jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
@jhungary ....Sir,a very well written piece and should be a lesson to warmongers and keyboard warriors here on this Forum and elsewhere...
Thanks, actually i wrote this piece out of anger, most of the stuff i wrote is directly coming from my brain, glad you like it tho
There is another thing that the Top Brass has to worry about- Battle of Accounts; the concerned scenarios emerge due to the limited budget sanctioned to armed forces.
Then there are authorities to whom Top Brass is answerable- Pentagon/ South Block.
Well, Napoleon once said, an Army march on stomach, obiviously Napoleon have never been on modern battlefield....
Today, everythying is money, I remember a discussion with my wife once, about anti-war protestor. War started mostly because of money. No matter what the clause is, you can bet your *** that i can be traced to money or financial gain. Problem is, everyone who support a clause supporting money, anti-war or pro-war alike, and that would make literally everyone supporting a clause, supporting war. Ironically, even the anti-war protestor actually themselves supporting war. Ever see an anti-war protestor does not wear any clothes and shoes?? How are you going to protest if you do not have money??
Sad truth is, this world, everything is about money, from the T-shirt you're wearing to the house you are living. When you projected it to our society, you can immediately see the same stuff going on again. Government were supported by Capitalist and the Capitalist were in turn supported by Corporation.
Budget wise, it does affect anyone who involved in direct warfare. Take the example i raise in my OP, they can approve a schema of 140 men charging a hill with 40% KIA and WIA, this cost a lot less than risking an AC-130 being shot down with maybe 15-20% casualty. Another sad truth behind war is, human live worth less than machinary.
10 days? I bet you everything I own most of these posters will have changed their minds half way through. If not then there would be a more deep psychological problem if you find it better to live scavenging the streets and making sense of the vague religious prophecies to be coming true.
lol actually, i don't quite know actually, i had never been on 10 days straight MRE, i had it for 3 days for an Ops. I can only tell you hot chow never felt so good before
![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.gif)
Yeah, those keyboard warrior have their comfort at home sitting inside an airconditioned room, of course they can have any kind of verbal diarrea they can have. it is a different world overthere and sitting in my lounge
@jhungary Great piece.Thank you.As you said you go to war for the next guy or the guy beside you.Why do people join the armed forces in the first place.Compared to any other job Military is unique.What drives people to join a risky and potentially fatal job?I know there are other jobs from truckers to test pilots which are risky but what drives people to join a profession which requires you to kill or be killed?
People sign up for all sort of reason, From people who trying to get a steady 3 square a day to people who want to protect their country.
Why people joined up maybe different, but when that person become a soldier, he/she will have the same bond than anyman running down the line. People don't get to be a soldier until they understand and share the same bond with one another.
Let me tell you a story, there were once a Sergeant in my platoon, we were one of the earliest who went over in Iraq. He did a tour with me back in 2003, and one day out of a suddent he requested a transfer to another regiment in 2004, i talked to him, he wanted to go back to Iraq, well, i let that happened.
An year later, that same sergeant ask to go back to Iraq again, and this time i ask him why. and do you know what he said??
"If not me, who will?? If i don't go overthere and there will be a place for somebody else, if that guy's killed, it will be on me. And i can never live with that."
That, i guess, sums up it all....
The politicians' stirring phrases are meant to keep our eyes averted from the reality of war -- to make us imagine heroic young men marching in parades, winning glorious battles, and bringing peace and democracy to the world.
But war is something quite different from that.
It is your children or your grandchildren dying before they're even fully adults, or being maimed or mentally scarred for life. It is your brothers and sisters being taught to kill other people -- and to hate people who are just like themselves and who don't want to kill anyone either. It is your children seeing their buddies' limbs blown off their bodies.
It is hundreds of thousands of human beings dying years before their time. It is millions of people separated forever from the ones they loved.
It is the destruction of homes for which people worked for decades. It is the end of careers that meant as much to others as your career means to you.
It is the imposition of heavy taxes on you and on other Americans and on people in other countries -- taxes that remain long after the war is over. It is the suppression of free speech and the jailing of people who criticize the government.
It is the imposition of slavery by forcing young men to serve in the military.
It is goading the public to hate foreign people and races -- whether Arabs or Japanese or Cubans. It is numbing our sensibilities to cruelties inflicted on foreigners.
It is cheering at the news of foreign pilots killed in their planes, of young men blown to bits while trapped inside tanks, of sailors drowned at sea.
Other tragedies inevitably trail in the wake of war. Politicians lie even more than usual. Secrecy and cover-ups become the rule rather than the exception. The press becomes even less reliable.
War is genocide, torture, cruelty, propaganda, dishonesty, and slavery.![]()
Yeah, the problem is, people sitting at home have no way to know what it takes for the young to fight, and people who know absolutely nothing wanting to have a human carnage for any ridicious reason, that enrage me
![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.gif)
Thanks for your comment tho
![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.gif)
@jhungary On the topic of obeying the officer with a higher rank, from character development classes (Civil Air Patrol the USAF's auxiliary), I believe that coincides with the first core value, integrity. Integrity states when the officer with a higher rank gives you commands that is immoral, the person shouldn't follow that command, but it also breaks the chain-of-command (kind of). Is that true? Thanks for the reply.
The theme is what kind of situation you are in.
In peace time, Men disobey order all the time, when i order someone to clean barrack, latrine, and it's still dirty when i come back and inspect it. The fact behind is not what will happen when you disobeying an order, but rather when??
In war. Things is a bit..., i don't know the word for it, foggy??
Say for an example, you are ordered to advance 100 meters in an open field, and your objective is to set up a defence line overwatch, but there are nothing for cover beyond the 75 meter mark, if you, as a Squad leader or platoon leader, only advanced up to 75 meter and set up DP on it, will it say you disobey an order up top??
I would say, commander follow orders, regardless on how immoral or ridicious it was, but the skill of interpreting an order is what seperate a good commander and the rest of us. Sometime you need to think how to make that order make sense to you, and you do allow to change (or using my word, interpreting) the order inorder to make sense.
However, when you are saying an outright refusal of order, that would be a different matter.
In short, i can only say this, you have your right to refuse to follow any order that you think it does not make sense. but the top brass also have right to all sort of thing from relieve you from your command, to have you shot.
There are actually cases that a ruling on order is found to be illogicial after a court martial, but that person who refused the order in the end were strip of the command anyway. Kind of like when you wistleblow, you can never work in the same field ever again. Even in the end turns out you are right.
Did i asnwer your question or you want further explanation