What's new

Who's More important? Pakistan or COAS :Imran Khan

Who's more important?

  • Pakistan

  • Army Chief


Results are only viewable after voting.
Why not just work with government for Betterment of country?

PTI was the best government Pakistan had


Imran Khan in one of the interview has said this 'a strong civilian government complements a strong Pak Army', and vice versa.

But the neutrals want the power and pelf and hegemony, they feel insecure in loosing the power to a popular civilian leader, which is happening. The more they try to suppress it, the faster it will rise.
 
Last edited:
A weaker and 'minding their own business' Estab. means a not so weaker Pakistan.

So in the end it looks to be good, the current fiasco. This is the first time they are challenged and they are exposed and cut to size, put in place, already.
Yes, as it seems currently, Pakistan’s stability and well being is inversely proportional to establishment’s clout.

This is happening. The wheels have started to move slowly. We can only hope it goes full throttle and we achieve terminal velocity.
 

Some people are saying all this happened because of COAS appointment in November
So who's More important army chief or Pakistan

Do they even think where Pakistan is heading towards
They were afraid that i would appoint Lt. general faiz as COAS which i had never thought about
, acha jee,,,
general hameed himself was , a tout of CIA< he got all of his haram keh dollars by selling drugs through, taliban,,
but nevermind, he,s already in, hell

Stupid question

Of course Army and its chief are more important

Pakistan (along with bloody civilians) can go to hell
-lunn is more important,
he,ill find a bhuddi, on every corner, when ever he wants- ciao
 
Imran Khan in one of the interview has said this ' a strong civilian government complements a strong Pak Army', and vice versa.

But the neutrals want the power and pelf and hegemony, they feel insecure in loosing the power to a popular civilian leader, which is happening. The more they try to suppress it, the faster it will rise.

Listen to this today's clip where khan is explaining authority and responsibility

Army have all the authority but if something wrong happens it's the responsibility of government they'll be answerable
 
should we not have better standards? Simply put add another option - being a muslim and knowing that that means.
That will surely solve all the problems and no im not with any islamic party or molanas as they have not spoken a bit about what has happened at the leats much less think of them starting a proper revolution to bring about actual islamic rules in everyday life.
 
Pakistan is working on who has the power in the country. Unfortunately Pakistan (as the other answer has noted.) has a history of military governments and that is not a good idea. civilian rule is most desirable. Case in point was of General Raheel Sharif, the army chief then wanted to topple the government, he was so popular the people would have welcomed him to take over. However he in fact remained committed to that civilian rule even at the height of prolonged ‘sit-ins’ in the most sensitive parts of the capital and let the political process proceed. Pity bajwa did not follow this brave path probably was not strong enough or had the metal to allowed inran khan to continue to govern on a his popular party manifesto that got them elected on! Fight corruption, and be independent to Washington!!!
 
Imran himself is responsible for giving extensions.

An extension of the most senior post of COAS leads to political engineering, this is a given in Pakistan. Imran Khan was oblivious of this aspect, he trust people easily.

And at the fag end of a General, a COAS career, the greed for power and pelf becomes many times higher, and the greed for more money, greed for plots and permits increases as the tenure gets close to the retirement.
 

Some people are saying all this happened because of COAS appointment in November
So who's More important army chief or Pakistan

Do they even think where Pakistan is heading towards
They were afraid that i would appoint Lt. general faiz as COAS which i had never thought about

Wrong question. The answer is both.

The question should have been

What is more important?

1) IK being PM illegally
2) Nation of Pakistan

The answer is obviouslly the Nation of Pakistan
 
Stupid question

Of course Army and its chief are more important

Pakistan (along with bloody civilians) can go to hell

People of a country make a nation, army is nothing more then a border police. Without a country there is no army so enlighten us how civilians can go to hell whose taxes pay the soldiers pay cheques??? Boot licking at best.
 
Back
Top Bottom