What's new

Why is China opening so many fronts ?

no we are not currently in an open hostility, but we're moving there, eventually.
since our last January standoff, much has changed in regard to our foreign policy regarding the south china sea and china herself, the last time I read, we reject beijing's offer for talks.and filed official complain to the UN.

you clearly don't know that Indonesia doesn't want escalate further either, just like US/CANADA/MEXICO disputes, there are plenty of back channels, things get traded off behind the public, that are happening that you are not aware of.
 
you clearly don't know that Indonesia doesn't want escalate further either, just like US/CANADA/MEXICO disputes, there are plenty of back channels, things get traded off behind the public, that are happening that you are not aware of.
When did I mention Indonesia wants to escalate? The whole point is indonesia is on its way to be part of a growing list of countries in a disputes with china.
 
Indonesia, Mongolia can be crossed off, they have no issues with china. Taiwan is not a country and is recognized by India and rest of the world as part of China. So that leaves very few on your list, so no, not even close.
No. You are speaking nonsense. They do have issues.

But here is the thing. Out of these nations, India is the one that is the weakest.

It will perhaps be in your interest to run over India and show your strength ...
 
No. You are speaking nonsense. They do have issues.

But here is the thing. Out of these nations, India is the one that is the weakest.

It will perhaps be in your interest to run over India and show your strength ...

actually India is the strongest. And India is the only out of 14 chinese land neighbors that have land disputes, all other disputes china have are maritime disputes.

When did I mention Indonesia wants to escalate? The whole point is indonesia is on its way to be part of a growing list of countries in a disputes with china.

Indoneisa had disputes with other countries, not just china, in South China Sea since WWII, what you mean growing list. The list never changed. South China Sea disputes existed since WWII between china and other countries, as well as between ASEAN countries themselves.
 
actually India is the strongest. And India is the only out of 14 chinese land neighbors that have land disputes, all other disputes china have are maritime disputes.



Indoneisa had disputes with other countries, not just china, in South China Sea since WWII, what you mean growing list. The list never changed. South China Sea disputes existed since WWII between china and other countries, as well as between ASEAN countries themselves.

lol @ this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesian_invasion_of_East_Timor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligitan_and_Sipadan_dispute

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austr...ever, broken,overlapping claims to the seabed.

indoensia can keep carrying on the holy facade
 
You don't have a propaganda mouthpiece? What about that ugly pig Arnab Goswami and that red light specimen Palki from WION?
They're as much as propaganda mouthpiece as NYT is an American propaganda mouthpiece. They are news Channels has zero connections with the government.
 
Look it here guys this is what I like to call an example in prime retardation.

This is what is called a false equivalence fallacy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fal...e is a logical,"comparing apples and oranges".

Indonesian border dispute cannot be compared with Chinese one because unlike china we don't antagonizes & actually open to ACTUAL diplomacy & negotiation.

Here's an example:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-27535004
 
actually India is the strongest. And India is the only out of 14 chinese land neighbors that have land disputes, all other disputes china have are maritime disputes.
India is the strongest?

Are you out of your mind?

@PAKISTANFOREVER

Seriously, he must be an Indian.

India is perhaps weaker than Mongolia even.
 
Look it here guys this is what I like to call an example in prime retardation.

This is what is called a false equivalence fallacy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence#:~:text=False equivalence is a logical,"comparing apples and oranges".

Indonesian border dispute cannot be compared with Chinese one because unlike china we don't antagonizes & actually open to ACTUAL diplomacy & negotiation.

Here's an example:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-27535004

Look it here guys this is what I like to call an example in prime retardation.

This is what is called a false equivalence fallacy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence#:~:text=False equivalence is a logical,"comparing apples and oranges".

Indonesian border dispute cannot be compared with Chinese one because unlike china we don't antagonizes & actually open to ACTUAL diplomacy & negotiation.

Here's an example:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-27535004
Indonesia = no saint herself. Can only eat smaller fish, but end up eaten by bigger fish herself Hahhaha.

Sometimes comments r so retarded themselves n evasive instead I'm lazy to reply, beyond this.
 
Indonesia = no saint herself. Can only eat smaller fish, but end up eaten by bigger fish herself Hahhaha.

Sometimes comments r so retarded themselves n evasive instead I'm lazy to reply, beyond this.
Compared to China we are Jesus.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom