What's new

Who Killed Gen. Zia Ul Haq

Real question is whether an ambassador can be sacrificed ...? This is something which makes CIA involvement a little doubtful.
ISI ( or, atleast someone important from it ) must be involved. KGB cant be ruled out.

They didn't know Zia would have invited the ambassador onto his plane. That was never factored in. Article clearly points to that as well.

It was not the KGB. It was the CIA.

I whole heartily agree. You have to believe the Zionists had a hand in this as well. They never wanted a nuclear Pakistan and Zia wasn't going to stop there.
 
I whole heartily agree. You have to believe the Zionists had a hand in this as well.
As far as I know the relationship between Zia and "the Zionists" was one-way: he gave the orders and the Israelis obeyed. I think he was the only general of a Muslim country - certainly he was the first - to command Israeli troops in joint operations. (see Black September.)

Everything I've read so far emphasizes that from the beginning of Pakistan's nuclear program it was a U.S. concern as the U.S. didn't want to encourage nuclear proliferation.
 
As far as I know the relationship between Zia and "the Zionists" was one-way: he gave the orders and the Israelis obeyed. I think he was the only general of a Muslim country - certainly he was the first - to command Israeli troops in joint operations. (see Black September.)

Everything I've read so far emphasizes that from the beginning of Pakistan's nuclear program it was a U.S. concern as the U.S. didn't want to encourage nuclear proliferation.

True he definitively has a positive relationship especially with Mossad but that was for as long as he was useful. Once the soviets were repelled in Afghanistan he was of no more use and had once again become a threat especially if the plans stated in this excerpt of him wanting to create an Islamic Union was true.
 
Zia was the only leader in the Muslim world that would not take **** from anyone, whether they were Islamists, or not. People feared him, and all the leaders around the world loved him.


He is also a distant relative of mine.
 
Zia was the only leader in the Muslim world that would not take **** from anyone, whether they were Islamists, or not. People feared him, and all the leaders around the world loved him.


He is also a distant relative of mine.

Sorry to burst your bubble but you lost Siachin war in his tenure. He didnt had th capacities to overcome giant named India. Yes Mushy had those capabilities. But in Kargil he lost it too. Zia was one of the worst leaders of Pakistan.
 
Sorry to burst your bubble but you lost Siachin war in his tenure. He didnt had th capacities to overcome giant named India. Yes Mushy had those capabilities. But in Kargil he lost it too. Zia was one of the worst leaders of Pakistan.
You'r not even a Pakistani.

Zia had enough momentum to be one the greatest leaders in the world. If he was alive and gained enough support, India would have been in serious trouble.


Now If you want to turn into a Jingo, do me a favour, and don't respond to me.
 
Nice read. One theory suggests that there is possibility of US hand in the incident. But why US would killed their own ambassador for that. Isnt it!
Zia ul Haq killed the leader of PPP, Bhutto.
PPP just took revenge with the help of some foreign country/weapon.
Do you believe that PPP jialas would keep quit after hard suffering, In jails, and punishment under the Bloody dictatorship of Zia ul Haq.
 
Zia ul Haq killed the leader of PPP, Bhutto.
PPP just took revenge with the help of some foreign country/weapon.
Do you believe that PPP jialas would keep quit after hard suffering, In jails, and punishment under the Bloody dictatorship of Zia ul Haq.

Bhutto was a dog and a traitor and deserved what he got.
 
Bhutto was a dog and a traitor and deserved what he got.
offtopic
Yar here everybody is dog. From Rairhi wala till the leader.
Look the prices of fruits and chicken.
And they says Holy Ramdan while everybody is busy for Stock in Illegal warehouses.
From same money they will perform Hajj:hitwall::hitwall:
 
the american ambassador was a last minute invite by zia. the plan was already in motion. i guess i can see where you are coming from. its difficult for u to digest that america/cia have their share of dirty tricks and countless overthrows of democratic countries. history is replete with such examples.

Not at all.. I have no particular liking for America. I come from a socialist family. And I do know a little about the dirty deeds of CIA...

What I asked was an honest query.
 
Bhutto was a dog and a traitor and deserved what he got.

I dislike Bhutto and he is a reason for a lot of our problems.

But by killing him like that gave PPP the power to use the "shaheed" slogan and the have milked it ever since to win elections. It would have been better to let him finish his term and maybe after seeing what a bad leader he was, PPP would have been finished back then rather than now.
 
I dislike Bhutto and he is a reason for a lot of our problems.

But by killing him like that gave PPP the power to use the "shaheed" slogan and the have milked it ever since to win elections. It would have been better to let him finish his term and maybe after seeing what a bad leader he was, PPP would have been finished back then rather than now.

He is the biggest traitor in our history. He was the reason our country broke into half. He deserved to be hanged.
 
He is the biggest traitor in our history. He was the reason our country broke into half. He deserved to be hanged.
At-least yar thanks to him. Due to him, our 90,000 soldiers returned back. It was shameless incident in the history of Books when 90,000 our soldier dropped guns. At least they should get Shahadat for the country.
But on the other side Bhutto was brave than soldier. He gave sacrifice. Guess who was brave??
Truth may be bitter for you and yes it hurts when we see 1971.
 

Back
Top Bottom