Where? source? Right of Return is something that unconditional and enshrined into international law.
And once again, accepting the resolutions of UN is also an International Law, but you/Arabs have not accepted the State of Israel, and you are jumping directly to the right of return.
Buddy Armenia didn't even exist as a state until the very same "colonial powers"(Russians) collapsed and made way for successor states in the form of Azerbaijan and Armenia in the 1900s, only to be reabsorbed into the soviet union.
It is not about existing as a state, but it is about the Original Population of that area for thousands of years.
It didn't exist as a state due to the same problem of colonialism by Iran and Turks and then Russians.
Are you able to see the Double Standards:
- Arabs blame the colonial rule of British.
- Palestine also didn't exist as a state .
But still Arabs/Muslims deny existence of Israel, but at the same time consider Nagorno-Karabakh to be a part of Azerbaijan.
Wut? Soviets/Russian if anything were pro Armenia.
Russia may be pro-Armenian, but in the case of Nagorno-Karabakh, it used it for its own interests i.e. to keep good relations with Azerbaijan.
The fact does not change that the heavy majority of Nagorno-Karabakh were Armenians, and they didn't want to have anything with Azerbaijan, but still Russia kept the status-co. Thus, Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh started struggle against it too.
lol and yes, azeris and armenians did at one time live in a cohesive state harmoniously under the soviets. idk wtf that has to do with India or your example. it would be more like If I said at on time under British Rule people from different religions lived side by side in kashmir, which is also true. your analogy is flawed.
And I told you that use of power for brining temporary peace doesn't change the rights of the people. Armenian population were doing the armed struggle against Azerbaijan before the colonial Russains took them by force. And while such fake peace through the use of power was TEMPORARY, thus Armenians again started the struggle as soon as they got rid of USSR.
And all examples fit perfectly. Either it is peace in Kashmir under India where it is now try to settle more Hindus in Kashmir valley, or the example of British colonial power where Hindus and Muslims were living in peace in India. Or Chinese example under which Chinese and Uyghur lived in peace for decades. Or Serbian example where Serbs and Albanians lived in peace for decades under USSR.
You out here doing some weird *** grievance politics about stuff from before the modern era like literally 500 years ago.
You are now running from the original post. It were your Muslim buddies who brought that Yervan was Muslim majority 500 years ago, and then I have to show them multiple genocides by Turks and Iranians for centuries before they turned Yerevan to Muslim majority. But since it was an Armenian land for centuries, thus they returned there under Russian and there was no Muslim genocide.
Strange double standards you have. You keep on crying for the right to return for Palestinians, but when Armenians were returned to their land, then you have problems with it.
bringing all sorts of things into it, you started the conversation regarding nagorno karabakh, I i showed you the earliest available demographics survey of the region.
And I showed you how that happened through multiple genocides.
Hell, I showed you Turkey's genocide of Western Armenia in 1915, but still you are ok with it while your Muslim brothers did that genocide.
Yes, it was a genocide, after which no Armenians were left who could have asked for the right to that so-called return.
And all available demographics show that Armenians were in huge majority in 20th century. So, who is going in the past now? Yes, you are going now in the further past when Muslims became majority through genocides.
Why is it Halal for you to go in the past and use the example of Muslim demographics in that earlier centuries, but when we point out the real past of thousands of years of history with Armenian majority, then it becomes HARAM? What kind of double standards are they?