Why India no longer cares about Pakistan's nuclear threats

[MultaniGuy]

Pakistan army did not surrender to Bangladesh army, It surrendered to Indian army. Jinnah did not create Pakistan, Jinnah asked for Pakistan and British gave it to him.

India kills Pakistani troops with equal ease. It is just that India has been staying within its borders lately, when India crosses its border into Pakistan, we all know what happens, Pakistan commits largest after world war 2.

Don't be an idiot. Jinnah created Pakistan. British just said okay to it.

Pakistan army did not surrender to Bangladesh army, It surrendered to Indian army. Jinnah did not create Pakistan, Jinnah asked for Pakistan and British gave it to him.

India kills Pakistani troops with equal ease. It is just that India has been staying within its borders lately, when India crosses its border into Pakistan, we all know what happens, Pakistan commits largest after world war 2.

Besides that "Republic of India" is an artificial entity that was created in 1947. India is not South Asia.

Nor can India claim all of South Asia's history and culture.

 

[Osiris]

It were the Muslims of the British Raj that demanded for Pakistan.

lol we Muslims got land, India lost land during the partition that India will never get back.

That might be, but it is not an achievement of Republic of Pakistan. What are Republic of Pakistan's achievement against Republic of India in last 69 years ?

 

[MultaniGuy]

And so what? The Muslims of Pre-Pakistan broke up the British Raj.

That is quite an accomplishment in my view.

 

[Osiris]

Don't be an idiot. Jinnah created Pakistan. British just said okay to it.


Besides that "Republic of India" is an artificial entity that was created in 1947. India is not South Asia.

Nor can India claim all of South Asia's history and culture.

How did Jinnah create Pakistan, was he in power in England, was he a general who defeated British troops and carved Pakistan for himself ?

Jinnah simply asked for Pakistan, it was up to British to give to him or not.

India is a far more natural entity than 'Pakistan'. A world did not even a few decades ago.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Pakistan army did not surrender to Bangladesh army, It surrendered to Indian army. Jinnah did not create Pakistan, Jinnah asked for Pakistan and British gave it to him.

India kills Pakistani troops with equal ease. It is just that India has been staying within its borders lately, when India crosses its border into Pakistan, we all know what happens, Pakistan commits largest after world war 2.

So then ghandi did not create india. The British did. What is surrender ultimately? Making sure 50,000 men of your country survive or losing over 30% of your territory as a result of various conquests spanning a 1000 years?

Please stop fantasizing and come and try. All you mutter is meaningless conjecture. Apart from the net, india cannot fight Pakistan anymore. In 1971 yes but not now. If india does then come and talk. Otherwise everything you say means nothing. Come back & talk when india manages to gain the ability to fight Pakistan.

 

[MultaniGuy]

How did Jinnah create Pakistan, was he in power in England, was he a general who defeated British troops and carved Pakistan for himself ?

Jinnah simply asked for Pakistan, it was up to British to give to him or not.

India is a far more natural entity than 'Pakistan'. A world did not even a few decades ago.

LOL don't make me laugh. All countries have a history. Pakistan is more of a natural state than the Republic of India is. Pakistan has the Indus River valley Civilization to boast about. Can India boast about that. No, India cannot.

Jinnah is credited with founding of Pakistan. Jinnah fought for Pakistan, the British didn't give Pakistan on a silver platter you know.

How did Jinnah create Pakistan, was he in power in England, was he a general who defeated British troops and carved Pakistan for himself ?

Jinnah simply asked for Pakistan, it was up to British to give to him or not.

India is a far more natural entity than 'Pakistan'. A world did not even a few decades ago.

The same argument can be said for the "Republic of India" that was created in 1947, The British created it or was it Ghandi? Time to be honest now! but from a duplicitous Indian like yourself I don't know if I will see an answer from you.

 

[Osiris]

So then ghandi did not create india. The British did. What is surrender ultimately? Making sure 50,000 men of your country survive or losing over 30% of your territory as a result of various conquests spanning a 1000 years?

Please stop fantasizing and come and try. All you mutter is meaningless conjecture. Apart from the net, india cannot fight Pakistan anymore. In 1971 yes but not now. If india does then come and talk. Otherwise everything you say means nothing. Come back & talk when india manages to gain the ability to fight Pakistan.

How can Mahtma Gandhi create India..India already existed though under British rule. What M.K Gandhi did was to hasten the end of British rule in India.

1971 was the biggest defeat of Islamic Republic of Pakistan to Republic of India(which also happens to be the largest surrender till date after world war 2) but by no means it was the only one.

India took Siachen, Pakistan could do nothing. India took 140 peaks Kargil back, again Pakistan could do nothing.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

How can Mahtma Gandhi create India..India already existed though under British rule. What M.K Gandhi did was to hasten the end of British rule in India.

1971 was the biggest defeat of Islamic Republic of Pakistan to Republic of India(which also happens to be the largest surrender till date after world war 2) but by no means it was the only one.

India took Siachen, Pakistan could do nothing. India took 140 peaks Kargil back, again Pakistan could do nothing.

So you admit, that india is a British invention. Pakistan was created as a safe space for a unique race of people with a unique way of life that is very old. bengalis are not a part of that race so they don't matter to us.

Could you provide credible links to your claims which are obviously not indian. You are begining to sound like those indians who claim that they invented flying cars and spaceships more than 5000 years ago.

So when is india going to take back the land that is Pakistan and bangladesh which was forcefully taken away from it? If the answer is never then there is no point continuing this conversation.

 

[MultaniGuy]

How can Mahtma Gandhi create India..India already existed though under British rule. What M.K Gandhi did was to hasten the end of British rule in India.

1971 was the biggest defeat of Islamic Republic of Pakistan to Republic of India(which also happens to be the largest surrender till date after world war 2) but by no means it was the only one.

India took Siachen, Pakistan could do nothing. India took 140 peaks Kargil back, again Pakistan could do nothing.

No India did not exist under British Rule. South Asia which is the more correct term, was a bunch of princely states. Secondly even Myanmar was part of the British Raj. Modern day India has nothing to do with Pakistan or Myanmar.

How can Mahtma Gandhi create India..India already existed though under British rule. What M.K Gandhi did was to hasten the end of British rule in India.

1971 was the biggest defeat of Islamic Republic of Pakistan to Republic of India(which also happens to be the largest surrender till date after world war 2) but by no means it was the only one.

India took Siachen, Pakistan could do nothing. India took 140 peaks Kargil back, again Pakistan could do nothing.

Actually you are wrong, Pakistan took peak 5353 from India. lol India never took peaks from Pakistani control. lol.


http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/near-tiger-hill-point-5353-still-pakoccupied/488505/

 

[Osiris]

No India did not exist under British Rule. South Asia which is the more correct term, was a bunch of princely states. Secondly even Myanmar was part of the British Raj. Modern day India has nothing to do with Pakistan or Myanmar.

Offcourse it did, It was called British India wasnt it. When Alexander first set out to conquer, he set out to conquer India and not Pakistan or Burma(even though he was only able conquer parts of present day Pakistan. Even then this land was known as India.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Offcourse it did, It was called British India wasnt it. When Alexander first set out to conquer, he set out to conquer India and not Pakistan or Burma(even though he was only able conquer parts of present day Pakistan. Even then this land was known as India.

Evidence please that it was called india.

 

[faithfulguy]

How can Mahtma Gandhi create India..India already existed though under British rule. What M.K Gandhi did was to hasten the end of British rule in India.

1971 was the biggest defeat of Islamic Republic of Pakistan to Republic of India(which also happens to be the largest surrender till date after world war 2) but by no means it was the only one.

India took Siachen, Pakistan could do nothing. India took 140 peaks Kargil back, again Pakistan could do nothing.

India as a geographical exp4ession existed. But India the nation, the political entity, was created in 1947. The same time as Pakistan. India brain wash its people by confusing the term “India”

 

[Osiris]

Actually you are wrong, Pakistan took peak 5353 from India. lol India never took peaks from Pakistani control. lol.


http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/near-tiger-hill-point-5353-still-pakoccupied/488505/

So Pakistan lost 139 other peaks to Indian counterattack in addition to Siachen and East Pakistan. How is that not a series of defeats?

Evidence please that it was called india.

https://www.ancient.eu/article/203/etymology-of-the-name-india/

World Map of Herodotus(5th century BC)

 

[MultaniGuy]

So Pakistan lost 139 other peaks to Indian counterattack in addition to Siachen and East Pakistan. How is that not a series of defeats?



https://www.ancient.eu/article/203/etymology-of-the-name-india/

World Map of Herodotus(5th century BC)

You are confusing "India" as a political term and a geographical term.

"India" used to be a geographical term, but now is the political name of the "Republic of India."

Stop being an idiot. Pakistanis were never "Indians" of the "republic of India." Pakistan got its independence from Britain.

Offcourse it did, It was called British India wasnt it. When Alexander first set out to conquer, he set out to conquer India and not Pakistan or Burma(even though he was only able conquer parts of present day Pakistan. Even then this land was known as India.

They used "India" as a geographical term and not as political term you dolt.

"Republic of India" cannot claim all of South Asia's history.

 

[Osiris]

You are confusing "India" as a political term and a geographical term.

"India" used to be a geographical term, but now is the political name of the "Republic of India."

Stop being an idiot. Pakistanis were never "Indians" of the "republic of India." Pakistan got its independence from Britain.


They used "India" as a geographical term and not as political term you dolt.

"Republic of India" cannot claim all of South Asia's history.

There were no Pakistanis before 14th August 1947. They were all know as Indians only.