What made IAF Stand down in Kargil

[surya kiran]

As I said before, if your so desperate for an answer read my previous posts, or do something called research.

Your inability to answer facts with facts is on show. The fact is you cannot answer. Because you have realised

1. You are not on Siachen. Hell, you are not a km from anywhere near the glacier. You kept saying, I was not clear. I pointed out every statement I made and then asked you to point out where I was not clear. You ran away, like all newbie Pakistani posters do when educated about facts of PA on Siachen.

2. You made claims on Kargil. You failed to go through plethora of information on this very forum, which has been contributed by much more well read members.

Dude, relax. Better to read when you do not know, than to repeat the nonsense of I will not answer and running away.

 

[Hamza913]

Your inability to answer facts with facts is on show. The fact is you cannot answer. Because you have realised

1. You are not on Siachen. Hell, you are not a km from anywhere near the glacier. You kept saying, I was not clear. I pointed out every statement I made and then asked you to point out where I was not clear. You ran away, like all newbie Pakistani posters do when educated about facts of PA on Siachen.

2. You made claims on Kargil. You failed to go through plethora of information on this very forum, which has been contributed by much more well read members.

Dude, relax. Better to read when you do not know, than to repeat the nonsense of I will not answer and running away.

I will say this for the final time, I can easily give you a f*cking answer, but since you acted like a stuck up and rude little b*tch, you did not and will not get one.

 

[surya kiran]

I will say this for the final time, I can easily give you a f*cking answer, but since you acted like a stuck up and rude little b*tch, you did not and will not get one.

No point swearing. Swearing gets you banned. Suggest you delete the post. Debate if possible. Since you are unable to answer, let it rest.

 

[Hamza913]

No point swearing. Swearing gets you banned. Suggest you delete the post. Debate if possible. Since you are unable to answer, let it rest.

I won't delete it, if there is a problem the mods can do that. And it's ironic you bring up banning as you were the one who was rude first. I can very easily answer, but I don't tolerate people who are rude. So you might as well keep quiet and move on, or do some research and discover I am correct.

 

[surya kiran]

I won't delete it, if there is a problem the mods can do that. And it's ironic you bring up banning as you were the one who was rude first. I can very easily answer, but I don't tolerate people who are rude. So you might as well keep quiet and move on, or do some research and discover I am correct.

So still no answer? Facts facts facts. Not your forte. I do not have a problem with you swearing. And its a nice excuse to say I was rude when I asked you what you were asking. Gives you the chance to slither out of a discussion where you had facts all wrong! So still no answer for Siachen and Kargil. Still not shown me where I was not clear with the Siachen comments.

 

[Hamza913]

So still no answer? Facts facts facts. Not your forte. I do not have a problem with you swearing. And its a nice excuse to say I was rude when I asked you what you were asking. Gives you the chance to slither out of a discussion where you had facts all wrong! So still no answer for Siachen and Kargil. Still not shown me where I was not clear with the Siachen comments.

I have proved my points clearly and accurately, and would have continued to do so if you had not decided to be rude. Since you were rude, you will have to take it upon yourself to do research and discover I was correct.

 

[surya kiran]

I have proved my points clearly and accurately, and would have continued to do so if you had not decided to be rude. Since you were rude, you will have to take it upon yourself to do research and discover I was correct.

So still no facts. And slithering away and hiding. Typical when caught with no knowledge of subject matter.

 

[GenerallyKhan]

Yea...typical Pak strategy. Jump into something and then run back. We jumped into East Pakistan. Results were quite different. You again jumped into Afghanistan and then ran out with the American warning!

Yea, like that time when India trained LTTE a.k.a India's Taliban to wage war on Sri Lanka. Everyone knows how that experiment ended.

 

[Hamza913]

So still no facts. And slithering away and hiding. Typical when caught with no knowledge of subject matter.

I have plenty of facts, go read my previous posts. I have told you numerous times yet you don't do it, don't blame me for your incapability to actually be self sufficient.

You also don't seem able to get it through your thick head that I won't give you an argument due to your rude response a while back.

 

[surya kiran]

I have plenty of facts, go read my previous posts. I have told you numerous times yet you don't do it, don't blame me for your incapability to actually be self sufficient.

You also don't seem able to get it through your thick head that I won't give you an argument due to your rude response a while back.

Your facts were all disproved of figments of your imagination. On Siachen and Kargil. Both.

You said, I was not clear on Siachen. Show me where. You have not till date. I have read all you posts. Propaganda and fiction. Is what you have been peddling. Typical of people who have zero information on topic.

You said, Kargil was initiated to score political points. This is called knowing alphabet A and saying you are a masters in literature. Your line of reasoning in this is same as yours on Kargil. Fiction.

Your inability to point out post after post proves beyond doubt you have zero knowledge of either Sicahen or Kargil. And it is real fun to see that you seem to be unable to accept both points.

Yea, like that time when India trained LTTE a.k.a India's Taliban to wage war on Sri Lanka. Everyone knows how that experiment ended.

A foreign policy disaster, but warranted at the time. I agree.

 

[Hamza913]

Your facts were all disproved of figments of your imagination. On Siachen and Kargil. Both.

You said, I was not clear on Siachen. Show me where. You have not till date. I have read all you posts. Propaganda and fiction. Is what you have been peddling. Typical of people who have zero information on topic.

You said, Kargil was initiated to score political points. This is called knowing alphabet A and saying you are a masters in literature. Your line of reasoning in this is same as yours on Kargil. Fiction.

Your inability to point out post after post proves beyond doubt you have zero knowledge of either Sicahen or Kargil. And it is real fun to see that you seem to be unable to accept both points.
.

More nonsense, but what else should I expect from you?

 

[surya kiran]

More nonsense, but what else should I expect from you?

No reply. No facts. What else can be expected from you, except fiction?

 

[Hamza913]

No reply. No facts. What else can be expected from you, except fiction?

Facts, but I don't give them to rude people.

 

[surya kiran]

Facts, but I don't give them to rude people.

Fiction on both Siachen and Kargil. And unable to say those facts, because they are fiction. Hiding behind walls when your lies are caught. Typical of people who are fiction peddlers.

 

[Hamza913]

Fiction on both Siachen and Kargil. And unable to say those facts, because they are fiction. Hiding behind walls when your lies are caught. Typical of people who are fiction peddlers.

Not hiding behind walls, it's this thing called not giving a55holes what they want.