What's new

Why is there a statue of Ranjit Singh in Lahore?

You can't and won't understand this because your just a d*ck with no brain. If you had a brain you would know this was done with a eye on politics intended to curry favour with Sikhs in India. That statue is just one little help in the effort to push the Khalistan project into reality. That frankly is worth a few dumb Lahori's being offended.

Think big. You live in a big city. Not a village in South Punjab.
Pardon his bhayyaness. He can't help it.
By the by,,, other thn 'tyrant Ranjit ' ,Pak bhayyas have nothing to show for thr so called martialness other thn thr eternal enthusiasm for bootpolishing invaders.
Similarly in history,,, Indus valley,,,,,, ironically both are unislamic :D
Pak bhayyes-lesser sons of greater "jahillyah" Sires. :lol:
Ps- another funny observation,,,,outrage about statue is more from bhagora bhayyas,,, UK, USA bhaage huye inn bhayyo ko dekho (they don't even conform with the values this coutries stand for/or hate thm)...
Lekin do dollar ke liye ghairat bech ke wahi kha rhe hai.
The likes of @AUz , who don't have the aukaat to make an honest living on thr own Islamic mother land,, talk big on internet while living in USA, despite hating the US ethos and knowing the truth.
The same country which has literally destroyed Pakistan since it's inception.
Yeh hoti hai bhayyo ki aukaat.
And thn ths same people wonder why they have bad 'hukmarans'. When they themselve sell thr ghairat for 2 dollars more,, wht can hukmaran do, when he gets 100 dollar.
Even babar, the conqueror, understood thr character.
 
Last edited:
.
Statues should never be destroyed, if the statue is of a person who the normal public dislikes, then the statue should be removed and moved into a museum. It still is art.
As for the statue of Columbus, who told you that the EU or US "Government" is actively removing it? The matter is under consideration and the general public wants it taken down. Again, if the public isn't happy with it, it should be taken down.
My problem is only with DESTROYING the statue, like the arm of Ranjit Singh's statue was destroyed, art like this should not be destroyed outright.
 
.
Pardon his bhayyaness. He can't help it.
By the by,,, other thn 'tyrant Ranjit ' ,Pak bhayyas have nothing to show for thr so called martialness other thn thr eternal enthusiasm for bootpolishing invaders.
Similarly in history,,, Indus valley,,,,,, ironically both are unislamic :D
Pak bhayyes-lesser sons of greater "jahillyah" Sires. :lol:
Ps- another funny observation,,,,outrage about statue is more from bhagora bhayyas,,, UK, USA bhaage huye inn bhayyo ko dekho (they don't even conform with the values this coutries stand for/or hate thm)...
Lekin do dollar ke liye ghairat bech ke wahi kha rhe hai.
The likes of @AUz , who don't have the aukaat to make an honest living on thr own Islamic mother land,, talk big on internet while living in USA, despite hating the US ethos and knowing the truth.
The same country which has literally destroyed Pakistan since it's inception.
Yeh hoti hai bhayyo ki aukaat.
And thn ths same people wonder why they have bad 'hukmarans'. When they themselve sell thr ghairat for 2 dollars more,, wht can hukmaran do, when he gets 100 dollar.
Even babar, the conqueror, understood thr character.

Hi,

You should write and express yourself clearly so that the reader can understand what you want to say.

Now what happens when you are about 1/3 the way from the destination of the invader for thousands of years---the result you see is punjab.

When the invaders reached punjab on their way to conquer hindustan's rajas and Maharajas and the kingdom of dehli---they were at the peak of their force projection and power.
 
.
Sikhs, Rajputs, they escaped from central/west Asia and settled around Punjab & adjoining regions.

hindus who couldn’t defeat them,gave them the title of rulers and used them as protectors.

If these suckers were any good they wouldn’t have been dislodged & chased out of central/west Asia.

Nothing but a bunch of no bodies, only good against south Asians, you put them against some real men, men who live to fight & kill the results are for all to see.

The only ruler of India who got kicked out of central Asia was Babur/mughals. Even at their height of power Mughals launched several attempts to conquer their fathelands in central Asia, got their a$$ handed to them every time.
 
.
Pardon his bhayyaness. He can't help it.
By the by,,, other thn 'tyrant Ranjit ' ,Pak bhayyas have nothing to show for thr so called martialness other thn thr eternal enthusiasm for bootpolishing invaders.
Similarly in history,,, Indus valley,,,,,, ironically both are unislamic :D
Pak bhayyes-lesser sons of greater "jahillyah" Sires. :lol:
Ps- another funny observation,,,,outrage about statue is more from bhagora bhayyas,,, UK, USA bhaage huye inn bhayyo ko dekho (they don't even conform with the values this coutries stand for/or hate thm)...
Lekin do dollar ke liye ghairat bech ke wahi kha rhe hai.
The likes of @AUz , who don't have the aukaat to make an honest living on thr own Islamic mother land,, talk big on internet while living in USA, despite hating the US ethos and knowing the truth.
The same country which has literally destroyed Pakistan since it's inception.
Yeh hoti hai bhayyo ki aukaat.
And thn ths same people wonder why they have bad 'hukmarans'. When they themselve sell thr ghairat for 2 dollars more,, wht can hukmaran do, when he gets 100 dollar.
Even babar, the conqueror, understood thr character.
Dunno wtf you're saying. Just stay away from the Indus Valley Civilisation. It isn't yours. It's ours. Be at peace with that. Whether we're what you call "bhayyas" or something else, the IVC is ours. Please ask your countrymen to desist from considering the IVC as some precursor to the nation of Hindustan. It wasn't. Remove it from your history books as it isn't your history.
 
.
The only ruler of India who got kicked out of central Asia was Babur/mughals. Even at their height of power Mughals launched several attempts to conquer their fathelands in central Asia, got their a$$ handed to them every time.

They trampled all over India, no one could stop them, before that your rajputs were put to the sword, all in a days work I guess.
 
.
Hi,

You should write and express yourself clearly so that the reader can understand what you want to say.

Now what happens when you are about 1/3 the way from the destination of the invader for thousands of years---the result you see is punjab.

When the invaders reached punjab on their way to conquer hindustan's rajas and Maharajas and the kingdom of dehli---they were at the peak of their force projection and power.
Sir, it is for the 2ruppaya people who talk big anonymously on internet.
N i guarantee u tht they get it. :D
BTW what I say is the truth.
I have no hatred or despise for the people per say (or for anyone of tht region) but for thr culture n ethos.
How can one call himself martial whn his history has nothing but relentless servitude spanning milleiums.
How can one call himself ghairatmand/momin whn,even after not conforming with the ethos of the country he willingly lived in(n hating it) for money.
N thn turn around n talk big anonymously on internet.
 
.
A little explanation with that Wikipedia link would've been helpful as to why you want me to read it. I get your point that this statue removal has happened in US and European countries as well, so what?
Besides, in those countries the vandalized statues represent something completely different.
Our case and their case is NOT the same. Removing Sikh monuments like this will have negative consequences on our nation's stances on many matters like religious tolerance, our relations with Sikhs and general extremism. The statues in US were removed after George Flyod was murdered and those statues were representing racism, why out of no where Ranjit Singh's statue was vandalized now? And why people like you have started supporting such incidences?
All of this has been preached by Mr. Rizvi, 370 and 35A were scraped and the statue was vandalized, why? What part was played by Ranjit Singh's statue in what India did?

For me, this statue was made by a local artist and is ART, ART SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED.
 
.
Dunno wtf you're saying. Just stay away from the Indus Valley Civilisation. It isn't yours. It's ours. Be at peace with that. Whether we're what you call "bhayyas" or something else, the IVC is ours. Please ask your countrymen to desist from considering the IVC as some precursor to the nation of Hindustan. It wasn't. Remove it from your history books as it isn't your history.
Keep calm n continue being a bhayya. :D
We have our own history n identity written in our buronjis.
We got nothing to do with u or ur thuka hua shameful history.

We r not clueless bhayyas with identity crisis like u.

We r what we r,,, dumb ,proud n tribal.
 
Last edited:
.
Sir, it is for the 2ruppaya people who talk big anonymously on internet.
N i guarantee u tht they get it. :D
BTW what I say is the truth.
I have no hatred or despise for the people per say (or for anyone of tht region) but for thr culture n ethos.
How can one call himself martial whn his history has nothing but relentless servitude spanning milleiums.
How can one call himself ghairatmand/momin whn,even after not conforming with the ethos of the country he willingly lived in(n hating it) for money.
N thn turn around n talk big anonymously on internet.

Hi,

Well---look at the history of punjab---one invader after the other coming thru---.

The invaders have built up strength to conquer Dehli sultanate---.

Punjab is an OUTPOST---getting smashed by each invader---war war war & war---.

What that has created is a defensive mindset of the punjabis---. They have been busy protecting their soil from the invaders---.

And that is why pakistani Punjabi / sindhi / baluchi generals are genetically of defensive mindset---.

And interestingly you see a non punjabi general Musharraf having invasion mindset---.

Ranjit Singh was the first Punjabi to go outside of punjab and make his conquests---and make his mark.

But OTOH---when Gen Raheel had a carte blanche for conquest---he balked---chickened out---.
 
Last edited:
.
The objection around Ranjit Singh's crimes is hypocritical. Muslim conquerors killed as many if not more Punjabis but are venerated.

The fact is RS is a genuine son of the Punjab soil, his blood probably runs in many Muslim Pakistani veins today. Punjabi Sikhs came from the same households that Punjabi Muslims sprang from, I don't see any harm in celebrating a Sikh brother from the same fold.
 
.
Sikhs, Rajputs, they escaped from central/west Asia and settled around Punjab & adjoining regions.

hindus who couldn’t defeat them,gave them the title of rulers and used them as protectors.

If these suckers were any good they wouldn’t have been dislodged & chased out of central/west Asia.

Nothing but a bunch of no bodies, only good against south Asians, you put them against some real men, men who live to fight & kill the results are for all to see.
Sikh and Rajputs came from central Asia you fool? And what were they before becoming Hindus? And about that real men thing, don't show us your fake bravado, we have seen it many times before and we are not impressed.
 
.
Sikh and Rajputs came from central Asia you fool? And what were they before becoming Hindus? And about that real men thing, don't show us your fake bravado, we have seen it many times before and we are not impressed.

yes they did, so did huns, Gujjar as, kushans & so on.
 
. .
So who do you think your ancestors were, where did they come from?

My ancestors are my name, they always been around Baluchistan & Afghanistan, even made it to Hindustan and ruled them too.

Killed a coward called prithvi & his cowering rajputs & opened the doors for all to shaft the Hindus and anyone else that wanted some.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom