Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
when you sign a deal sell your soul for cheap land grabbing opportunities you do stupid things! you support protect zardari you breed nawaz you sign deal with india sell the land nation struggled and sacrificed for and now you selling their narative and making their annexation legit!I seriously want to ask the establishment of Pakistan this simple question.
Since when Kashmiri struggle against the Indian ILLEGAL occupation and oppression , be it peaceful or though the barrel of gun, becomes terrorism?
Are we fking selling Indian narrative in our own backyard?
This happens when you rattafy CSS books and become a bureaucrat. No understanding of statecraft.
What we have now are likes of Bajwa and Kayani. They are way too pacifist. Absence of Hamid Gul and Asad Durrani is immensely felt. I hope Zaid Hamid is taken as NSA otherwise these pacifist will sink Pakistan.
You mean oppressing them is labelled fighting in india?We fought for Kashmir and are continuing to do so.
Let's keep it real you ain't gonna reunite shit and as far as Kashmir is concerned one day you will give it up and that's a factNo I don’t see.
To call Indian troop placement in Kashmir as illegal occupation is plain dumb because ONLY India has a LEGAL document that speaks to the accession of J&K.
You bringing up Junagadh is nothing short of deflection and I answered that it should have gone to you according to the rules of partition.
But if your country didn’t care to enforce its claim, it’s not our fault.
Remember, India didn’t want partition, Pakistan did. So obviously we will try to unite as much of pre partition India that we can/could given the scope.
India never respected the Instrument of Accession either as they forcefully annexed Junagarh and Hyderabad. So why should Pakistan have respected Hari Singh's decision to concede to India?The only LEGAL document for accession of Kashmir has India written on it.
So if we go by rules of partition, any illegality that exists, is on the Pakistani side of Kashmir.
when a crook illegally occupies a piece of land...it doesnt become his land...Mental gymnastics isn’t going to help you.
India is fighting for what it considers its land aka Kashmir (and after article 370, now Pak occupied Kashmir) . Now you can skin that cat 10 different ways to soothe your hurt ego. Makes zero difference to me.
Fact remains, to call Indian presence there as illegal is plain stupid as we are the only ones with a LEGAL claim to the land according to the rules of partition.
(Which is the statement I commented on)
Let's keep it real you ain't gonna reunite shit and as far as Kashmir is concerned one day you will give it up and that's a fact
when a crook illegally occupies a piece of land...it doesnt become his land...
Article 370 was about india nothing to do with international issues...SO having 370 or not doesnt effect international laws...Not sure which lawyer fed you BS!
"Sohni rohndi yaaran nu le kay na parava tha" mate the future is clear I can visit azad Kashmir without the fear off getting lynched and free off police protection whilst you cannot do the same in Indian occupied Kashmir.Now reverse that same sentence and thought to speak about Pak occupies Kashmir.
Are you going to eventually give it up keeping the same logic?
If not, don’t expect your bigger, more resourceful neighbor to!
You aren’t a fortune teller, nor am I. So don’t speak in future tense please.
Do Kashmiris want u there? When the people hate ur rapist army what claim do u have there? Unless ur a fascist government (hint: You are).Mental gymnastics isn’t going to help you.
India is fighting for what it considers its land aka Kashmir (and after article 370, now Pak occupied Kashmir) . Now you can skin that cat 10 different ways to soothe your hurt ego. Makes zero difference to me.
Fact remains, to call Indian presence there as illegal is plain stupid as we are the only ones with a LEGAL claim to the land according to the rules of partition.
(Which is the statement I commented on)
A document that for 70 years has never been entertained by UN?Indian troop presence in J&K is not occupation because we have a legal document to prove claim.
A war erupted and India approached the United Nations asking it to intervene. The United Nations recommended holding a plebiscite to settle the question of whether the state would join India or Pakistan. However the two countries could not agree to a deal to demilitarise the region before the referendum could be held.
In July 1949, India and Pakistan signed an agreement to establish a ceasefire line as recommended by the UN and the region became divided.
Basically back to being disputed...Those two are two mutually exclusive events/ cases. Legality of the instrument of accession gives us the right to be in Kashmir. However removal of Article 370 and converting Kashmir into a UT, the way it was done was illegal, based on Indian law.
Yes it is occupation hence why your Prime Minister promised plebiscite in UNITED NATIONS. Do you even understand the meaning of disputed territory? You might have coaxed Google to change maps for ever ignoramus Indians but the world still considers it as a dispute between China Pakistan and indiaIndian troop presence in J&K is not occupation because we have a legal document to prove claim.
Apparently they dont even know what the accession claims...what the DEAL REALLY was? indians really kept in the dark, yea?
"Sohni rohndi yaaran nu le kay na parava tha" mate the future is clear I can visit azad Kashmir without the fear off getting lynched and free off police protection whilst you cannot do the same in Indian occupied Kashmir.
They are trying to impose their slum politics on civilized worldBtw, your representative at UNSC said to the world that india abides by simla agreement...by said agreement, Kashmir is a disputed territory and requires bilateral agreement to change anything so for starters 370 was not bilateral so as per international laws, having 370 or not doesnt affect the disputed territory!
Apparently they dont even know what the accession claims...what the DEAL REALLY was? indians really kept in the dark, yea?