"We had killed so many Chinese"

[faithfulguy]

India lost the war not because China was superior, but because Indians were out numbered by 10,000 to 80,000 Chinese forces and because India didn't anticipated the war coming.

I think India lost the war because it was giving too many excuses for losing. So it lost.

 

[walle]

the time for saving face was 60 years ago, not 2013.

just be grateful to the chinese captors that didn't execute all those POWs.

 

[Jade]

You lost the war because the stupidity of your leadership as reflected in the following points:

1) Your leadership foolishly believed by forwarding into Chinese territory (as perceived by the Chinese because they don't give a sh!t of colonial McMahon line), by helping Tibetan riots, the Chinese would keep signing Hindi-chini bhai bhai instead of hitting back. Be rational: once getting invaded, nobody would behave as such.

2) When the Chinese did give you a shock by hitting back on you, your foolish leadership, instead of relying on experienced military leaders, they still relied on nepotism. Nehru made Kaul, his relative, the army chief who never saw a Chinese soldier before.

In retrospect, just asking yourselves: do you know the Chinese well today? Is nepotism/family dynasty an essential part of your culture today? Is you main job flattering your managers today?


If you answer is yes to 1 or 2 of the above 3 questions, forget about retaliating on China. If your answer is yes 3 out of 3, which most probably would be as of today, you better wait for 5-10 generations while you are improving.

Interpretations are dime a dozen. List the facts.

The facts are

1. 80000 Chinese fought 10000 Indian soldiers. Where as the casualties were 1300 Indians to 700 Chinese.
2. In spite of your 'victory', Chinese retreated and handed over Twang back to India.
3. In spite of your 'victory', Dalai Lama continue and flourishes to be in India.

As on the dynasty, nepotism/family, managers, I am not interested in a Chinese opinion. Slaves should not have an opinion.

 

[ice bomb]

Interpretations are dime a dozen. List the facts.

The facts are

1. 80000 Chinese fought 10000 Indian soldiers. Where as the casualties were 1300 Indians to 700 Chinese.
2. In spite of your 'victory', Chinese retreated and handed over Twang back to India.
3. In spite of your 'victory', Dalai Lama continue and flourishes to be in India.

As on the dynasty, nepotism/family, managers, I am not interested in a Chinese opinion. Slaves should not have an opinion.

Well according to wiki:
1,383 Killed[5]
1,047 Wounded [5]
1,696 Missing[5]
3,968 Captured[5]

On the chinese side:
722 Killed.[5]
1,697 Wounded[5][6]

And it was a war. It is not like your typical Bollywood movie that a equal number of people facing each other and the bad guys come at you one at a time.
You lost, get over it.

 

[AADHAAR]

Well according to wiki:
1,383 Killed[5]
1,047 Wounded [5]
1,696 Missing[5]
3,968 Captured[5]

On the chinese side:
722 Killed.[5]
1,697 Wounded[5][6]

And it was a war. It is not like your typical Bollywood movie that a equal number of people facing each other and the bad guys come at you one at a time.
You lost, get over it.

So, 1383 Indians killed and 722 Chinese killed .. means India lost??

Are you stupid.. or that you mean that we need to kill an additional 661 chinese to get even with china !!!!

If that were so, Soviet Union badly lost to Nazis in WW2 (much more russians died, as compared to germans).

And don't start counting how many chinese got killed in korean war.. which they claim they "won".

The fact is chinese returned without a treaty because India refused the same.

If they had "won", its they who would have been "occupying" their south tibet, not us having arunachal pradesh (NEFA) as a state as before the conflict.

Even on the western front, nothing changed in 1962... Aksai chin was occupied illegally (and secretly) in 1959, not in 1962.

 

[chinapakistan]

After finishing reading all the posts of this thread, The only conclusion I got is the thread starter needs to see shrinker.

 

[seekerofstars]

kill so many, but could not kill more. all is the pity.

kill so many, but could not kill more. all is the pity.

After finishing reading all the posts of this thread, The only conclusion I got is the thread starter needs to see shrinker.

and the chinese person hiding in tokyo should not? ha, ironic how you han purport of friendship with the pakistanis, but more of you go to japan than to north korea/pakistan/iran....

 

[chinapakistan]

kill so many, but could not kill more. all is the pity.

kill so many, but could not kill more. all is the pity.


and the chinese person hiding in tokyo should not? ha, ironic how you han purport of friendship with the pakistanis, but more of you go to japan than to north korea/pakistan/iran....

Kids, using a new ID changes nothing.