Why is the southern part of South Asia more developed than the northern part of South Asia

[Azizam]

Srilanka is nowhere close to South India.

Care to explain why?

 

[Shahmir]

And you are not inferior?

For indians , we are superiors , hail us Mr. Inferior

 

[Chronos]

This thread is pure non-sense.

The fact that Southern part of India is more developed, is marginal.

Oh and us Southies need to look at more of a higher benchmark than Pakistan and North India.

That's the equivalent of beating contestants in the Paralympics when you are an able bodied person.

If you look at the economic indicators, Southern India still needs way more work.

And the four Southern states keep electing criminal politicians and is no way behind in corruption.

2G scam done by Karunanidhi's son. Bellary mining scam. Etc.

So what's this pride about, beating Pakistan? Beating North India? Pretty much every country in the world, excpet sub-saharan Africa has done this.

You are Butt gypsy, Dogra Rajputs are your superiors.

Stop replying to him dude. Trolls always win, because they levae inflammatory posts think nothing of it, while those who take the bait, lose time over it

 

[Shahmir]

You are Butt gypsy, Dogra Rajputs are your superiors.

Mr. Inferior Jinbhut, I already told you these surnames have no importance for me, you are wasting your time by bringing that BS again and again

 

[Chronos]

Come to South India and see for yourself. South India is more developed than north in terms of human development. In fact if human development in north was similar to south, India would have been similar to Sri Lanka in terms of human development.

That's a bit of an embellishment,

And to Sri Lankan's credit, they have done a lot of work in this regard.

Plus culture counts.

Punjab which is in north india has always been best state. southern states like kerala have higher percentage of literate people but aint high in standard of living

Chandigarh is the wealthiest part in India.

So the topic is non-sense.

@A Town :

It is true that the main reason that BD is backyard is because of its late start.

Look at Vietnam and how it is so far backyards compared to South Korea and Taiwan. They had decades extra to develop while Vietnam was at war with France and then US.

If you look at the progress that BD is making now, only Sri Lanka can match that in South Asia.

Don't you mean backwards? And yes BD has been making progress in the Human development front

we have a pretty decent airport..bus stops and recently built elevated roads..even villages have good paved roads...rarely will you find potholes on highways..lots of cars on roads..what else

I know that Chandigarh is shared between Haryana and Punjab but still, the best art of India.

 

[FNFAL]

simple...haven't you seen the almonds sitting at the bottom of the almond shake?

 

[Azizam]

I ask again, what happened to Krrish Square project? I am waiting for it to start badly. I don't seen any news related to it anymore.

Krrish Square - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[UKBengali]

True, but same can be said of India. From 1947 up to the 90s, India had very slow growth due to the socialist policies of Nehru. But when India liberalized it's economy in 1991, India began to grow. So had India liberalized it's economy in 1947, today India would have been a developed country.

That is not a valid argument in contrast to BD only having since 1971 to develop.

India had control of its own destiny since 1947 and freely chose to follow certain policies that were not conducive to economic growth. BD had to wait till 1971 till it had control of its own destiny.

I disagree that India would have been developed if it followed free-market economics from 1947 - more likely to be like Thailand or maybe Malaysia at best now. Still India could have been as rich as US now.

In terms of raising living standards of its population it is Sri Lanka and BD that are now leading the way. India and Pakistan are lagging.

 

[PARAS]

Inferiors want to equate with pakistan at any cost, china is also in the so-called "north" why not bother to invoke china, why so much fettish about pakistan

Had the laugh of my life . Don't crack such jokes ever again. I may choke by laughing so hard
china is not in south asia

 

[Shahmir]

Had the laugh of my life . Don't crack such jokes ever again. I may choke by laughing so hard

Here comes another inferior who lives in the fantasy world where india is "super power" , you inferior indians need to wake up and face the reality , and the reality is that india is only "super power" of AIDS affectees and most malnourished population of the world.

 

[PARAS]

Here comes another inferior who lives in the fantasy world where india is "super power" , you inferior indians need to wake up and face the reality , and the reality is that india is only "super power" of AIDS affectees and most malnourished population of the world.

Lol so you think because India is not a super power,its inferior to pakistan. Pakistani madarssa logic at work here!
No one said India is superpower ! Its a third world country-accepted!! But even then its thousands of times better than pakistan at everything from cricket to land area . Only thing at which you guys are no.1 is ter*orism .

 

[Foot12]

Care to explain why?

Care to explain why?

Sri Lanka was lucky that it was never under Turkic rule during the medieval period.
Its thanks to the medieval south Indian warriors, who defeated the Turkic invaders in southern India, that Sri Lanka
was never under Turkic or Mughal rule. Otherwise Sri Lanka would probably be as poor as Afghanistan or Pakistan.

 

[Azizam]

Sri Lanka was lucky that it was never under Turkic rule during the medieval period.
Its thanks to the medieval south Indian warriors, who defeated the Turkic invaders in southern India, that Sri Lanka
was never under Turkic or Mughal rule. Otherwise Sri Lanka would probably be as poor as Afghanistan or Pakistan.

Turkic invaders didn't have a superior navy at that time and Medieval Sri Lanka was also relatively powerful enough to challenge Chinese hegemony in the days of Qing dynasty .

 

[Gibbs]

Sri Lanka was lucky that it was never under Turkic rule during the medieval period.
Its thanks to the medieval south Indian warriors, who defeated the Turkic invaders in southern India, that Sri Lanka
was never under Turkic or Mughal rule. Otherwise Sri Lanka would probably be as poor as Afghanistan or Pakistan.

What ??!!??..

 

[Foot12]

Turkic invaders didn't have a superior navy at that time and Medieval Sri Lanka was also relatively powerful enough to challenge Chinese hegemony in the days of Qing dynasty .

It was because of the Vijayanagara Empire and Maratha Empire that Sri Lanka never came under Turkic or Mughal rule.