Elite peaceful world who are portraying Terrorists as Super humans with genius of a dozen Nobel prize winners.
A dirty bomb derives its damage from radioactive contamination which can last thousands of years depending on the material chosen.
This does not matter to a suicide bomber, now does it? Further, delayed contamination can be easily arranged with dispersants or timed explosions.
It is not as difficult as one would imagine, providing the raw materials are available, the most difficult to obtain being the fissile materials.
A postgraduate university student was able to design a complete portable weapon as his graduating thesis a few decades ago from public sources, which was later classified and all information suppressed.
These words are mere definitions that change depending on which side of the fence the sayey lives on, that is all.
But cant be rejected all together..
Carrying Radioactive matter close to one's spine in a rug sack wont damage Nervous system to the level of disabling the Mr terrorist before they can do anything?
Thousands of years ? are you sure...Why you think the most contaminated area on the planet Chernobyl is full of life..and there are no two headed zombies roaming there..Nuclear threat is over rated.
In public, both sides have described putting American boots on the ground as a red line issue.
However, a cable sent by the then US Ambassador to Islamabad, Anne Patterson, states that Pakistan has twice requested American soldiers to embed with its Frontier Corps in North Waziristan and South Waziristan, areas dotted with Taliban and al-Qaeda bases.
On both occasions Pakistan asked for the help of US special forces to provide intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance – including video footage from drones – to its troops. On one mission they helped the Pakistani soldiers target an enemy base with artillery.
"These deployments are highly politically sensitive because of widely-held concerns among the public about Pakistani sovereignty and opposition to allowing foreign military forces to operate in any fashion on Pakistani soil," she wrote.
"Should these developments and/or related matters receive any coverage in the Pakistani or US media, the Pakistani military will likely stop making requests for such assistance."
A second cable describes a 2008 meeting with Syed Yousaf Raza Gilani, Pakistani prime minister, in which he brushes aside concerns about the use of Predator drones against targets in the tribal areas and gives an insight into how he would deny any co-operation.
"I don't care if they do it as long as they get the right people. We'll protest in the National Assembly and then ignore it," he told Ms Patterson.
There have been more than 100 drone strikes so far this year as the Obama administration steps up its covert use of Predators in the skies over Pakistan.
Publicly, Pakistan has insisted the strikes are "unhelpful" while America has refused to confirm the existence of the CIA programme, despite the visibility of strikes.
The secrecy has spawned a generation of conspiracy theorists and provided the local media with countless stories of CIA plots, US border incursions and Blackwater operatives at large.
Hasan Askari Rizvi, a Pakistani analyst, said the latest revelations would be deeply damaging to a government which lacked the strength to articulate its true relationship with Washington, for fear of angering the country's hardliners.
"There is no doubt this will fuel anti-Americanism and will encourage the Islamists and the conspiracy theorists," he said.
how come there are no leaks for isreal
how come there are no leaks for uk
how come there are no leaks against australia
how come there are no leaks for EU
wikkileaks admits that they havent gave out leaks against british royal family WHY?? just to miantain their relation with UK ??? or it was not authorized by penta----gone????
i hope someone can answer these questions......