What's new

Whatever

@waz @Blue Marlin

Hello buddies,seems like Theresa May is now the only one to replace Dave,what do you think about her ? What's her projects ?

@Providence
she alright but the test is when she negoatiats with the eu, but chances they will not be budging at all to ensure no other states get any ideas. personally just get single market acess with the one market agreement. but she must ensure if they arenot working and contributing they are out.
 
.
Xiexie !

What kind of programming you do?
\("▔□▔)/
I have just graduated from high school.
After about a month,I will study in one of C9 universities and major in Computer Science and Technology~(I will soon become a programmer,but not now..)

By the way,are you a programmer?(If you are..May I ask you some questions when I encounter difficulties after I enter university?)
 
Last edited:
.
\("▔□▔)/
I have just graduated from high school.
After about a month,I will study in one of C9 universities and major in Computer Science and Technology~(I will soon become a programmer,but not now..)

By the way,are you a programmer?(If you are..May I ask you some questions when I encounter difficulties after I enter university?)

images


Yes I am a programmer and a designer.

I design micro chips !

I am a specialist in verilog/vhdl coding !

We live in the world of binary digits.
 
.
@waz @Blue Marlin

Hello buddies,seems like Theresa May is now the only one to replace Dave,what do you think about her ? What's her projects ?

@Providence

Theresa May is sort of right wing but ironically a cool headed and skillful lady. Her speech does enthuse confidence of the sort we British like. She has however promised no miracles but have an aura of "steady as she goes" & "I can do this".
Having been the Shadow Leader of the House of Commons and Chair of the Conservative Party, she knows how Parliament and the Party works inside and out.
She was a virtual work and pensions secretary and therefore I believe she knows rather a lot about the kind of issues that will need to be addressed if we are going to dig ourselves out of this mess economically. She is a steely negotiator who has built a solid reputation at home and abroad.

She has some cons though. E.g. She chose to be mildly "remain" which might be detrimental n getting a A-star team and having her way in the house. Overall I like her.
 
Last edited:
.
@waz @Blue Marlin

Hello buddies,seems like Theresa May is now the only one to replace Dave,what do you think about her ? What's her projects ?

@Providence

Well she is level headed and has experience. She has been a Eurosceptic, and has made it clear that Brexit is happening, which will please the voters. She supports equal pay, maternity rights and wants to work for low income families.
She is very strong on immigration, and many of her policies were considered extreme even by conservative standards, hence her refusal to guarantee the rights of EU citizens until assurances can be given by Spain and France, where the bulk of our retired folks reside.
The bottom line she does has the support of the party and the country needs stability.
 
. .
@Nilgiri

I take it you are incapable of answering my simple question. You resort to the statistics. Bear in mind, you have to take certain factors into the accounts like the background such as lack of proper resources and funding in other countries comparison to USA who enjoys greater budgets.

Why is it that other nations like UK still enjoy the privileges that police uses baton to discipline with, and not guns? Why US doesn't enjoy that privilege? Why accidental shooting is normal routine in USA including that thread that just got deleted attest to that?
 
.
Why is it that other nations like UK still enjoy the privileges that police uses baton to discipline with, and not guns?

No massive drug and gang warfare. If they did have the same as the US, then they would definitely need guns and not just batons.


Why accidental shooting is normal routine in USA including that thread that just got deleted attest to that?

Already shown accidental shooting is 1.7% of all gun related deaths. You still persist with calling this "routine". Strange definition of "routine".

You resort to the statistics. Bear in mind, you have to take certain factors into the accounts like the background such as lack of proper resources and funding in other countries comparison to USA who enjoys greater budgets.

You saying the UK, EU and other developed countries dont have such studies and proper resources? I even posted what the violent crime rate is in the UK compared to the US....its almost twice as high!
 
.
No massive drug and gang warfare. If they did have the same as the US, then they would definitely need guns and not just batons.

Already shown accidental shooting is 1.7% of all gun related deaths. You still persist with calling this "routine". Strange definition of "routine".

You saying the UK, EU and other developed countries dont have such studies and proper resources? I even posted what the violent crime rate is in the UK compared to the US....its almost twice as high!

Other countries don't need resource to calm angry crowds because baton is enough to dispel the crowds. Why? Because those nations employ stricter control on gun. It is different with the criminal organizations that relies on black market. That shows those governments have tightened controls to make harder for criminals hence black market.

For USA, never mind the accidental shooting, from the angry crowds to criminals, it is all same for police enforcement. It is hard to tell apart from the civilians with guns to criminals with guns. Police will have respond the same way. In result, some misunderstanding occurs which comes at the expense of the defenseless civilians sometimes.

Don't take my words. Ask American polices directly. Many occasions they have admitted that ever since the gun rights, polices have never been cautious and to the extent, it makes their jobs harder than before. Ask police directly.
 
.
Other countries don't need resource to calm angry crowds because baton is enough to dispel the crowds. Why? Because those nations employ stricter control on gun. It is different with the criminal organizations that relies on black market. That shows those governments have tightened controls to make harder for criminals hence black market.

For USA, never mind the accidental shooting, from the angry crowds to criminals, it is all same for police enforcement. It is hard to tell apart from the civilians with guns to criminals with guns. Police will have respond the same way. In result, some misunderstanding occurs which comes at the expense of the defenseless civilians sometimes.

Don't take my words. Ask American polices directly. Many occasions they have admitted that ever since the gun rights, polices have never been cautious and to the extent, it makes their jobs harder than before. Ask police directly.

Ok if you are talking specifically about crowd control, you have a point to some extent (because the US does use batons,tear gas and the rest in crowd control). At least now you have given up the accidental shooting part of it (as far as the basis of your argument)....so we are making progress (I agree with some of what you are saying and vice versa).

But this is just one part of the whole equation of police, civilian gun ownership and drug/gang criminal prevalence in the US is all I am saying. Its not so simple that you can ban civilian guns and hope police will suddenly be able to use only batons in crowd control when there are significant drug gang elements in many places in the US. The US is not the same as other developed countries, it is a particular situation that will need their people to come up with the solutions particular to their situation and not blindly compare the US with other countries thinking such things as gun control is a one solution fits all for a completely different environment.
 
.
Watched INDEPENDENCE DAY yesterday with my son----do you guiy want me to tell you about the plot---?
 
. .
Yes sir please


Dammit---oh what the heck---. If 3 people agree---then I will spill the beans---but if three people say no before that---then I will hold back---ok.

The first one was an original plot---this one was pathetic----. Wasted $22 on tickets and 20 dollars on soda and pop corn---but my boy was happy---.
 
Last edited:
. .
So today as I was shopping in a supermarket when I went to the elevator to go down to the parking two girls were also waiting. When the door opened they went inside first as I followed in I caught the girl pressing the button for closing the door. She hadn't even pressed her floor button. Was only aiming to close the door before I could enter. This moment marks an epoch in my life. Now I am old enough that some young girl will try to keep me away from her. Up till now all girls would become the undignified sluts, that they all are deep inside, around me. As a philosophical guy this new situation suits me better.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom