What's new

What ethnic group are Afghan Hindus?

His historical birth place is somewhere in Pakistan. Some believe in Mianwali distrcit or near Taxila.

He was from Magadha, he went to Takshashila to study.
 
Sure, Pakistanis don't spend money on fairness cream. :smart::smart:

creame1.jpg

Not half our income for sure. Also majority here worry more about facial feutures and weight instead of skin tone. Because fair skin tone does not make you beutifull.
 
Not half our income for sure. Also majority here worry more about facial feutures and weight instead of skin tone. Because fair skin tone does not make you beutifull.

That's a cheap cream which can make you fair in 3 days. :omghaha::omghaha: Sure that cheap cream won't cost you much. :yes4:
 
His historical birth place is somewhere in Pakistan. Some believe in Mianwali distrcit or near Taxila.
his birth place is a matter of controversy ...so, no one know ...exactly...
so saying he was born in taxila is so wrong of you...
 
He was from Magadha, he went to Takshashila to study.

Thats what revionists hindus historians believe.

'"According to the Buddhist text Mahavamsa Tika, his birthplace was Taxila."

But hindus has tried to put most of ancient figures birth places in India. History and religion should never be mixed.

That's a cheap cream which can make you fair in 3 days. :omghaha::omghaha: Sure that cheap cream won't cost you much. :yes4:

It will cost us our dignity, we ars not beghairat to use fairness cream to whiten our self like wannabe aryana.

So what was the comment about "hindus enjoying the show"?

He meant hindus east of punjab enjoying the show when Alexander come.
 
@shan Punjabis are in no place to talk about history when they where raped and converted by force. You will never be on the same level as brave Rajputs.
 
Thats what revionists hindus historians believe.
'"According to the Buddhist text Mahavamsa Tika, his birthplace was Taxila."
But hindus has tried to put most of ancient figures birth places in India. History and religion should never be mixed.
The Jain scriptures, such asAdbidhana Chintamani, mention him as a Dramila, implying that he was a native of South India.[9][10] According to the Jain writer Hemachandra's Parishishtaparva, Chanakya was born in the Canaka village of the Golla region, to a Jain Brahmin named Canin and his wife Canesvari.[11] Other sources mention his father's name as Chanak and state that Chanakya's name derives from his father's name
 
@shan Punjabis are in no place to talk about history when they where raped and converted by force. You will never be on the same level as brave Rajputs.

No offence but i have no respect for Rajasthanis rajputs because of their way of dealing with enemy. After they saw Akbar army they gave away their princess instead of war. While Punjabi rajputs were fighting akbar armies and he had to move his capital to,Lahore for 20 years.
 
Thats what revionists hindus historians believe.

'"According to the Buddhist text Mahavamsa Tika, his birthplace was Taxila."

But hindus has tried to put most of ancient figures birth places in India. History and religion should never be mixed.



It will cost us our dignity, we ars not beghairat to use fairness cream to whiten our self like wannabe aryana.



He meant hindus east of punjab enjoying the show when Alexander come.

Source dikhao snowwhite. :laugh:
 
No offence but i have no respect for Rajasthanis rajputs because of their way of dealing with enemy. After they saw Akbar army they gave away their princess instead of war. While Punjabi rajputs were fighting akbar armies and he had to move his capital to,Lahore for 20 years.
Punjabis never fought back, you submissively accepted your fate as rape victims. BTW my clan(Tomaras) never gave up are women. There are even records that Rajput women killed themselves then accept Muslims. Seriously you people have never had any kingdoms LMAO.
 
The Jain scriptures, such asAdbidhana Chintamani, mention him as a Dramila, implying that he was a native of South India.[9][10] According to the Jain writer Hemachandra's Parishishtaparva, Chanakya was born in the Canaka village of the Golla region, to a Jain Brahmin named Canin and his wife Canesvari.[11] Other sources mention his father's name as Chanak and state that Chanakya's name derives from his father's name

I would rather believe Budist text written by our ancestors then current day bhayaa of bihar, no offence.
 
Thats what revionists hindus historians believe.

'"According to the Buddhist text Mahavamsa Tika, his birthplace was Taxila."

But hindus has tried to put most of ancient figures birth places in India. History and religion should never be mixed.
It is not a revisionist view..In accordance to ancient hindu and jain scriptures he was said to be from modern day india..
The Jain scriptures, such as Adbidhana Chintamani, mention him as aDramila, implying that he was a native of South India.[9][10] According to the Jain writerHemachandra's Parishishtaparva, Chanakya was born in the Canaka village of the Golla region, to aJain Brahmin named Canin and his wife Canesvari.[11] Other sources mention his father's name as Chanak and state that Chanakya's name derives from his father's name.[12] According to some sources, Chanakya was Brahmin from northIndia, scholar in Vedas,[13] and a devotee of LordVishnu.[14] According to Jain accounts he became Jain in old age like Chandragupta Maurya
And btw there is nothing like hindus putting ancient figures origin in india-almost all of the ancient scientists and scholars like aryabhata, varahamihira,charaka, susrutha etc except may be panini are from modern day india. .
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom