Why Hindu community leaving pakistan?

[RazPaK]

LOL. Just saw on Samaa tv. Six Hindus are going to India. They said they are going for Yatra and will be going with their Pakistani flags in hand.

 

[truthseer]

Kinko samjha raha hai dost. Ye pakistani wo kaum hai jo 2 nation theory ko prove karne ke liye kisi bhi level tak jaa sakte hain even tough the whole theory failed in 1971. Do watch hassan nissar who shows them mirror still they wanna live in denial, ignorant,arrogant, etc etc mode. So leave putting effort.

I'll correct you here. If the theory had failed in 1971, Bangladesh would have joined india

 

[KingMamba]

The Shiek I forget his name of Bangladesh did not want freedom he wanted autonomy. Indians took advantage and forced his hand.

 

[W.11]

Indian textbook don't spread hatred for Muslim. I studied in national board CBSE, we were taught about sufi movements, Barelvi-Deobandi movement, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan etc.

whatever is taught in clearly visible in this forum, there are more anti pakistan threads(anti pak sentiments) by indians then anti indian threads by pakistanis, also indians are very much obsessed about pakistan then pakistan are obsessed about indians, on this point you will agree

which has very much got to do with the hatred taught in the schools

 

[RazPaK]

whatever is taught in clearly visible in this forum, there are more anti pakistan threads(anti pak sentiments) by indians then anti indian threads by pakistanis, also indians are very much obsessed about pakistan then pakistan are obsessed about indians, on this point you will agree

which has very much got to do with the hatred taught in the schools

Not just schools. Their whole media is one big finely oiled propaganda machine.

 

[Neuro]

the quites without context can be very misleading

i dont really find anything of offence here, indian books must be quoting barbarian muslims who invaded india and ruled for centuries etc doesnt mean muslims at any time gonna object to that and try indians to chage that

its called pure history and how one translates that its upto him, i especially am saying that because i have actually heard this very thing from indian natgeo

before many muslims i-e our ancestors converted they were hindus and they were subjugated to caste system which is very horrible and extreme before they converted

No limits for fools like you .

 

[INDIC]

I'll correct you here. If the theory had failed in 1971, Bangladesh would have joined india

What about Bangladeshi illegal immigration, they separated from india, now pouring into India.

 

[joekrish]

Enjoying the suffering of your fellow Hindus only because they're in Pakistan and this gives you a point to use in debates is sickening

I was merely highlighting the fact that there are Pakistani Muslims also leaving in search of better opportunities though the Hindus are leaving for a different reason.

 

[INDIC]

whatever is taught in clearly visible in this forum, there are more anti pakistan threads(anti pak sentiments) by indians then anti indian threads by pakistanis, also indians are very much obsessed about pakistan then pakistan are obsessed about indians, on this point you will agree

which has very much got to do with the hatred taught in the schools

It is Pakistanis who drag us because most of you can't talk to us without abusing Hindus.

 

[truthseer]

It is Pakistanis who drag us because most of you can't talk to us without abusing Hindus.

Could you cite an example? And don't quote me, you know most of my posts are troll posts

 

[notsuperstitious]

I'll correct you here. If the theory had failed in 1971, Bangladesh would have joined india

The TNT promised a nation state where muslims of indian subcontinent would live happily together. If that meant a genocide, a civil war, thousands of murders and rapes and eventual creation of a new country, then yes, the TNT survived 1971.

Not to mention the almost equal no of Muslims in India as Pakistan or Bangladesh are still part of India. No civil war, despite the baggage of 1947 and history, despite the wars with an Islamic Pakistan, despite the tremebdous challenges of a poor country, despite the occassional friction and resurgence of Hindu fundamentalism.

Snake oil can be sold, can't be made to work.

BTW the TNT failed in the 1000 years prior to 1947, where hindus and muslims lived peacefully together despite the trolling by some foreign invaders.

 

[W.11]

Seriously, Spartacus, context? You've read the book, the book barely goes into details, it just states that in bullet points and goes on to give details about the Glorious Islamic empire

i have read the book but i dont remember any point you raised, so please find me a context, posting incomplete sentences which dont make senses without context

yes islamic empire was glorious, before that indian subcontinent was ruled by divided mahrajas and was a divided country, taj mehal was not a hindu temple as hindus try to claim but a muslim architecture etc

 

[WAR-rior]

I'll correct you here. If the theory had failed in 1971, Bangladesh would have joined india

No. you are wrong in understanding the theory itself. Its your misconception that India has expansionist intent and 'AKHAND BHARAT' means bringing all the subcontinent land under India.

1. 2 nation theory - Muslims and Hindus cant live together (dont know what were they doing for past 1000 years if thats da case. ) and hence 2 different nations has to be created ON BASIS OF RELIGION. (against the conventional thought that nations are created on basis of culture, language and political understanding rather than religion).

2. Akhand Bharat - All the different cultures and languages will live together under the umbrella called india like they have been before 1000 years during hindu and buddhist regime. It doesnt mean that Hindus will take over pakistan and kill all muslims. . This above thought is only and only result of schizophrenia which pakistan has been suffering past 70 years.

 

[W.11]

The TNT promised a nation state where muslims of indian subcontinent would live happily together. If that meant a genocide, a civil war, thousands of murders and rapes and eventual creation of a new country, then yes, the TNT survived 1971.

Not to mention the almost equal no of Muslims in India as Pakistan or Bangladesh are still part of India. No civil war, despite the baggage of 1947 and history, despite the wars with an Islamic Pakistan, despite the tremebdous challenges of a poor country, despite the occassional friction and resurgence of Hindu fundamentalism.

Snake oil can be sold, can''t be made to work.

does the ideology of hindustan meant to become the largest rape capital in the world, if yes then surely hindustan and ghandian ideology of hindustan survived

 

[truthseer]

No. you are wrong in understanding the theory itself. Its your misconception that India has expansionist intent and 'AKHAND BHARAT' means bringing all the subcontinent land under India.

1. 2 nation theory - Muslims and Hindus cant live together (dont know what were they doing for past 1000 years if thats da case. ) and hence 2 different nations has to be created ON BASIS OF RELIGION. (against the conventional thought that nations are created on basis of culture, language and political understanding rather than religion).

2. Akhand Bharat - All the different cultures and languages will live together under the umbrella called india like they have been before 1000 years during hindu and buddhist regime. It doesnt mean that Hindus will take over pakistan and kill all muslims. . This above thought is only and only result of schizophrenia which pakistan has been suffering past 70 years.

Where'd I mention Akhand Bharat? 2 nation theory basically states that Muslims and Hindus are two nations. It does not say they can't live together, those are lies which your textbooks may spout. To sum it up in Jinnah's words:

Hindus and Muslims are two different nations. They have their own culture, their own language. The hero of one is the foe of the other