what India gave to the world!!!!!!

[jamahir]

Haha you are funny man.. keep the crap yourself, no body going to buy

well, keep living in religio-nationalist delusions.

 

[SR-91]

india did not give my anything not even a single bottle . so for me india give nothing

Leave hostility, give and spread love,along with your countrymen. I can bet my life, India can give you a lot more you can handle ( of course in a positive manner).


Choice is yours....................

 

[CorporateAffairs]

CULTURE, CIVILIZATION.

 

[Manidabest]

and so you wont accept the fact that Osama was sheltered by Pakistan and keep hiding behind worlds aids data....typical

Again you just dont want to accept the facts that india is home to 2.1million aid patients due to that it ranked 3rd in the world

 

[Indian Jatt]

Most of them ... If I am not wrong almost all of above mention are the inventions of Sindh Civilization.. Todays Pakistan ...

India was a "Adi Vasi" until british invade.

Tum kaunse humse alag ho???until 1947 Pakistan was part of bharat, not Hindustan but bharat or sindhustan, after partion also we share same history, same rulers, same languages, same food, and yes our future too.....its together always

Again you just dont want to accept the facts that india is home to 2.1million aid patients due to that it ranked 3rd in the world

Thats abrogation not achievement.....

where was india before british? even the word india was given by british ,after 1947 they just removed british from british india

Bharat was there.....and also Hindustan was there too.....you know india is our stage name....waise i call myself a bhartiya

 

[Sipahi]

Tum kaunse humse alag ho???until 1947 Pakistan was part of bharat, not Hindustan but bharat or sindhustan, after partion also we share same history, same rulers, same languages, same food, and yes our future too.....its together always

But we were not the adi vasi of south India

 

[Indian Jatt]

But we were not the adi vasi of south India

they were not adivasi but were the most developed kingdoms of their times....
The history of the southern part of India covers a span of over four thousand years during which the region saw the rise and fall of a number of dynasties and empires. The period of known history of the region begins with the Iron age (1200 BCE to 24 BCE) period until the 14th century CE. Dynasties of Satavahana, Chola, Chalukya, Pallava, Rashtrakuta, Kakatiya and Hoysala were at their peak during various periods of history. These Dynasties constantly fought amongst each other and against external forces when Muslim armies invaded south India. Vijayanagara empire rose in response to the Muslim intervention and covered the most of south India and acted as a bulwark against Mughal expansion into the south. When the European powers arrived during the 16th century CE, the southern kingdoms resisted the new threats, and many parts eventually succumbed to British occupation. The British created the Madras Presidency which covered most of south India directly administered by the British Raj, and divided the rest into a number of dependent princely states. After Indian independence South India was linguistically divided into the states of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu.
read this....
History of South India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[dray]

come on, so many posts in this thread are hardly in the scientific direction... they are really pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo and fantasies brought by religio-nationalism.



the below is my post from months ago...

my concept about god is closest to the islami thought of the formless presence who begets not, nor was he born ( from a creature )... this presence is not affected by worship or human hope.

the nepal earthquake demolished the prayer houses of buddhists,hindus, muslims, christians... and some of these had stood for centuries and been visited by countless daily worshipers and pilgrims... all those idols and accepted shapes of the prayer houses and their special establishment rituals were of no help.

what was this earthquake that destroyed in seconds the human imaginings of "the divine"... the earthquake was nature... perhaps nature is god and god is nature... immovable, undefeatable, existent.

in early 2013, russia saw a passage in its skies of a meteor from space... it arrived without much warning and didn't even have to touch the ground to injure 7000+ people and damage 1000+ buildings... this world hangs delicate in the vastness of space and in space no understanding of human religion can make effect... i see space as the outer nature, the real nature.

what if a mad-man with the capabilities of elon musk were to go out into the "asteroid belt" ( between mars and jupiter ) and put rocket engines onto three 1-km wide asteroids, push them towards earth and smash them into riyadh, varanasi and vatican... would these three centers of extreme belief in religiosity survive the impacts??

the mad-man can claim that he is doing the work of nature, of god... and his belief will stand supreme to the belief of every religious believer on this world.

idolatry is a attribute of most religions and it is false system... when prayer houses have idols and those idols cannot resist the strikes of man ( raider from another culture ) or nature ( earthquake, rain, flood, meteor ), where stands the belief system in such?? also, what is the point in bathing idols in milk and feeding them other foods when the idols neither live nor cannot they protect themselves... if so, those foods are being wasted on rock, metal and plaster when they could have sated the undeniable material needs of hungry people.

i will stop here.

And what is your take on Mecca, Medina, Hajj, Kabah, huge number of animal slaughter in Id, and several accidents in Mecca during Hajj?

 

[HariPrasad]

The Arabs did that.

Humm You are showing too much honesty to your master/ Fore fathers. The Arab who are not capable of understanding elementary maths in 21st century discovered Zero thousand of years ago. This is what and how abrhmic religion change the mind of people.

 

[dray]

incorrect, 600 ad ideology uncountably sophisticated than 900 bc ideology.

read my just created thread - prenups in indian weddings and islam

And we are seeing the 'sophistication' everywhere!

 

[Mirza Jatt]

Again you just dont want to accept the facts that india is home to 2.1million aid patients due to that it ranked 3rd in the world

You shouldnt have sheltered a terrorist like Osama.

 

[Mabs]

You haven't read the book...shut your mouth

'the' book or a book? Again, quit telling everyone you're a fool.

Sir, nobody in India is taking credit forecefully, we never said Pakistan not to take part in the shared history. The very fact that your political masters deny your own history goes to prove about your sheer arrogance and ignorance. Ask yourself, if Pakistan ever gave credit to Maratha Kingdom, or Guru Govind Singh or the Chola Dynasty or the Maurian Empire or Ashoka or the advent of Hinduism or Buddhism or Sikhism or Jainism, instead your whole history is focused on Mughals from Uzbekistan or Persian empire or Ottoman. Do not blame us when you yourself selectively chose to see history on the basis of your religion. Leaving the past, have your nation ever gave credit to Gandhi, Shahid Bhagat Singh, Khudiram Bose, Subhash Bose, Asaf Ali, Ashfaq Ullah Khan, Mangal Pandey, Rani Lakshmi Bai? the one`s that made our country free from british. The answer is No. why mostly because it never suited your ideologies and the basis of forming your nation. Just because you never claimed history because of religion and ideologies doesn`t mean we won`t.

No, there're countless other people who contributed to the long war which you don't know of because they don't fit in India's idea of nationalism. Ever heard of Dulla Bhatti? And even if I agree with you and accept that we didn't own our history; that doesn't give you the right to hijack it. It doesn't work that way.

 

[Manidabest]

You shouldnt have sheltered a terrorist like Osama.

no prove of sheltering but u did voted a criminal to the highest of your country .. modi

 

[jamahir]

And what is your take on Mecca, Medina, Hajj, Kabah

there is one post on hajj[1].

and these[2][3] on hajj subsidy in india.

i did write about kaaba on the previous page[4].

huge number of animal slaughter in Id

if you are talking about bakrid, the sacrifice of the animals is a tribute to abrahamic prophethood but also a moral lesson in guise of a festival ritual to guard against human sacrifice and does not comprise the core innovations and credo of islam... it is a festival tradition and can be reduced or discarded altogether without stopping islam from being islam... over the centuries, people didn't adopt islam for its festivals or prayers but because of the liberation and rights it gave them.

and several accidents in Mecca during Hajj?

[5][6].

And we are seeing the 'sophistication' everywhere!

so just because many followers adopted corrupted ways you will not respect the original ways??

you will find this in the link[7] in the post you quoted...

When we examine marriage laws in their historic context, it is interesting to note that the universally accepted notion that marriages are contractual rather than sacramental originates in Muslim law, which was accepted by the French law only in the 1800s and incorporated into the English law in the 1850s and became part of codified Hindu law as late as 1955. Today it appears to be the most practical way of dealing with the institution of marriage. Treating marriage as a sacrament which binds the parties for life has resulted in some of the most discriminatory practices against women such as sati and denial of right to divorce and remarriage, even in the most adverse conditions.

The cornerstone of a Muslim marriage is consent, ejab-o-qubul (proposal and acceptance) and requires the bride to accept the marriage proposal on her own free will. This freedom to consent (or refuse), which was given to Muslim women 1,400 years ago, is still not available under Hindu law since sacramental rituals such as saptapadi and kanya dan (seven steps round the nuptial fire and gifting of the bride to the groom) still form essential ceremonies of a Hindu marriage. Even after the codification of Hindu law, the notion of consent is not built into the marriage ceremonies.

you should read that thread op entirely, though the sophistication is not limited to just weddings/marriage.

-----

[1] #BloodlessEid trends on Twitter in India | Page 3

[2] Hajj pilgrim numbers as economic indicator for Indian Muslims

[3] Hajj pilgrim numbers as economic indicator for Indian Muslims

[4] what India gave to the world!!!!!! | Page 19

[5] US to oppose plea to declare RSS a terror group | Page 3

[6] Bangladeshi Fashion | Page 68

[7] prenups in indian weddings and islam

 

[Mirza Jatt]

no prove of sheltering but u did voted a criminal to the highest of your country .. modi

Osama was a terrorist it is proven.

But Pakistan PM nawaz sharf meets Modi secretly who is a criminal.
Imran Khan the leader of opposition meets Modi in India who is a criminal

see your Govt and your leaders in your country are a criminal....why did you vote criminals to highest rank of your country ? then you will automatically get your answer why we elected Modi ..but why did you shelter Osama ?