Who will Sikhs Support?

[Novice09]

who had made this thread alive again?

what a silly question. Obviously the Indian Sikhs will support India and Pakistani Sikhs will support Pakistan

 

[jinxeD_girl]

who had made this thread alive again?

Iqbal_Brar

 

[FireFighter]

Sikhs will support the TURBAN!!!

 

[Spitfighter]

Yeh we can see the height of complex in your not only moview industry but also in your TV industry wherein Indians show even dead women in full make up and tons of Gold wearing

And on top of that Raja Mahraja sahab culture lolzz

Come on man India is not that shining.

Come out of the fake world.

Well at least its our own fantasy, who's asking you guys to watch it? I don't understand why so many Pakistanis watch our movies anyway.

Our movies, our soaps, who's to stop us from making them as we please?

Perhaps when Pakistanis start making their own movies/shows they can depict India more 'realistically'.

 

[Iqbal_Brar]

There cud be some truth to ur story but it is to bring to ur notice that when the first demographics in 1910 were conducted, sikhs and jains were considered as sub-sect of hindus , even religious leaders didn't protest it then (if u want source just google it), But i dont know if that is given as justification to not having a separate law for sikhs unlike muslims in india...

No, the British had a seperate Anand Karg act for the Sikhs. The Hindus were the ones which put us, along with Buddhists and Jains as sects of Hinduism in the Indian constitution. We don't care about having seperate law; all we want is to be stop branded as Hindus. But Indian constitution is anything but secular. Even the Indian army had a limit of number of sardar Sikhs being allowed to join. Sikhs, who did not want to cut their hair and grow bears can only join Sikh regiment, which had limited number of soldiers. You could not exceed that number. Other Sikhs had to be spread out across other regiments. Its probably only time where a quota in India has been put in place to restrict number of Sikhs. And than there is also case of RSS groups re-writing Sikh history books to favour Hinduism.

 

[equiliz3r]

No, the British had a seperate Anand Karg act for the Sikhs. The Hindus were the ones which put us, along with Buddhists and Jains as sects of Hinduism in the Indian constitution. We don't care about having seperate law; all we want is to be stop branded as Hindus. But Indian constitution is anything but secular. Even the Indian army had a limit of number of sardar Sikhs being allowed to join. Sikhs, who did not want to cut their hair and grow bears can only join Sikh regiment, which had limited number of soldiers. You could not exceed that number. Other Sikhs had to be spread out across other regiments. Its probably only time where a quota in India has been put in place to restrict number of Sikhs. And than there is also case of RSS groups re-writing Sikh history books to favour Hinduism.

lol, in 12 regiments their are sikhs in India...................that also with turbans..

Who said only sikh regiment can have turbaned soldiers??????

 

[RobbieS]

No, the British had a seperate Anand Karg act for the Sikhs. The Hindus were the ones which put us, along with Buddhists and Jains as sects of Hinduism in the Indian constitution. We don't care about having seperate law; all we want is to be stop branded as Hindus. But Indian constitution is anything but secular. Even the Indian army had a limit of number of sardar Sikhs being allowed to join. Sikhs, who did not want to cut their hair and grow bears can only join Sikh regiment, which had limited number of soldiers. You could not exceed that number. Other Sikhs had to be spread out across other regiments. Its probably only time where a quota in India has been put in place to restrict number of Sikhs. And than there is also case of RSS groups re-writing Sikh history books to favour Hinduism.

Check your sources bro. Two of my second cousins are Sikhs who have cut their hair are officers in the Indian army.

Don't get me wrong bro but you gotta come down to India to see the real situation. And please dont feed me the RSS re-writing Sikh history cr@p. Sikhs are not so weak in India that they can't even protect their own history. Its not like our history is in any danger anyways.

 

[Hulk]

Check your sources bro. Two of my second cousins are Sikhs who have cut their hair are officers in the Indian army.

Don't get me wrong bro but you gotta come down to India to see the real situation. And please dont feed me the RSS re-writing Sikh history cr@p. Sikhs are not so weak in India that they can't even protect their own history. Its not like our history is in any danger anyways.

The only way one can rewrite history is by making sure no one knows the other version, till then it will just be another version of history.

 

[Iqbal_Brar]

lol, in 12 regiments their are sikhs in India...................that also with turbans..

Who said only sikh regiment can have turbaned soldiers??????

Check your sources bro. Two of my second cousins are Sikhs who have cut their hair are officers in the Indian army.

Don't get me wrong bro but you gotta come down to India to see the real situation. And please dont feed me the RSS re-writing Sikh history cr@p. Sikhs are not so weak in India that they can't even protect their own history. Its not like our history is in any danger anyways.

Your "Sikh" cousins would never qualify for Sikh regiment. Yes, I know there are sardars (who don't grow full beards and trim) and clean cut Sikhs in other regiments, but the real regiment, which has the Khalsas, the REAL Sikhs, is the Sikh regiment, and its numbers were limited by Indian government. In Sikh regiment, you are not allowed to cut even inch of hair, you are not allowed to bring alcohol or any drugs on the base, you must stricly adhere to the Rehat Maryada, the Sikh code of conduct. It is a deeply religious regiment. Infact, when Operation Bluestar happened, many soldiers of Sikh regiment at the HQs at Ramgarh in Bihar mutinied, killed their commander, General RS Puri, and started heading to Punjab with truckloads of weapons as they thought they had been betrayed by Indian army. Another Sikh unit deployed down south in Pune also rebelled. This led to the Indian army mixing many of the originally purely battalions into mixed Hindu-Sikh battalions (called Vaidya's Battalions, because General Vaidya came up with idea of diluting the Sikh regiments). Although, Sikhs managed to maintain their regiment, 13th Sikhs, still ended up being mixed and is called a "Vaidya Battalion". So I don't know if you guys are misinformed about Sikh regiment or what, but that is only a small insight.

As for RSS, attacking Sikh religion, its very much a reality: Rashtri Sikh Sangat RSS Hinduization

 

[jinxeD_girl]

This is from 2001? no wonder no one watches these movies, but hey, at least you're having fun.

Teray Pyar Mein was a big box office hit of 2001, it means many Pakistanis must have watched it. And who says NO ONE watches Pakistani Movies? I watch movies from all over the world, Iranian, Egyptian, Indian, Hollywood etc etc and ofcourse Pakistani... As far as Pakistani movies are concerned, I don't watch new ones.. only OLD B/W ones when Lollywood was at is Zenith.. the music of old Lollywood movies from 50s/60s is exceptional and many Lollywood songs have been copied by your film industry.. only technically they are inferior to Indian films...

 

[jinxeD_girl]

have you ever come in lucknow??if not then how can you sure that lucknow girlz wear ghararas at home??

Then what do Lucknow girls wear at home? Mini Skirts?

Well whatever they wear... it is not my concern.. I was just guessing.. I was just stating the fact that none of the ethnic groups of Pakistan (except Urdu speakers) wear gararas at home.. even urdu speakers don't wear it anymore.. and Punjabis hardly speak "flowery urdu" as shown stereotypically in your films.. they usually mix punjabi words with urdu and have slight accent...

 

[jinxeD_girl]

Gadar was made to earn money and it has done it fantastically ..

Gadar remained highest-grossing Bollywood films from 2001 to 2005

Good! In other words... anti-Pakistani movies are biggest box-office earners in India!!

 

[jinxeD_girl]

I am done brushing with my teeth.. before I finally go to bed[/B]...

Yeah yeah! It was a typo.. you can forgive me for that.. instead of nitpicking on everything I say! It was funny though!!

 

[jinxeD_girl]

Hahahaha "Hamari marzi" it's our industry??
what we like we will do "Aapko kya"?

Himmat ho to Roak sako to roak lo.......

Who I am to stop you guyz!! But it is little annoying to see many Indian films showing Pakistani girl or Muslim girl running away with Indian Sikh or Hindu

I mean why would a SANE Pakistani girl in her right mind would want to marry an Indian guy... let alone run away with him ? Most (with very few exceptions) Pakistani girls are ethnocentric and stick with their Pakistani men and Pakistani men are generally better looking than Indian men.

But Pakistani film makers are good at one thing though... They always show either Kashmiri Brahamin Girl (as shown in Lakhoun Mein Aik) falling in love with Muslim guy or Sikh girl (as in Teray Pyar Mein). Maybe the film makers know those are the only 2 girl groups which are kinda attractive in India I mean they never show girlz from Kerala falling in love with Pakistani men

 

[jinxeD_girl]

More like Pakistani girl.

AND Muslim girl too! Bombay (1995) showed Indian Muslim girl falling in love with Hindu guy and the film was temporarily banned as Indian Muslims objected to that.