What's new

Why do Chinese pupils do so well in school tests?

People refused to accept that different race has different IQ because of their gene,but easily accept that different race has different height and such kind thing of blacks is stronger and have longer d!ck than Asians because their gene.One reason is having a low IQ is more a insult than a small d!ck,so it's considered as politically wrong.Another reason is that IQ is much more complicated than the length of dick or human height,so they can put the reason into many sh!t into it such as family value ,work ethnics and other sh!ts.
I mean obviously someone is cleverer than others and get higher scores than others even he don't study a lot and he lives in a poor family.If gene different can cause the different in different person,than it should and must cause the different IQ of different race due to different history and different surroundings that different group of people have go through.
In a short sentence,we are just born to be more cleverer.

Singaporean Chinese has world highest IQ and blacks have the lowest.

5a98a450ea0f5a2ea3ba843b6d3a17a8.png


Blacks have the longest cockk length while East Asian is generally shorter.

f6ccbbb813df0ec069c81e2b7dfe250b.png
 
View attachment 127076

Indian heritage kids includes kids from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. If it was Indian kids alone, they d be right up there with their Chinese counterparts.


This chart is bullshit!

Because it's all about the selective immigration, as Indian immigrants to Australia are WELL above Indian average due to Australia's strict point-based immigration laws.

2 states that were above Indian average participated in PISA 2012 got ranked the last and the second last of all participating 73 countries in the world.

The IQ thing is bullshite. This is all about work ethic and attitude.

Both Indian work ethic and study attitude in India are ok, or at least considered average in world standard, whereas Indian avg IQ is just a tad brighter than Negroids in Africa.
 
Any studies on cross-cultural adoptions?

Chinese kids growing up in non-Chinese households and vice versa?

There're as many studies as >40 on this.

See the famous cross-cultural adoption studies of middle-class Belgian parents adroping East Asia new born babies from mainly Korea also China and sub-sahara africa.

Those babies have grown up in Belgium, speaking French and Dutch (not a word of Korean, Chinese or Bandu), going through typical European scholling and medium European level of nutrition alongiwth exclusive average European cultural heritage and parantal care.

On average, however, the Koreans and the Chinese end up smarter than the Euroepan avg while the ones with sub sahara ethnic background drastically lower.
 
This chart is bullshit!

Because it's all about the selective immigration, as Indian immigrants to Australia are WELL above Indian average due to Australia's strict point-based immigration laws.

2 states that were above Indian average participated in PISA 2012 got ranked the last and the second last of all participating 73 countries in the world.



Both Indian work ethic and study attitude in India are ok, or at least considered average in world standard, whereas Indian avg IQ is just a tad brighter than Negroids in Africa.

India is a multi-caste population.

High-caste people don't consider low-caste people as part of them.


For them, the chart above, that show their own high-caste people report is very valuable information to them.

And they are very proud with it.
 
Singaporean Chinese has world highest IQ and blacks have the lowest.

..............................................

Blacks have the longest cockk length while East Asian is generally shorter.

..............................................

East Asian is very unlucky thou.

A little IQ gain, but huge drop in genital length.
 
India is a multi-caste population.

High-caste people don't consider low-caste people as part of them.


For them, the chart above, that show their own high-caste people report is very valuable information to them.

And they are very proud with it.

You have no clue.

It's not about so-called "high" caste and "low"caste at all.

The chart is about the very top end of Indian IQ bell curve, which includes people both BOTH"high"caste and "Low"caste.

In the very beginning of the Indian caste systems 1,000s years ago, it could be argued that the high caste back then were people from different ethnic background from the low caste.

Yet interbreeding between the 2 kinds throughout the history since then, in spite of rules or laws trying to prohibite it, were not trivial that it is now can be considered that Indians in India are homogeneous at the sub-continental level, despite the fact the they still keep regarding themselves as either "high"or "low"caste and propagating such disinfomation to the outside world. Genetically and statistically there are by and large no so called "high" or "low" caste in today's India , except some very isolated small "islands" of tribes, as they are about the same.

Its just about work ethic. I have met and studied with many Chinese. Many but not all are hardworking, many are lazy, some are very chill, some are smart. You have to understand that usually when ppl study overseas, its because they have scholarship or because they want to get experience or they plan to migrate. These ppl are obviously hardworking ppl, and since Chinese ppl are large in number, ppl assume that all of them are smart. No offense to any Chinese here, but I think they are just like any other race, there are good and bad and average in them as is in any other nation.


No offense taken. What you're saying is just about he general description of any IQ bell curve, including the Chinese one, which covers both the good, the bad and the ugly. So you made no point.

The OP point is about the Chinese AVERAGE.
 
Because of Chinese parents.

Look at the top scoring places in the world, Mainland, Hong Kong, Singapore.

It's Chinese parents, anyone with Chinese parents will understand first hand, how much pressure they put on us to be successful.

Try explain that to the ethnic Chinese in Belgium.

Ethnic Chinese in Belgium are amongst the most successful bunch in Belgian school system, most of them speaking no Chinese but Dutch or French, having no Chinese parents as they were adopted orphens shortly after they were born, and studying just about as hard as the average indigenous Belgians. :cheesy:
 
Try explain that to the ethnic Chinese in Belgium.

Ethnic Chinese in Belgium are amongst the most successful bunch in Belgian school system, most of them speaking no Chinese but Dutch or French, having no Chinese parents as they were adopted orphens shortly after they were born, and studying just about as hard as the average indigenous Belgians. :cheesy:

They were all orphans? Really?

Do you have a link to the study?

If a Chinese orphan was brought up in some LA ghetto by some gang runners, who didn't care about education, I doubt he would suddenly become Harvard material.
 
No offense taken. What you're saying is just about he general description of any IQ bell curve, including the Chinese one, which covers both the good, the bad and the ugly. So you made no point.
The OP point is about the Chinese AVERAGE.

I know, that's why I said that its mainly due to work ethic. Anyways, I've had enough discussion about this topic. I have a question to ask if you don't mind. Could you please elaborate on this quote "India is thirty-two separate nations that happen to be arrayed along the British rail line." (Lee Kuan Yew). I searched on google but couldn't find an explanation. Would appreciate if you could explain.
 
Singaporean Chinese has world highest IQ and blacks have the lowest.

View attachment 127549

Blacks have the longest cockk length while East Asian is generally shorter.

View attachment 127550



I doubt Singpore would have such a high average IQ without the recent fresh immigrant intakes from HK, China mainland and Taiwan, most of them scoring at the top end of their own correponding IQ curves.

Ditto for most recent Indian immigrants to Singapore. They also belong to the very top end of Indian IQ curve.

They were all orphans? Really?

Do you have a link to the study?

If a Chinese orphan was brought up in some LA ghetto by some gang runners, who didn't care about education, I doubt he would suddenly become Harvard material.

I don't have them at hand, but you can easily google them. These studies are quite famous in the field. Belgian cross-racial adoption studies: most East Asian kids there were of Korean background from the Korean War era, but also including some ethnic Chinese.
 
I doubt Singpore would have such a high average IQ without the recent fresh immigrant intakes from HK, China mainland and Taiwan, most of them scoring at the top end of their own correponding IQ curves.

Ditto for most recent Indian immigrants to Singapore. They also belong to the very top end of Indian IQ curve.

The recent migrant did pull up our IQ but take note that we have Malays and low caste Indians locals, and oops.... I would not want to say anything racist, but hope you get what I mean.

And for all international academic competition, Singaporean Chinese predominates.
 
If a Chinese orphan was brought up in some LA ghetto by some gang runners, who didn't care about education, I doubt he would suddenly become Harvard material.

The key is about average, and about comparison.

Of course you can't unrealistically expect such ghetto kids go to Harvard, but the key here is on avg they will perform better in IQ test than their equivalent counterparts from other races.

Furthermore, one can't simply measure Chinese avg IQ to which school they go to, because even some with very high IQ still can't go to any school unfortunately due to many other non-IQ factors.

IQ= inherited innate intellectual capabilities. (e.g. even as simple as thru one's reflection time)

School= knowledge leanred = hard work+opportunities +school fees+ connections ( particularly important for Harvard alike top names)

IQ=//=schooling

People's IQ can be largely measured as little as 2 year olds regardless which language they speak, or even they can't speak any at all, or which culture they have. Schooling can't.
 
The recent migrant did pull up our IQ but take note that we have Malays and low caste Indians locals, and oops.... I would not want to say anything racist, but hope you get what I mean.

And for all international academic competition, Singaporean Chinese predominates.

What i see why: extremely high IQ recent immigrants mostly ethnic Chinese from different places* have by and large compensated for Malays and Indian deficits, while indigenous ethnic Chinese Sigpaporeans have reached about the average Han Chinese IQ , most likely after the Flynn points.

* Some sources say that Taiwan alone has over 20,000 highly educated white colar workers working in Singapore, many of whom have Singaporean citizenship.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom