What's new

Where can i read about Aryan vs dravidian war stories?

The funnier part is, the more some people got invaded, the more they become fairer and the more proud they become.

:lol: Pta nahi kis sabzi ka halwa hain ham log...
Hurts and shames me no end to say this, but, I'm involved in a line where I see it all too often.. this legendary "gori chamdee ki ghulami" to a certain extent.

Aapke waha ka bhi wohi haal hai lol

ek ajeeb sa view of goras, ki vo bkl humsay upar hai...

ab toh scene globalize ho gya hai, but is type ka behaviour dikh jaata hai.. or maybe its a Punjabi thing.. gora pta ni kya aa gya bc.. yahan sab sloot marna shuru, bc bhikaris. :lol:

-------------------------

sharmnaak baat hai but rofl
 
. .
Hurts and shames me no end to say this, but, I'm involved in a line where I see it all too often.. this legendary "gori chamdee ki ghulami" to a certain extent.

Aapke waha ka bhi wohi haal hai lol

ek ajeeb sa view of goras, ki vo bkl humsay upar hai...

ab toh scene globalize ho gya hai, but is type ka behaviour dikh jaata hai.. or maybe its a Punjabi thing.. gora pta ni kya aa gya bc.. yahan sab sloot marna shuru, bc bhikaris. :lol:

-------------------------

sharmnaak baat hai but rofl
Hamary yahan subko hai yeh bimari... Gora ho bacha, bs phir, larkion ki line.
Anyway, Africa is rising slowly, and I can already see the world will see a tilt toward the blackish one.
Trend ki bat hai, koi ganja hojaey or popular hojaey tu sub chal perhtay usky pechy main main kerty..
 
.
Aryans are Iranic and steppe people.. not exactly your "blue eyed blond" folk

German man woulda gassed and made soapcakes/soapkikes lol of them too.. banda Nordic genes ka shaukeen tha.



they're very fond of some aspects of dharmic symbology and culture somehow

modern India me koi naam o nishaan ni indigenous blond people ka.. folk in Gilgit B in Pk and Afghanistan still have some observable lingering gene thing going on from what I seen online and IRL.

In India, OG curly haired dark skinned dravidians like that lovely couple in the elephant whisperers are the OGs of the far south Indian region.. baaki are a mix, varying degrees.. north east oriental looking folk are a whole different subject.

big topic, often gets uncomfortable and contentious... I'm not sure what to make of it all.

@Paitoo @DESERT FIGHTER @Joe Shearer sb @iamnobody @hussain0216 (tu bhi aa hi jaa lol)

@jamahir bhikari @Skimming (there) @villageidiot (wr art thou ?) @Areesh @Maula Jatt @fitpOsitive

pls tag others who you think might be interested in a civil discussion about the whole thing.

shukriya, dhanyavaad. 🙏
I am a little confused. Actually, more than a little.

Why am I tagged, and what is expected of me?

Where can i read about Aryan vs dravidian war stories? Aryan must have written their proud stories of conquering such a large landmass of Earth.
I seem to have answered this somewhere, perhaps outside PDF.

In the Rg Veda, and, indirectly, in the two major epics.

The

The intruding Aryans unfortunately destroyed the existing system of writing completely. The same happened in Cyprus and Southern Greece to Mycenean cultures. Typically it takes some 300 years or 10 generations to invent a new one.
There was no existing system of writing.

However, that stops nobody from opining about it.

Go to the fantasy section of the Amazon books, and search for US liberal and Islamic authors. They are considered as an expert in this imaginary domain.
PS: Advanced DNA testing proved that migration happened from India to central ASIA not vice versa.
Crap.

Sounds as if this member is one of the believers in the OOI theory.

Put him on your ignore list. Those people are beyond salvaging.

The Vedas/all Hindu holy scriptures.
It's literally all just a justification for why it was morally right for the Aryans to conquer and enslave the Dravidian natives via the cast system.
Of course they put themselves on the top as Brahmins and the Dravidians at the bottom as the untouchables.
Well, very largely so.

What is stated above covers more space than needed, but is not entirely unfounded.

I'm not Aryan I am Indo-scythian 😁

In all seriousness IDK lol, IDK Aryans,scythian , Dravidians or any other nibbas and tbvh nor do I care

Mostly Hindu nationalist and white nationalists are interested in such things, but they'll have thier own biases

I'd Love to hear a short and sweet version from a neutral person
It already exists, and is composed by experts.

At least we can find some events of that Aryan vs Indus Dravidians in the local literature of Tamils or Telugus who still have intact local languages.
Sadly, no.
 
Last edited:
.
It's hard to believe that the people who built world's largest and advanced civilization never fought back to Aryans
Which Civilisation was this? Not the IVC, I hope.

LOL 💯 bro, same.. but BC puk gaye hain yahan this race thing ko le ke.. mujhe bhi honestly inaa koi interest or obsession ni hai.. fukn' silly on every level imaginable.. unless one is into proper study vs "main ji yeh hu, vo hu.. those guys alag cheez hai"

Far from a scholar here, or even well read on these matters apart from casual skimming thru some random articles/vids etc.

Ek cheez pta hai but.. very dark skinned extreme south India waaley are "dravidians" .. baaki most "aryans" lel


Dravs:
whisper.jpg


"arya"
Virat_Kohli_during_the_India_vs_Aus_4th_Test_match_at_Narendra_Modi_Stadium_on_09_March_2023.jpg



White nationalists, yes.. but then they mostly on about uber blond blue eyed Nordic folk.. from what I can gather. That crowd toh Italians and Spaniards etc ki bhi aisi tasi kar de :P


+1

doubt there are any. Whole thing is fascinating, but not for reasons of racial "superiority", or "inferiority" or anything of the sort.

like I said, gets very contentious and uncomfortable for many.. so much BS around it all.
Confusing post. What is it trying to say?

There is a lot of misconception about who the Dravidians are. We take them to be the south Indians, but it is not entirely correct. The present south Indians are a mix of Dravidians and native tribes of south India. Dravidians themselves are of Iranic or Arabic origin and migrated to India before the Aryans. They intermarried with the locals over centuries and thus look different from the Aryans who came later. They have a lot of diversity in their skin tones and faces and this is determined by how much they are mixed with the local tribes.
🤙🤙🤙🤙🤙

There are theories that say that Scythians were also Aryans. But since they came to the sub continent after the Aryans, who had by then already absorbed the local communities, they looked different. The Indo Scythians probably looked like what the Aryans looked like when they first came to the sub continent.
Just for laughs, look up Parama Kamboja from the battle scenes. Kamboja is a surname still prized in the north-west.

Archetypal shakals present kro na.. like I did with that lovely Elephant couple, and Virat Kholi.

This is all a bit beyond me tbh.. simplify..

wtr India:

north are slightly lighter toned but not proper gora type.. proper gora nords etc, unki toh veins bhi dikh jaata hai through their skin.

south are mostly kala rang folk.. the curly haired lot among them might have some African ancestry maybe ?

east toh everyone knows -_-

beech waaley, the vast majority mixed hain.

Indonesia and Pinoys ka bhi weird sa scene hai.. like if a:

Punjabi had at it with a Chinese, out would pop an Indonesian.

Or a Spanish got with a Chinese, you get a Pinoy type.
May the merciful heavens help me to remain sane.

The Dravidians you posted actually look like south Indians with predominantly tribal origins. A south Indian with mixed Dravidian and tribal origins could be someone like DK Shivakumar, the man in the news these days-

View attachment 930476

His daughter can pass off for a north Indian Aryan girl:

View attachment 930477
They are Gowdas, btw, Vokkaliggas, nothing particularly noted for exclusivity in breeding.
 
Last edited:
.
There is nothing like Aryan vs dravidian war. Its more a present day social construct to distinguish languages.

South Asian people in general have mixture from mainly 3 genetic groups;

First, the aboriginal strand, recently named as Ancient Ancestral South Indians (AASI). These are the ancient people who are the forefathers of all Asian people. Probably just 300 came this way around 75,000 BC.

Second, West Asian agriculturalists who migrated out of what is now western Iran (Zagros), perhaps as early as 8,500 years ago. These are most probably the so called Dravidian language originators and most likely Indus Valley civilization. Their mixture with AASI is presently called the ASI component.

Finally, appearing less than 4,000 years ago, Central Asian pastoralists, who are called Indo Aryans coming from the BMAC region and most likely brought the Vedic belief to South Asia. Their mixture with AASI and ASI is called ANI component.

All of these genetic groups are mixed in varied proportions across the region and it was gradual mixture of population. For example, even sone remote tribal population (SC/ST) in mainland India has at least 15-20% of steppe ANI component.

Endogamy and caste system began only during Gupta empire. Before that population mixture had happened already.
 
.
.
There is nothing like Aryan vs dravidian war. Its more a present day social construct to distinguish languages.

South Asian people in general have mixture from mainly 3 genetic groups;

First, the aboriginal strand, recently named as Ancient Ancestral South Indians (AASI). These are the ancient people who are the forefathers of all Asian people. Probably just 300 came this way around 75,000 BC.

Second, West Asian agriculturalists who migrated out of what is now western Iran (Zagros), perhaps as early as 8,500 years ago. These are most probably the so called Dravidian language originators and most likely Indus Valley civilization. Their mixture with AASI is presently called the ASI component.

Finally, appearing less than 4,000 years ago, Central Asian pastoralists, who are called Indo Aryans coming from the BMAC region and most likely brought the Vedic belief to South Asia. Their mixture with AASI and ASI is called ANI component.

All of these genetic groups are mixed in varied proportions across the region and it was gradual mixture of population. For example, even sone remote tribal population (SC/ST) in mainland India has at least 15-20% of steppe ANI component.

Endogamy and caste system began only during Gupta empire. Before that population mixture had happened already.
Finally some serious post

Baqi sare te tito partian e la rae ne
 
. .
Aryans are Iranic and steppe people.. not exactly your "blue eyed blond" folk

German man woulda gassed and made soapcakes/soapkikes lol of them too.. banda Nordic genes ka shaukeen tha.



Why are you posting two vids of a half-naked man ?

In India, OG curly haired dark skinned dravidians like that lovely couple in the elephant whisperers are the OGs of the far south Indian region.. baaki are a mix, varying degrees.. north east oriental looking folk are a whole different subject.

That film is quite a Bhakt film ( elephant god and all ) hence it was sent to the Oscars along with that other irritating ridiculousness : the "Chuna chuna" song. And Modi jee met with that "lovely couple".

Why wasn't this film sent to the Oscars ?

@Joe Shearer @Drizzt @Paitoo @Mentee @fitpOsitive @Jf Thunder
 
.
That film is quite a Bhakt film ( elephant god and all ) hence it was sent to the Oscars along with that other irritating ridiculousness : the "Chuna chuna" song. And Modi jee met with that "lovely couple".

Why wasn't this film sent to the Oscars ?
you continue to disappoint, Munawar.

ab aapne elephant whisperers jaise amazing feel good and beautiful nature and animal/human bonding movie me bhi kuch "Sanghi" angle nikal lia ... tsk tsk .. feel sorry for you, bro.

---------------

natu natu was pretty catchy too.. Tamil ? .. I only know it from those cricket something adds ..

 
. .
Is Mortimer Wheeler a credible historian regarding this subcontinent?

@Joe Shearer @STREANH @Maula Jatt
I have no idea about historians. Most of the ancient history is unknown due to lack of written historical evidence. So anthropologists involved in this can shed more light than historians imo.

I just saw someone on reddit who made a video about this topic. Its in Hindi though
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom