why Chinese culture can always absorb other cultures and India not

[INDIC]

Actually Hans have been shown to be more genetically homogeneous than Europeans. We are definitely not two different races. And what is this of the Indo-Aryans arriving in China? Any basic historian can tell you they never went further than the Tarim basin, or optimistically, as far as Gansu. But a simple genetic analysis will show that Han Chinese today are largely related to each other, no matter where they are found in the country, even more so than Europeans are related to each other.

Northern China and Southern China were two races who mixed over the centuries, same with India all races mixed over the centuries.

Actually, it's the other way around. The blue-eyed people Indianized the brown-eyed people. They replaced your culture with the current Hinduism based one.

The Yuezhi came afterwards and took upon themselves the Indo-Aryan culture of their genetic relatives that had conquered the subcontinent some 1500 years before. In fact, the original Indo-Aryans could have still been ruling the subcontinent as late as 500 AD.

Indo-Aryans were not blue eyed people and Indian culture is not entirely Aryan or Dravidian. The people who arrived in later centuries were blue-eyed who intermarried with Indians and Indianized.

Not sure what you mean... Chinese characters are definitely not related to the Latin script...

I am referring to pinyin. I don't use foreign alphabet to learn to pronounce my own language.

 

[walle]

Chinese (Han) has had an uniting identity from the Yan and huang emperors circa 2500 bc.

What is the Indian identity? British colonialism? Curry consumption? To date, significant language barriers still hinder travel between Indian states.

 

[INDIC]

All Han Chinese have the same halogroup 03, whether northern, southern or overseas chinese. Chinese civilization is our own creation and it spread across all East Asia, even though we do not directly rule places like Japan.

You are same now but modern Hans originated out of two ethnic groups once living in Northern China and another living in Southern China.

During the time of Yuezhi, there was no India culture so to speak, it was vedic aryan. Hinduism was not fully even established yet. Your so called indian names or culture were all taken from Persia starting from Avestan period.

Vedic culture is generally between 1500BC-700BC, much earlier than Yuezhi's migration into India in 1st century. Modern Indian culture also share lots of element with earlier Indus valley civilization, like Yoga originated during originated Indus valley civilization. By the time of Alexander invasion, Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism were established religions in India.

There is no comparison really. Your civilization was created by foreigner, over the course of history, it was shaped by various foreign elements either by invasion or migration into the subcontinent. Literally, your civilization was a mix and mash. Even your language today, Hindi, was formed during Mughal era with a strong Persian element.

Aryan came about 4000 years ago, how can that period be even termed like that. I can also claim Northern Hans colonized Southern Hans. Hindi is based on native Khariboli dialect which originated before Muslim invasion of India, Hindi has very little Persian words.

 

[China_Rising]

Northern China and Southern China were two races who mixed over the centuries, same with India all races mixed over the centuries.

No evidence of this.... please provide some.

Indo-Aryans were not blue eyed people

They originated on the Pontic-Caspian steppe in Eastern Europe. Of course they had many with blue eyes.

90% of the Bronze Age period mtDNA haplogroups were of west Eurasian origin and the study determined that at least 60% of the individuals overall (out of the 26 Bronze and Iron Age human remains' samples of the study that could be tested) had light hair and blue or green eyes.

Ancient DNA provides new insights into the history of south Siberian Kurgan people - Springer

A 2004 study also established that during the Bronze Age/Iron Age period, the majority of the population of Kazakhstan (part of the Andronovo culture during Bronze Age), was of west Eurasian origin (with mtDNA haplogroups such as U, H, HV, T, I and W), and that prior to the 13th–7th century BCE, all Kazakh samples belonged to European lineages.

Out of 10 human male remains assigned to the Andronovo horizon from the Krasnoyarsk region, 9 possessed the R1a Y-chromosome haplogroup and one C-M130 haplogroup (xC3). mtDNA haplogroups of nine individuals assigned to the same Andronovo horizon and region were as follows: U4 (2 individuals), U2e, U5a1, Z, T1, T4, H, and K2b.

Unravelling migrations in the steppe: mitochondrial DNA sequences from ancient central Asians.

The people who arrived in later centuries were blue-eyed who intermarried with Indians and Indianized.

Yes, and so were the Indo-Aryans before them, who came from Eastern Europe and Central Asia. In fact, the 'Indianized' into a European culture. The Dravidian (and other native Indians) were not in a position to "Indianize" anyone or anything.

I don't use foreign alphabet to learn to pronounce my own language.

No, because your language itself is entirely foreign, including the alphabet, the script, and everything else. And I'm not just referring to English... How many Indians speak and Indo-Europeans language as their 'native' tongue?

 

[INDIC]

Chinese (Han) has had an uniting identity from the Yan and huang emperors circa 2500 bc.

What is the Indian identity? British colonialism? Curry consumption? To date, significant language barriers still hinder travel between Indian states.

Indians also have ancient identity.

Modern China is based on American and British legacy who liberated China from the Japanese.

 

[China_Rising]

Like Yoga originated during originated Indus valley civilization. By the time of Alexander invasion, Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism were established religions in India.

Yoga experienced it's modern incarnation during the Vedic period.

And yes, Buddhism, Jainism, and Hinduism were established religions... because of the Indo-Aryans...

 

[walle]

Indians also have ancient identity.

Modern China is based on American and British legacy who liberated China from the Japanese.

Post civil war china threw out every foreigner and won the right to self govern in its entirety in over 150 years, India on the other hand embraced its colonial past, so much to the extent your congress is still ruled by a caucasian.

 

[INDIC]

Yoga experienced it's modern incarnation during the Vedic period.

And yes, Buddhism, Jainism, and Hinduism were established religions... because of the Indo-Aryans...

Yoga originated during Indus valley civilization and developed across centuries. Indo-Aryan intermarried with other races.

No evidence of this.... please provide some.



They originated on the Pontic-Caspian steppe in Eastern Europe. Of course they had many with blue eyes.



Ancient DNA provides new insights into the history of south Siberian Kurgan people - Springer





Unravelling migrations in the steppe: mitochondrial DNA sequences from ancient central Asians.



Yes, and so were the Indo-Aryans before them, who came from Eastern Europe and Central Asia. In fact, the 'Indianized' into a European culture. The Dravidian (and other native Indians) were not in a position to "Indianize" anyone or anything.



No, because your language itself is entirely foreign, including the alphabet, the script, and everything else. And I'm not just referring to English... How many Indians speak and Indo-Europeans language as their 'native' tongue?

Like all of China except Zhongyuan plains were colonized by Hans.

 

[beijingwalker]

Indians also have ancient identity.

Modern China is based on American and British legacy who liberated China from the Japanese.

that's really stupid,it's like saying that Russian was ruled by Germany cause the battle was first fought on Russian land,beside,I heard no one says that Chinese culture is basically Japanese culture,but almost all people,including Japanese themselvs say Japanese culture is a branch of Chinese culture.

 

[China_Rising]

Like all of China except Zhongyuan plains were colonized by Hans.

Han were the colonizers, not the other way around.

Indians were the colonized, by Indo-Aryan Europeans, Tocharians, Mongols and Turks, British, and many others.

 

[INDIC]

Post civil war china threw out every foreigner and won the right to self govern in its entirety in over 150 years, India on the other hand embraced its colonial past, so much to the extent your congress is still ruled by a caucasian.

We are still free to elect them unlike your Presidents none of them became President according the the wishes of Chinese people.

 

[INDIC]

Han were the colonizers, not the other way around.

Indians were the colonized, by Indo-Aryan Europeans, Tocharians, Mongols and Turks, British, and many others.

That's true for China also.

 

[SwatCat]

Afghanistan, Indonesia and Malaysia are all influenced by Dharmic culture. You can see the influence of India even now in Malaysia,Indonesia South East Asia.

You are nothing but a troll who are going hysterical here

Why has your dharmic hindu religion been beaten so badly in Afghanistan, southeast asia (malaysia and indonesia) that it is confined to the puny island of Bali and a few other pockets?

Hu Shih was a member of the May Fourth Movement, which advocated destroying traditional Chinese culture and language and replacing it with western culture. Why should i give a **** as to what he allegedly said?

And provide me a source for that quote, a non indian source.

 

[China_Rising]

That's true for China also.

Mongols are East Asians, and anyway, they are the only one's.

The 2nd pic is irrelevant. China was never colonized in her history.

 

[INDIC]

Mongols are East Asians, and anyway, they are the only one's.

The 2nd pic is irrelevant. China was never colonized in her history.

But China was open for the loot during colonial period even without foreign conquest.